切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 20 -25. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2025.01.005

瘢痕子宫再妊娠系列问题

瘢痕子宫再妊娠并发症预测模型的研究进展
洪凡1, 王志坚1,()   
  1. 1. 510150 广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科广东省产科重大疾病重点实验室 广东省妇产疾病临床医学研究中心 粤港澳母胎医学高校联合实验室
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-15 出版日期:2025-02-18
  • 通信作者: 王志坚
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82271709)广东省自然科学基金(2023A1515010207)

Research progress on predictive models for complications of recurrent pregnancy in scarred uterus

Fan Hong, Zhijian Wang()   

  • Received:2024-08-15 Published:2025-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Zhijian Wang
引用本文:

洪凡, 王志坚. 瘢痕子宫再妊娠并发症预测模型的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 20-25.

Fan Hong, Zhijian Wang. Research progress on predictive models for complications of recurrent pregnancy in scarred uterus[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2025, 14(01): 20-25.

随着我国生育政策的调整,瘢痕子宫再次妊娠的孕妇明显增加,瘢痕子宫再次妊娠时出现子宫瘢痕妊娠、前置胎盘、胎盘植入和子宫破裂等发生率呈上升趋势,严重威胁母儿生命安全。本文对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠的并发症预测模型进行了讨论,旨在为临床提供风险评估的方法,以更好地降低孕期风险和获得良好妊娠结局。

With the adjustment of China′s fertility policies, the number of pregnant women with a scarred uterus who are undergoing a subsequent pregnancy has significantly increased. In such cases, the incidence of complications like uterine scar pregnancy, placenta previa, placenta accreta, and uterine rupture is on the rise, posing a threat to both maternal and fetal safety. This article discusses predictive models for complications in subsequent pregnancies with a scarred uterus, aiming to provide methods for assessing the risks of these complications in order to reduce pregnancy-related risks and achieve favorable pregnancy outcomes.

