切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 33 -37. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2022.01.008

论著

不同亚型子痫前期患者母儿结局分析
杜培丽1, 孙雯1, 苏春宏1, 张春芳1, 余琳1, 贺芳1, 杜丽丽1, 陈兢思1, 陈敦金1,()   
  1. 1. 510105 广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科 广东省产科重大疾病重点实验室 广州重症孕产妇救治中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-12 出版日期:2022-02-18
  • 通信作者: 陈敦金
  • 基金资助:
    国自然科学基金重点项目(81830045)

Analysis of maternal and fetal outcomes in different subtype of preeclampsia

Peili Du1, Wen Sun1, Chunhong Su1, Chunfang Zhang1, Lin Yu1, Fang He1, Lili Du1, Jingsi Chen1, Dunjin Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangzhou Medical Center for Critical Pregnant Women, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2021-10-12 Published:2022-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Dunjin Chen
引用本文:

杜培丽, 孙雯, 苏春宏, 张春芳, 余琳, 贺芳, 杜丽丽, 陈兢思, 陈敦金. 不同亚型子痫前期患者母儿结局分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2022, 11(01): 33-37.

Peili Du, Wen Sun, Chunhong Su, Chunfang Zhang, Lin Yu, Fang He, Lili Du, Jingsi Chen, Dunjin Chen. Analysis of maternal and fetal outcomes in different subtype of preeclampsia[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(01): 33-37.

目的

分析不同亚型子痫前期患者的母儿结局。

方法

回顾性分析2009年1月1日至2019年12月31日在广州医科大学附属第三医院分娩的2960例单胎子痫前期患者早产组与足月产组、早发型组与晚发型组的临床资料及母儿结局。

结果

(1)母亲结局:①早产组与足月产组剖宫产率分别为(80.85% vs 61.67%, χ2=1.327)、入住重症监护病房率(11.84% vs 2.25%, χ2=86.844),P值均<0.05;②早发型与晚发型剖宫产率分别为(77.61% vs 70.30%, χ2=1.327,P<0.05)、入住重症监护病房率(13.00% vs 4.55%, χ2=69.158,P<0.05)。(2)新生儿结局:①早产组与足月产组在新生儿出生平均体重[(1472.19±673.50)g与(3067.49±523.92)g,Z=-42.4],活产比例(81.35% vs 99.31%, χ2=2.204),新生儿窒息率(6.39% vs 0.79%, χ2=53.51)P均<0.05。②早发型组与晚发型组新生儿出生体重[(1169.53±482.39)g vs(2765.37±683.22)g,Z=-43.895],活产比例(74.64% vs 98.31%, χ2=3.926),新生儿窒息率(8.71% vs 1.31%, χ2=86.82),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

子痫前期患者早产组与足月产组相比,早产组母体及新生儿结局均较差。早发型与晚发型子痫前期相比,早发型母儿结局均较差。

Objective

To analyze the maternal and neonatal outcomes of patients with different subtype of preeclampsia.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data and maternal and infant outcomes of 2960 singleton patients with or without early-onset/late onset preeclampsia, who delivered from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2019 in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University.

Results

(1) Maternal outcomes: ① Compared with the preterm preeclampsia group and term preeclalmpsia group, the rates of cesarean section were 80.85% and 61.67%, respectively ( χ2=1.327), the rates of admission to the intensive care unit was respectively 11.84% and 2.25% ( χ2=86.844); ② The rates of early-onset preeclampsia and late-onset preeclampsia cesarean section was 77.61% and 70.30%, respectively ( χ2=1.327, P<0.05). Admission rate of intensive care unit was 13.00% and 4.55%, respiectively in early-onset group and late-onset group ( χ2=69.158, P<0.05). (2) Neonatal outcomes: ① The mean birth weight of newborns was respectively (1472.19±673.50)g and (3067.49±523.92)g (Z=-42.4), the proportion of live births was respectively 81.35% and 99.31% comparing in early-onset group and late-onset group ( χ2=2.204). The rate of neonatal asphyxia was 6.39% and 0.79%, respectively in two groups ( χ2=53.51, all P<0.05). ② Neonatal birth weight in early-onset group and late-onset group was respectively (1169.53±482.39)g and (2765.37±683.22)g (Z=-43.895), live birth ratio was 74.64% and 98.31% ( χ2=3.926), the rate of neonatal asphyxia was 8.71% and 1.31%, comparing in the two groups ( χ2=86.82). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with preterm preeclampsia and term preeclampsia, the maternal and neonatal outcomes were worse in preterm preeclampsia. Compared with the late-onset group, maternal and child outcomes were worse in the early-onset group.

