切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
专家论坛

客观评价胎心监护应用的局限性

  • 李航 ,
  • 马润玫
展开
  • 1. 650032 昆明医科大学第一附属医院妇产科
通信作者:马润玫,Email:
李航,马润玫.客观评价胎心监护应用的局限性[J/CD].中华产科急救电子杂志,2020, 9(3): 154-160.

收稿日期: 2020-01-15

  网络出版日期: 2020-08-18

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(81760274); 云南省科技攻关项目项目(2018ZF009)

The objective evaluation of fetal heart monitoring limitation-

  • Hang Li ,
  • Runmei Ma
Expand

Received date: 2020-01-15

  Online published: 2020-08-18

摘要

胎心监护是目前产程中监护胎儿的主要手段,但其广泛应用并未降低脑瘫发生率及新生儿死亡率,反而增加了剖宫产及阴道手术产率。近年来提出的胎心监护三级评价系统对客观评价胎心监护也存在一定的局限性。

本文引用格式

李航 , 马润玫 . 客观评价胎心监护应用的局限性[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2020 , 09(03) : 154 -160 . DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2020.03.007

Abstract

Intrapartum fetal monitoring is an important method to determine the fetal well-being in order to detect signs of intrapartum hypoxia. However, this technology has not improve perinatal mortality and the incidence of cerebral palsy. Instead, the rates of caesarean section and instrumental deliveries have been continuously increased. There are also specific limitations and underlying deficiencies in the Category Ⅰ-Ⅲ system.

参考文献

[1]
Gabbe Steven G, et al. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancy[M]. 7th edition, US: Elsevier, 2017: 309-340.
[2]
Dyson C, Austin T, Lees C. Could routine cardiotocography reduce long term cognitive impairment[J]. BMJ, 2011, 342: d3120.
[3]
Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM, et al. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 2: CD006066.
[4]
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 145: Antepartum Fetal Surveillance[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 124(1): 182-192.
[5]
Lopes-Pereira J, Costa A, Ayres-De-Campos D, et al. Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms and ST signals is associated with significant reductions in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and cesarean delivery: an observational study in 38,466 deliveries[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 220(3): 269.e1-269.e8.
[6]
Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 112: 661-666.
[7]
杨慧霞. 电子胎心监护应用专家共识 [J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2015, 18(7): 486-490.
[8]
Pinas A, Chandraharan E. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2016, 30: 33-47.
[9]
NICE guideline CG190: Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies[J]. Last updated February 2017. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190.
[10]
Chandraharan E, Arulkumaran S. Prevention of birth asphyxia: responding appropriately to cardiotocograph (CTG) traces. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2007, 21(4):609e24.
[11]
Eden RD, Evans MI, Evans SM, et al. The "Fetal Reserve Index" :Re-Engineering the Interpretation and Responses to Fetal Heart Rate Patterns[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2018, 43(2): 90-104.
[12]
Evans MI, Britt DW, Eden RD, et al. The Fetal Reserve Index Significantly Outperforms ACOG Category System in Predicting Cord Blood Base Excess and pH: A Methodological Failure of the Category System[J]. Reprod Sci, 2019 06, 26(6): 858-863.
[13]
Costa A, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa F, et al. Prediction of neonatal acidemia by com-puter analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 201: 464. e1-6.
[14]
Nunes I, Ayres-de-Campos D, Ugwumadu A. Central Fetal Monitoring With and Without Computer Analysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 129(1): 83-90.
[15]
INFANT Collaborative Group. Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2017, 389(10080): 1719-1729.
[16]
Doria V, Papageorghiou AT, Gustafsson A, et al. Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG-ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital[J]. BJOG, 2007, 114(10): 1202-1207.
[17]
Timonen S, Holmberg K. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 218(6): 620.e1-620.e7.
[18]
Landman AJEMC, Immink-Duijker ST, Mulder EJH, et al. Significant reduction in umbilical artery metabolic acidosis after implementation of intrapartum ST waveform analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 221(1): 63.e1-63.e13.
[19]
Olofsson P, Norén H, Carlsson A, et al. Identifying newborns with umbilical cord blood metabolic acidosis by intrapartum cardiotography combined with fetal ECG ST analysis (STAN): comparison of the new and old FIGO systems to classify cardiotocograms[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2020, 33(3): 404-409.
[20]
Puertas A, Góngora J, Valverde, M, et al. Cardiotocography alone vs. cardiotocography with ST segment analysis for intrapartum fetal monitoring in women with late-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2019, 234: 213-217.
文章导航

/