[1]
Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Dessalegn YM, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections[J].Lancet,2018,392(10155):1341-1348.
[2]
Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2017,24(5):731-738.
[3]
张艺珊, 顾向应. 瘢痕子宫再次妊娠的全程管理[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,11(5):5-8.
[4]
Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2006,107(6):1373-1381.
[5]
Maymon R, Svirsky R, Smorgick N, et al. Fertility performance and obstetric outcomes among women with previous cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. J Ultrasound Med,2011,30(9):1179-1184.
[6]
Calì G, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, et al.Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly:systematic review and meta-analysis [ J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2018,51(2):169-175.
[7]
Zhang C, Zhang Y, He J, et al. Outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in patients following treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with high intensity focused ultrasound followed by ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage[J]. Int J Hyperthermia,2019,36(1):926-931.
[8]
Litwicka K, Greco E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2013,25(6):456-461.
[9]
Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Liu X, et al. Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2021,303(2):321-328.
[10]
山东省医学会计划生育分会, 班艳丽, 赵颖,等. 剖宫产子宫瘢痕妊娠实用临床分型诊治专家共识[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版),2023,61(11):1-10.
[11]
Ban Y, Shen J, Wang X, et al. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy clinical classification system with recommended surgical strategy[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2023,141(5):927-936.
[12]
李高振, 高玉霞, 杨月华. 影响剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术中大出血发生的高危因素分析及风险预测模型构建[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,10(10):30-34.
[13]
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta [J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2014,44(3):346-353.
[14]
Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG, et al. Placenta praevia and placenta accreta: diagnosis and management: green-top guideline No. 27a[J]. BJOG,2019,126(1):e1-48.
[15]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 前置胎盘的诊断与处理指南(2020)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2020,55(1):3-8.
[16]
刘维芳, 邹丽. 瘢痕子宫再次妊娠的并发症管理[J/CD]. 中华产科急救电子杂志,2020,9(2):78-82.
[17]
Berkley EM, Abuhamad AZ. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: is sonography all we need? [J]. J Ultrasound Med,2013,32(8):1345-1350.
[18]
EI Gelany S, Mosbeh MH, Ibrahim EM, et al. Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders: incidence, risk factors and outcomes of different management strategies in a tertiary referral hospital in Minia, Egypt: a prospective study [ J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2019,19(1):313.
[19]
Luo L, Sun Q,Ying D, et al. Scoring system for the prediction of the severity of placenta accrete spectrum in women with placenta previa: a prospective observational study [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2019,300(3):783-791.
[20]
邱夏, 李蕊, 王琦, 等. 中孕期胎盘下缘到宫颈内口距离对前置胎盘的预测价值[J]. 中国医师杂志,2022,24(2):236-239,245.
[21]
Chen C, Liu X, Chen D, et al. A risk model to predict severe postpartum hemorrhage in patients with placenta previa: a singlecenter retrospective study[J]. Ann Palliat Med,2019,8(5):611-621.
[22]
陈敦金, 孙雯. 积极开展胎盘植入性疾病的预测,提高胎盘植入性疾病诊治水平[J]. 中国医师杂志,2023,25(9):1281-1284.
[23]
Shi XM, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Effect of primary elective cesarean delivery on placenta accreta: a case-control study[J].Chin Med J (Engl),2018,131(6):672-676.
[24]
Shi XM, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Effect of primary elective cesarean delivery on placenta accreta: a case-control study[J].Chin Med J (Engl),2018,131(6):672-676.
[25]
Jauniaux E, D′Antonio F, Bhide A, et al. Modified Delphi study of ultrasound signs associated with placenta accreta spectrum[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2023,61(4):518-525.
[26]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组, 中国医师协会妇产科分会母胎医学专委会. 胎盘植入性疾病诊断和处理指南(2023)[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2023,26(8):617-627.
[27]
Boroomand Fard M,Kasraeian M,Vafaei H,et al. Introducing an efficient model for the prediction of placenta accreta spectrum using the MCP regression approach based on sonography indexes:how efficient is sonography in diagnosing accreta? [J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2020,20(1):111.
[28]
种轶文, 张爱青, 王妍, 等. 超声评分系统预测胎盘植入凶险程度的价值[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(9):705-709.
[29]
Gao Y, Gao X, Cai J, et al. Prediction of placenta accreta spectrum by a scoring system based on maternal characteristics combined with ultrasonographic features[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol,2021,60(6):1011-1017.
[30]
Hong S, Le Y, Lio KU, et al. Performance comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in their diagnostic accuracy of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Insights Imaging,2022,13(1):50.
[31]
曾桔, 谢欢. 胎盘植入的MRI 诊断进展[J]. 医学影像学杂志,2018,28(9):1570-1573.
[32]
王媛媛, 陈练, 赵扬玉. 利用影像学指标判断胎盘植入患者不良妊娠结局[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2020,36(5):416-419.
[33]
Shazly SA, Hortu I, Shih JC, et al. Prediction of success of uterus-preserving management in women with placenta accreta spectrum (CON-PAS score): a multicenter international study[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2021,154(2):304-311.
[34]
Zhang T, Wang S. Potential serum biomarkers in prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum[J]. Front Med (Lausanne),2022,9:860186.
[35]
刘喆, 杨慧霞, 辛虹, 等. 全国多中心子宫破裂现状调查及结局分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2019,54(6):363-368.
[36]
ACOG. Practice bulletin No. 184 vaginal birth after cesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2017,130(5):e217-233.
[37]
单可记, 王名芳, 许汪斌, 等. 妊娠期完全性子宫破裂105 例临床分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2019,35(10):769-774.
[38]
庄璟怡, 应豪. 妊娠期子宫破裂的早期识别[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2023,39(4):406-411.
[39]
Zhan W,Zhu J,Hua X,et al. Epidemiology of uterine rupture among pregnant women in China and development of a risk prediction model: analysis of data from a multicentre, crosssectional study[J]. BMJ Open,2021,11(11):e054540.
[40]
“高龄产妇妊娠期并发症防治策略研究”项目专家组. 高龄妇女瘢痕子宫再妊娠管理专家共识(2021年版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2021,37(5):558-563.
[41]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩管理的专家共识(2016)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2016,51(8):561-564.
[42]
Vimercati A,Dellino M,Crupano FM,et al. Ultrasonic assessment of cesarean section scar to vesicovaginal fold distance: an instrument to estimate pre-labor uterine rupture risk[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2022,35(22):4370-4374.
[43]
王林林, 陈俊雅, 杨慧霞, 等. 妊娠期子宫瘢痕情况与剖宫产术后再次妊娠孕妇发生子宫破裂的相关性[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2019,54(6):375-380.
[44]
邢少宁, 符爱贞. 前壁下段瘢痕子宫形态结构改变的全容积超声观察对先兆子宫破裂的预测应用价值分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2019,34(9):2159-2162.
[45]
Tanos V, Toney ZA. Uterine scar rupture-prediction, prevention,diagnosis, and management[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2019,59:115-131.
[1] 阚光娟, 孙立群, 王敏言, 李俨育, 谭艳娟, 仇玉轩, 潘淑淑, 朱江. 宫颈胃型腺癌的多模态影像学表现[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1030-1041.
[2] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 张涛, 赵胜, 张莉. 阴道斜隔综合征的超声诊断与临床分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[3] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[4] 侯宏义, 谢松涛, 何香, 张楠, 官浩. 股薄肌岛状复合组织瓣结合局部瘢痕筋膜瓣对修复窦腔型Ⅳ期坐骨结节压力性损伤的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(01): 1-6.
[5] 吉玉洁, 尚培中, 王金, 张伟, 聂阿娜, 胡玮, 张丹, 王晓梅. 原位保留瘘口处肠段回肠盲肠Overlap吻合预防回肠阴道瘘复发一例报道[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 235-236.
[6] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[7] 李鑫, 李乐, 陈金明, 刘蕊. 基于Meta 分析构建肝癌微血管侵犯的术前预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 74-80.
[8] 任船, 葛荣忠, 邱正才, 朱莉. 肠癌患者术后代谢性酸中毒的预测模型构建及应用价值评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 34-39.
[9] 张旭, 汪黎, 张宇, 丁杰. PH 超敏感聚合物纳米囊共溶体DOX和Navitoclax 在子宫内膜癌中的体内协同抗癌作用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(11): 1030-1036.
[10] 石珊, 徐志刚, 魏双, 官浩, 石继红. 创面病原体在创面愈合与瘢痕形成中的作用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(10): 955-960.
[11] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[12] 周倩, 高劲松. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫再妊娠的孕期监测和风险管理[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 15-19.
[13] 吴章鑫, 吴郁. 瘢痕子宫再妊娠的孕前评估与处理[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 8-14.
[14] 谭娅, 鲁力. 不孕症女性四维子宫输卵管超声造影检查后自然妊娠相关因素的Cox 回归分析[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 26-31.
[15] 张茜茹, 袁迎雪, 曹智新. 巨大多房囊性子宫平滑肌瘤的诊断学特征并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 32-37.
阅读次数
全文


摘要