| [1] |
Treacy B, Smith C, Rayburn W, Ultrasound in labor and delivery[J]. Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 1990, 45(4):213-219.
|
| [2] |
Andersen HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SD, et al. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length[J]．Am J Obstet Gynaeco, 1990, 163(3):859-867.
|
| [3] |
Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 37(1):116-126.
|
| [4] |
Larma JD, Iams JD. Is sonographic assessment of the cervix necessary and helpful?[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 55(1):324-335.
|
| [5] |
Berghella V, Palacio M, Ness A, et al. Cervical length screening for prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnancy with threatened preterm labor: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 49(3):322-329.
|
| [6] |
Greco E, Gupta R, Syngelaki A, et al.First-trimester screening for spontaneous preterm delivery with maternal characteristics and cervical length[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2012, 31(3):154-161.
|
| [7] |
Saito M, Kozuma S, Kikuchi A, et al. Sonographic assessment of the cervix before, during and after a uterine contraction is effective in predicting the course of labor[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 22(6):604-608.
|
| [8] |
Molina FS, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound in labor and delivery[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2010, 27(2):61-67.
|
| [9] |
Verhoeven CJ, Opmeer BC, Oei SG, et al. Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length and wedging for predicting outcome of labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]．Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 42(5):500-508.
|
| [10] |
Gabriel R, Darnaud T, Chalot F, et al. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction[J]．Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 19(3):254-257.
|
| [11] |
Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Suguna S, et alTransvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 29(5):568-573.
|
| [12] |
Rovas L, Sladkevicius P, Strobel E, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the cervix for predicting time to spontaneous onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 28(3):306-311.
|
| [13] |
Lim K, Butt K, Crane JM, et al. Ultrasonographic cervical length assessment in predicting preterm birth in singleton pregnancies[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2011, 33(5):486-499.
|
| [14] |
Drassinower D, Vink J, Pessel C, et al. Effect of cervical cerclage on rate of cervical shortening[J]．Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 46(6):718-723.
|
| [15] |
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists′ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 171: Management of Preterm Labor[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 128(4):e155-e164.
|
| [16] |
Zhang N, Chen H, Xu Z, et al. Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patient with previous cesarean scar[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2016, 22:3288-3295.
|
| [17] |
Fonda J. Ultrasound diagnosis of caesarean scar defects[J]. Australas J Ultrasound Med, 2011, 14(3):22-30.
|
| [18] |
Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, et al. JurkovicDeficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 31(1):72-77.
|
| [19] |
Bharatam KK. Cesarean section uterine scar dehiscence-A review[J]. Uterus & Ovary, 2015, 1(e751):1-4.
|
| [20] |
Qureshi B, Inafuku K, Oshima K, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment to predict the integrity and quality of cesarean scar during pregnancy: a prospective study[J]. Tohoku J Exp Med, 1997, 183(1):55-65.
|
| [21] |
Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, et al. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 201(3):320.e1-320.e6.
|
| [22] |
Kushtagi P, Garepalli S. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2011, 283(3):455-459.
|
| [23] |
Naji O, Daemen A, Smith A, et al. Changes in cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(5):556-562.
|
| [24] |
Uharcek P, Brestansky A, Ravinger J, et al. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery[J]．Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015, 292(3):609-612.
|
| [25] |
Barzilay E, Shay A, Lahav-Ezra H, et al. Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar-a prospective study[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2017:1-4.
|
| [26] |
Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. National Institute of Child, N. Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units, Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery[J]．N Engl J Med, 2004, 351(25):2581-2589.
|
| [27] |
Nahum GG, Pham KQ. Rupture in Pregnancy[J/OL]. 2016.
URL
|
| [28] |
Naji O, Daemen A, Smith A, et al. Visibility and measurement of cesarean section scars in pregnancy: a reproducibility study[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 40(5):549-556.
|
| [29] |
Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, et al. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 28(6):753-760.
|
| [30] |
Choi SK, Park YG, Lee da H, et al. Sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during labor for the prediction of labor dystocia and perinatal outcomes, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies[J]. the International Society of Perinatal Obstet, 2016, 29(24):3988-3992.
|
| [31] |
Levy R, Zaks S, Ben-Arie A, et al. Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery?[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 40(3):332-337.
|
| [32] |
Amina MA, Eltomey MA, El-Dorf AA. Role of transperineal ultrasound measurements in women with prolonged second stage of labor as predictors of the mode of delivery[J]．The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 2014, 45(4):1295-1299.
|
| [33] |
Omar K, Elsayed E, Mahmoud A, et al. Assessment of the progress of labor by the use of intrapartum ultrasound[J]．Alexandria Journal of Medicine, 2012, 48(4):295-301.
|
| [34] |
Surendran P, Puliyathinkal S. Clinical study on progress of labor using ultra sound during parturition: Analysis of 71 patients[J]．International Journal of Scientific Study, 2017, 5(2):25-28.
|
| [35] |
Maulik D. Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology [M]. 2nd ed., Springer, 2005.
|
| [36] |
Urban G, Vergani P, Ghidini A, et al. State of the art: non-invasive ultrasound assessment of the uteroplacental circulation[J]. Semin Perinatol, 2007, 31(4):232-239.
|
| [37] |
Ghosh G, Breborowicz A, Brazert M, et al. Evaluation of third trimester uterine artery flow velocity indices in relationship to perinatal complications[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2006, 19(9):551-555.
|
| [38] |
Nagar T, Sharma D, Choudhary M, et al. The role of uterine and umbilical arterial doppler in high-risk pregnancy: A prospective observational study from India[J]. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health, 2015, 9:1-5.
|
| [39] |
Barati M, Shahbazian N, Ahmadi L, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of uterine artery Doppler sonography for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. J Res Med Sci, 2014, 19(6):515-519.
|
| [40] |
Moon AE. Using S/D ratios to predict fetal outcome[J]. J Diagn Med Sonogr, 1999, 15(2):59-64.
|
| [41] |
Byun YJ, Kim HS, Yang JI, et al. Umbilical artery Doppler study as a predictive marker of perinatal outcome in preterm small for gestational age infants[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2009, 50(1):39-44.
|
| [42] |
Salihagic-Kadic A, Medic M, Jugovic D, et al. Fetal cerebrovascular response to chronic hypoxia－－implications for the prevention of brain damage[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2006, 19(7):387-396.
|
| [43] |
Harris AD, Murphy K, Diaz CM, et al. Cerebral blood flow response to acute hypoxic hypoxia[J]. NMR Biomed, 2013, 26(12):1844-1852.
|
| [44] |
Akolekar R, Sarno L, Wright A, et al. Fetal middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery pulsatility index: effects of maternal characteristics and medical history[J]．Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 45(4):402-408.
|
| [45] |
Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Gallo DM, et al. Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler at 35－37 weeks′ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 46(1):82-92.
|
| [46] |
DeVore GR. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 213(1):5-15.
|
| [47] |
Arabin B, Goerges J, Bilardo CM. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 214(2):298-299.
|
| [48] |
Maged AM, Abdelhafez A, Al Mostafa W, et al. Fetal middle cerebral and umbilical artery Doppler after 40 weeks gestational age[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2014, 27(18):1880-1885.
|
| [49] |
Loureiro T, Montenegro N, Campos DA. Multivessel Doppler assessment and Doppler myocardial performance index (Tei index) during labor[J]．Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 30(4):426.
|