切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 178 -181. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2016.03.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

高龄妊娠宫内死胎原因分析
龚景进1, 李晓梅1, 李思慧1, 李秀英1, 陈敦金1,()   
  1. 1. 510150 广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科 广州重症孕产妇救治中心
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-22 出版日期:2016-08-18
  • 通信作者: 陈敦金
  • 基金资助:
    广州市教育局协同创新重大项目(13xt04); 广州市科技惠民专项项目(2014Y2-00182); 产科重大疾病防控创新团队(2015KCXTD020)

Analysis of causes of intrauterine fetal death in pregnant women with advanced age

Jingjin Gong1, Xiaomei Li1, Sihui Li1, Xiuying Li1, Dunjin Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical Center for Critical Pregnant Women, Guangzhou 510150, China
  • Received:2016-06-22 Published:2016-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Dunjin Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Dunjin, Email:
引用本文:

龚景进, 李晓梅, 李思慧, 李秀英, 陈敦金. 高龄妊娠宫内死胎原因分析[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2016, 05(03): 178-181.

Jingjin Gong, Xiaomei Li, Sihui Li, Xiuying Li, Dunjin Chen. Analysis of causes of intrauterine fetal death in pregnant women with advanced age[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(03): 178-181.

目的

探讨高龄妊娠孕妇发生宫内死胎的原因。

方法

本研究采用回顾性研究方法对2009年1月1日至2014年12月31日因宫内死胎(单胎)在广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科住院治疗的339例患者临床资料进行分析,根据孕妇分娩年龄分为高龄组(≥35岁)和非高龄组(20~34岁),比较两组孕妇宫内死胎的原因。采用独立样本t检验、χ2检验或Fisher精确概率法对数据进行统计学分析。

结果

高龄妊娠宫内死胎率为1.66%(61/3 670)比非高龄组1.10%(278/25 227)高,χ2=8.670,P=0.003;两组宫内死胎各种病因发生率的比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);高龄组不明原因宫内死胎发生率27.87%(17/61)明显比非高龄组7.55%(21/278)高,χ2=20.74,P=0.000)。

结论

高龄妊娠孕妇发生宫内死胎风险比非高龄者高,需加强对高龄妊娠人群孕期母胎监测。

Objective

To explore the causes of intrauterine fetal death in pregnancy women with advanced age.

Methods

Clinical data of 339 intrauterine fetal deaths (single fetus) were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were admitted to the obstetrics and gynecology department at The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2014. According to the age of pregnant woman at deliver, the cases were divided into advanced age group (≥35 years) or and non-advanced age group (20-34 years). The causes of intrauterine fetal deaths were compared between the two groups. Independent sample t test, Chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test were used for statistical analysis.

Results

The incidence of intrauterine fetal death was higher in advanced age group when compared with non-advanced age group [1.66% (61/3 670) vs. 1.10% (278/25 227), χ2=8.670, P=0.003]. There were no significant differences of maternal complications incidences between the two groups (all P vales more than 0.05). The rates of unknown factors of intrauterine fetal death in advanced age group and non-advanced age group were [27.87% (17/61) and 7.55% (21/278) respectively, χ2=20.74, P=0.000].

Conclusion

Pregnancy women with advanced age present a higher risk of intrauterine fetal death than the non-advanced ones, so strengthen the maternal-fetal monitoring of pregnancy women with advanced age.

图1 2009年至2014年高龄妊娠比例
表1 高龄组与非高龄组孕妇一般情况的比较
表2 两组宫内死胎病因的比较
[1]
Waldenström U. Postponing parenthood to advanced age [J]. Ups J Med Sci, 2016, 6: 1-9.
[2]
Sauer MV. Reproduction at an advanced maternal age and maternal health [J]. Fertil Steril, 2015, 103(5): 1136-1143.
[3]
Walker KF, Bugg GJ, Macpherson M, et al. Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35 years of age or older [J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 374(9): 813-822.
[4]
Oakley L, Penn N, Pipi M, et al. Risk of Adverse Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes by Maternal Age: Quantifying Individual and Population Level Risk Using Routine UK Maternity Data [J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(10): e0164462.
[5]
Christiansen-Lindquist L, Sahay K, Hogue CJ. Improving surveillance for the hidden half of fetal-infant mortality: a pilot study of the expansion of the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system to include stillbirth [J]. Ann Epidemiol, 2016, 26(6): 401-404
[6]
谢辛,苟文丽. 妇产科学 [M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013: 98-99.
[7]
杨惠娟,刘凤洁,刘凯波,等. 北京市多胎妊娠发生趋势及"普二"政策影响因素分析 [J]. 中国妇幼保健,2016, 31(17): 3445-3447.
[8]
Vanya M, Szili K, Devosa I, et al. Risk of maternal and fetal disease among women older than 40 years [J]. Orv Hetil, 2015, 156(49): 1987-1990.
[9]
刘晓莉,阮炎,刘亚君,等. 14省、市、自治区妇女妊娠年龄与妊娠期高血压疾病关系的探讨 [J]. 中华医学杂志,2015, 95(1): 19-22.
[10]
李东明,林飞,徐钰琪,等. 南宁地区19165例孕妇唐氏综合征干预研究 [J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志,2014, 22(12): 61-62.
[11]
Waldenström U, Cnattingius S, Norman M, et al. Advanced Maternal Age and Stillbirth Risk in Nulliparous and Parous Women [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 126(2): 355-362.
[12]
Lamminpää R, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes of overweight and obese women aged 35 years or older-A registry-based study in Finland [J]. Obes Res Clin Pract, 2016, 10(2): 133-142.
[13]
McClure EM, Garces A, Saleem S, et al. Global Network for Women′s and Children′s Health Research: probable causes of stillbirth in low-and middle-income countries using a prospectively defined classification system [J]. BJOG, 2017, doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14493. [Epub ahead of print]
[14]
Kidanto H, Msemo G, Mmbando D, et al. Predisposing factors associated with stillbirth in Tanzania. [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2015, 130(1): 70-73.
[15]
Warland J, O′Brien LM, Heazell AE, et al. An international internet survey of the experiences of 1,714 mothers with a late stillbirth: the STARS cohort study [J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2015, 15: 172.
[1] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 张锦丽, 席毛毛, 褚志刚, 栾夏刚, 陈诺, 王德运, 谢卫国. 大面积烧伤患者发生早期急性肾损伤的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 282-287.
[4] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[5] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[6] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[7] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[8] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[9] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[10] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[11] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[12] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[13] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?