表1 2960例子痫前期孕妇早产组与足月产组、早发型组与晚发型组一般资料比较
表2 早产组与足月产组、早发型与晚发型子痫前期孕妇妊娠结局的比较
表3 早产组与足月产组、早发型与晚发型子痫前期孕妇新生儿结局的比较
[1]
ACOG. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia [J]. Obstet Gynecol2019133(1):e1-e25.
[2]
Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention [J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2019145 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-33.
[3]
谢幸,孔北华,段涛主编.妇产科学[M].9版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:84,204,175.
[4]
Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early- versus late-onset disease [J].Am J Obstet Gynecol2013209(6):544.el-544.el2.
[5]
Ponticelli C, Moroni G. Is preeclampsia a risk for end-stage renal disease? [J].Kidney Int201996(3):547-549.
[6]
Wu P, Haththotuwa R, Kwok CS, et al. Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].Circ Cardiovase Qual Outcomes201710(2):1-9.
[7]
Irgens HU, Reisaeter L, Irgens LM, et al. Long term mortality of mothers and fathers after pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study [J].BMJ2001323(7323):1213-1217.
[8]
史春,张美龄,韩燕媚,等. 早发型子痫前期发病危险因素分析 [J]. 临床军医杂志 202149(6):666-667+670.
[9]
李维,杨孜,王海玲,等. 子痫前期复发影响因素临床研究 [J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志201430(10):780-785.
[10]
杨怡珂,漆洪波.美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)"妊娠期高血压和子痫前期指南2019版"要点解读(第一部分)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志201935(8):895-899.
[11]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组.妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志202055(4):227-238.
[12]
Riise HK, Sulo G, Tell GS, et al. Incident coronary heart disease after preeclampsia: role of reduced fetal growth,preterm delivery, and parity [J].J Am Heart Assoc20176(3):1-12.
[13]
季燕雯,陈先侠,王海霞,等. 早发型子痫前期不良妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J]. 实用医学杂志202036(12):1590-1594.
[14]
Snydal S.Major changes in diagnosis and management of preeclampsia [J].J Midwifery Womens Health, 201459(6):596-605.
[15]
雷少霞,韦备,朱元方,等.早发型重度子痫前期分娩孕周对母儿预后的影响[J].热带医学杂志202020(8):1079-1081+1089
[16]
卢丽敏,赫英东,陈倩,等.早发型重度子痫前期患者分娩孕周对母儿结局的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志201045(11):829-832
[17]
Churchill D, Duley L, Thornton JG, et al. Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre-eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks′ gestation [J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev201810:1-41.
[18]
Haddad B, Sibai BM. Expectant management in pregnancies with severe pre-eclampsia [J]. Semin Perinatol, 200933(3):143-151.
[1] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[7] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[8] 冯丹艳, 曹晓辉, 史玉霞. 血清脂联素与胎盘亮氨酸氨肽酶对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[9] 刘艳艳, 谭曦, 彭雪. 妊娠合并膀胱低度恶性潜能乳头状尿路上皮肿瘤并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 212-218.
[10] 韦先梅, 韩毓, 蒋英彩. 敲减circSERPINE2通过靶向调控miR-34a-5p表达抑制滋养层细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 193-201.
[11] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[12] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[13] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[14] 吴晓翔, 杨波, 李景漩, 张凤玲, 郭桂辉, 郑少培. 脐动脉超声检查联合NLR、sFlt-1/PLGF对妊娠高血压综合征患者不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[15] 张丽姿, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的不良结局及远期影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
阅读次数
全文


摘要