切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (01) : 40 -44. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2016.01.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

单、双胎妊娠并发子痫前期临床分析
匡丽云1, 汤雯婷1, 周燕媚1, 孙雯1, 龚景进1, 李晓梅1, 李秀英1, 陈敦金1,()   
  1. 1. 510150 广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科 广州重症孕产妇救治中心
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-10 出版日期:2016-02-18
  • 通信作者: 陈敦金

Clinical analysis of single or twin pregnancy complicated with preeclampsia

Liyun Kuang1, Wenting Tang1, Yanmei Zhou1, Wen Sun1, Jingjin Gong1, Xiaomei Li1, Xiuying Li1, Dunjin Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, China
  • Received:2015-10-10 Published:2016-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Dunjin Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Dunjin, Email:
引用本文:

匡丽云, 汤雯婷, 周燕媚, 孙雯, 龚景进, 李晓梅, 李秀英, 陈敦金. 单、双胎妊娠并发子痫前期临床分析[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2016, 05(01): 40-44.

Liyun Kuang, Wenting Tang, Yanmei Zhou, Wen Sun, Jingjin Gong, Xiaomei Li, Xiuying Li, Dunjin Chen. Clinical analysis of single or twin pregnancy complicated with preeclampsia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(01): 40-44.

目的

探讨单、双胎妊娠并发子痫前期的临床特点及妊娠结局。

方法

选取2009年1月至2013年4月在广州医科大学附属第三医院产科住院分娩的43例双胎并发子痫前期的孕妇为研究组,362例单胎并发子痫前期产妇作为对照组,回顾性分析两组患者的临床特点及母婴结局的情况。

结果

研究组住院时间(13.28±11.23)d,较对照组(9.48±4.97)d延长,t=2.20,P<0.05。研究组剖宫产率、胎膜早破、产后出血、心力衰竭的发生率分别为97.67%、13.95%、11.63%、11.63%,明显高于对照组(79.83%、5.25%、5.25%和4.14%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组发生新生儿感染和黄疸分别为25.58%和48.84%,高于对照组15.19%和32.60%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

双胎并发子痫前期与单胎并发子痫前期相比,会增加孕产妇的剖宫产、胎膜早破、产后出血、心力衰竭等发生率,同时延长产妇的住院时间。

Objective

To explore the clinical features and pregnancy outcomes of single or twin pregnancy complicated with preeclampsia.

Methods

From January 2009 to April 2013, 405 pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia, who were admitted to the Obstetrics department of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were enrolled in this retrospective study. This study included 43 twin pregnancies in research group and 362 singleton pregnancies in the control group. The clinical features and pregnancy outcomes of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The length of hospital stay in research group and control group were (13.28±11.23) day and (9.48±4.97) day, respectively. There was significant difference in the two groups (t=2.20, P<0.05). In research group, the incidence of cesarean section, premature rupture of membranes, postpartum hemorrhage, heart failure were 97.67%, 13.95%, 11.63% and 11.63%, respectively, which were higher than that in control group (79.83%, 5.25%, 5.25% and 4.14%) with significant difference (P<0.05). In research group, the incidence of newborn infection and jaundice were 25.58% and 48.84%, which were higher than that in control group (15.19% and 32.60%) with significant difference (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared to singleton pregnancy complicated with preeclampsia, twin pregnancy complicated with preeclampsia increased the incidence of cesarean section, premature rupture of membranes, postpartum hemorrhage and heart failure, and extended maternal hospital stay.

表1 两组产妇一般情况的比较
表2 两组孕产妇检查结果的比较(±s)
表3 两组孕产妇的妊娠结局比较
表4 两组患者的围产儿结局比较
[1]
Sugerman HJ. Effect of obesity on incidence of preeclampsia[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 210(4):375.
[2]
Ulkumen B, Silfeler D, Sofuoglu K, et al. The incidence of preeclampsia in ICSI pregnancies[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2014, 30(1):101-105.
[3]
漆洪波. 子痫前期的诊断和子痫的处理:需要规范化[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2015, 18(6): 411-413.
[4]
谢幸,苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013: 121-123.
[5]
李新,崔蓉. 双胎妊娠的分娩方式与妊娠结局233例临床分析[J]. 临床医学,2011, 31(6):21-22.
[6]
谢幸,苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013: 64-71.
[7]
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 2012年我国卫生和计划生育事业发展统计公报[R]. 2013-06-19: 19-20.
[8]
苟文丽,李春芳. 如何降低子痫前期发病率及危害程度[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2012, 28(4):243-244.
[9]
Kumar M, Meena J, Gupta U, et al. Management of early onset severe preeclampsia in a tertiary hospital in India: does expectant management alter-perinatal outcome[J]. Indian J Med Sci, 2011, 65(12):535-542.
[10]
Nanjundan P, Bagga R, Kalra JK, et al. Risk factors for early onset severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia among north Indian women[J]. J Obstet Gynaeco1, 2011, 31(5):384-389.
[11]
李新,崔蓉. 双胎妊娠的分娩方式与妊娠结局233例临床分析[J]. 临床医学,2011, 31(6):21-22.
[12]
Bdolah Y, Lam C, Rajakumar A, et al. Twin pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia:bigger placenta or relative ischemia[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 198(4):428.e1-428.e6.
[13]
廖媛,张静,陈猛,等. 重度子痫前期单双胎不良妊娠结局分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2015, 31(10):771-775.
[14]
Gong YH, Jia J, Lü DH, et al. Outcome and risk factors of early onset severe preeclampsia [J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2012, 125(14):2623-2627.
[15]
Alanis MC, Robinson CJ, Hulsey TC, et al. Early-onset severe preeclampsia: induction of labor vs elective cesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 199(3):262.e1-262.e6.
[16]
Kim LH, Cheng YW, Delaney S, et al. Is preeclampsia associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery if labor is induced?[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2010, 23(5):383-388.
[17]
Samuel A, Lin C, Parviainen K, et al. Expectant management of preeclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension[J]. Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2011, 24(7):907-911.
[18]
Harmon QE, Huang L, Umbach DM, et al. Risk of fetal death with preeclampsia[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 125(3):628-635.
[1] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 范思涵, 叶彩玲, 纪学芹. 产前超声心动图在先天性血管环诊断中的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 37-41.
[2] 何雪威, 谷美玉, 吴亭亭. 超声子宫动脉及子宫内膜血流参数对不明原因复发性流产患者妊娠结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1158-1163.
[3] 杜佳丽, 鲍睿, 乔春红, 韩伟. 中孕期宫颈功能不全孕妇经阴道紧急宫颈环扎术后不良妊娠结局预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 403-409.
[4] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[5] 薛静, 孙雅楠, 朱丽丽, 李淑红. 妊娠期急性脂肪肝孕产妇诊疗及其妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 312-321.
[6] 陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[7] 贾赛君, 张英, 万佳义. 妊娠合并亚临床甲状腺功能减退孕妇的妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[8] 鲁珊, 姚蕴珊, 廖色坭, 陈子恩, 张一剑, 蓝健皓, 魏薇, 刘艳杨, 陈艳红, 陈敦金. 妊娠合并急性阑尾炎100例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
[9] 汪文雁, 郑剑兰, 朱丽慈. 体外受精-胚胎移植术后妊娠患者孕产期风险的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 220-226.
[10] 俞慧慧, 尹宗智. 妊娠期胃穿孔[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 209-213.
[11] 胡淼, 杜丽丽, 张丽姿, 林琳, 张瑜亮, 古士锋, 古仲嘉, 赖思莹, 梁景英, 刘雨, 黄敏珊, 黄媛媛, 黄晴晴, 罗世君, 陈敦金. 体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射受孕患者胎盘植入分级及围产结局的研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 183-189.
[12] 刘文易, 高晓彤, 汤景, 麦卓瑶, 祝丽琼, 陈慧. 体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠合并绒毛膜下血肿患者妊娠结局的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 93-99.
[13] 庄旭, 丁立, 许丽, 张宁, 张羽, 林建华. 慢性肾病孕妇肾脏超声异常与不良妊娠结局的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 100-105.
[14] 徐琦, 彭小芳, 杜涛, 王霞妹, 张蜀宁, 陈曼绮, 郭勤敏, 黄泽薇, 付帅. COL1A2基因变异致胎儿期及成年后成骨不全家系的相关研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 106-111.
[15] 王晓艳, 朱利平, 侯顺玉, 岳永飞. 椎管内分娩镇痛对B族溶血性链球菌阳性孕妇阴道分娩结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 112-116.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?