切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 95 -101. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2025.02.006

论著

复发性子痫前期临床特征及影响因素分析
王伟伟1, 李霞林1, 龚景进2, 孙雯1, 张丽姿1, 王永1,()   
  1. 1. 广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科 广东省产科重大疾病重点实验室 广东省妇产疾病临床医学研究中心 粤港澳母胎医学高校联合实验室,广州 510150
    2. 广州市番禺区妇幼保健院,广州 511402
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-23 出版日期:2025-05-18
  • 通信作者: 王永
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(C2022104)广东省自然科学基金(2022A1515012405,2025A1515012340)广州市科技计划市校(院)联合(2023A03J0380)

Analysis of clinical characteristics and influencing factors in recurrent preeclampsia

Weiwei Wang1, Xialin Li1, Jingjin Gong2, Wen Sun1, Lizhi Zhang1, Yong Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,The Third Affiliated Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases,Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology,Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine,Guangzhou 510150,China
    2. Guangzhou Panyu District Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Guangzhou 511402,China
  • Received:2024-08-23 Published:2025-05-18
  • Corresponding author: Yong Wang
引用本文:

王伟伟, 李霞林, 龚景进, 孙雯, 张丽姿, 王永. 复发性子痫前期临床特征及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 95-101.

Weiwei Wang, Xialin Li, Jingjin Gong, Wen Sun, Lizhi Zhang, Yong Wang. Analysis of clinical characteristics and influencing factors in recurrent preeclampsia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2025, 14(02): 95-101.

目的

分析复发性子痫前期(preeclampsia,PE)患者临床症状,探讨其发病影响因素,为复发性PE的预防与治疗提供依据。

方法

收集2010年6月至2021年12月广州医科大附属第三医院和广州市番禺区妇幼保健院收治的574例PE患者完整资料,根据再次妊娠时是否发生PE分为复发组(132例)和未复发组(442例),采用卡方检验、t检验或秩和检验对比两组患者临床资料、妊娠特征,并采用logistic回归模型分析子痫前期复发的危险因素。

结果

(1)PE复发率为23.0%;(2)复发组本次妊娠年龄高于未复发组[(32.92±4.14)岁与(30.81±4.29)岁,t= -4.982],入院孕周[(36.36±3.12)周与(37.96±2.25)周,t=6.493]、分娩孕周[(36.73±2.87)周与(38.19±2.10)周,t=6.377]均低于未复发组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者阴道分娩分别为31.8%与43.1%、剖宫产分娩分别为68.2% 与56.9%(χ2=5.355),差异有统计学差异(P<0.05);(3)复发组更容易发生腹水4.5%与0.2%(χ2=15.706)、上腹不适2.3%与0.2%(χ2=6.143),差异有均统计学意义(P<0.05);(4)复发组白细胞数量高于未复发组[(9.85±2.14)×109/L与(9.2±2.2)×109/L,t= -2.122],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(5)复发组新生儿出生体重[(2 760.0±830.0)g与(3 120.0±540.0)g,t=5.867]、Apgar评分[1 min(9.51±1.56)分与(9.79±1.11)分,t=2.299;5 min(9.70±1.35)分与(9.88±0.97)分,t=1.697],胎儿生长受限的发生率更高(6.9%与2.0%,χ2=7.738),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),新生儿死亡率明显高于未复发组(9.1%与3.8%);(6)复发组前次妊娠血压升高起始孕周及入院孕周均早于未复发组,分别为[(33.85±5.35)周与(36.64±3.83)周,t=36.531]和[(35.56±4.46)周与(37.44±3.04)周,t=42.792],前次妊娠孕期最高收缩压[(165.1±13.8)mmHg与(156.1±13.4)mmHg,t= -5.508]、最高舒张压[(106.2±11.9)mmHg与(100.4±10.4)mmHg,t= -4.463]均高于未复发组,非首次妊娠的占比(46.2%与36.7%,t=7.66)明显多于未复发组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);(7)Logistic回归分析显示,年龄(OR=1.18,95%CI:1.03~1.35)、前次妊娠孕期最高收缩压(OR=1.05,95%CI:1.01~1.08,P<0.05)、前次妊娠年龄(OR=1.23,95%CI:1.16~1.37,P<0.05)、前次妊娠分娩孕周(OR=1.32,95%CI:1.23~1.39,P<0.05)、前次妊娠期尿蛋白(OR=2.59,95%CI:1.01~6.64,P<0.05)是孕妇PE复发的危险因素,前次血压升高起始孕周是PE复发的保护因素(OR=0.89,95%CI:0.82~0.97,P<0.05)。

结论

复发性PE具有一定临床特征,孕妇年龄、前次妊娠孕期最高收缩压、前次妊娠年龄、前次妊娠分娩孕周、前次妊娠期尿蛋白是复发性PE的危险因素。前次妊娠血压升高起始孕周是复发性PE的保护因素。

Objective

To analyze the clinical symptoms of patients with recurrent preeclampsia(PE)and explore the influencing factors of its onset,thereby providing a basis for the prevention and treatment of recurrent PE.

Methods

Complete data of 574 patients with PE admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and Guangzhou Panyu District Maternal and Child Health Hospital from June 2010 to December 2021 were collected.Patients were divided into a recurrence group(132 cases)and a nonrecurrence group(442 cases)based on whether PE occurred during a second pregnancy.The clinical data and pregnancy characteristics of the two groups were compared using the chisquare test,t-test,or rank sum test.Logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for PE recurrence.

Results

(1)The recurrence rate of PE was 23.0%;(2)The age of pregnancy in the recurrent group was higher than that in the non recurrent group[(32.92±4.14)years vs(30.81±4.29)years,t= -4.982],while the gestational weeks at admission[(36.36±3.12)weeks vs(37.96±2.25)weeks,t=6.493]and delivery[(36.73±2.87)weeks vs(38.19±2.10)weeks,t=6.377]were lower than those in the non-recurrent group,with statistical significance(P<0.05);The vaginal delivery rates were 31.8% vs.43.1%,and cesarean delivery rates were 68.2% vs.56.9% in the two groups,respectively(χ2=5.355),demonstrating statistically significant differences(P<0.05).(3)The recurrence group demonstrated significantly higher incidences of both ascites(4.5% vs 0.2%,χ2=15.706)and epigastric discomfort(2.3% vs 0.2%,χ2=6.143),with all differences being statistically significant(P<0.05).(4)The white blood cell count in the recurrent group was higher than that in the non-recurrent group[(9.85±2.14)×109/L vs(9.2±2.2)×109/L,t= -2.122],and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).(5)The birth weight[(2 760.0±830.0)g vs(3 120.0±540.0)g,t=5.867]and Apgar score of newborns[1 min:(9.51±1.56)vs(9.79±1.11),t=2.299;5 min:(9.70±1.35)vs(9.88±0.97),t=1.697]in the recurrent group were significantly lower than those in the non-recurrent group,and the incidence of fetal growth restriction was higher(6.9%vs2.0%,χ2=7.738),with statistical significance(P<0.05).The neonatal mortality rate was significantly higher than that of the non-recurrence group(9.1% vs 3.8%).(6)The recurrence group had an increase in blood pressure in the previous pregnancy[(33.85±5.35)weeks vs(36.64±3.83)weeks,t=36.531]and the gestational age at admission[(35.56±4.46)weeks vs(37.44±3.04)weeks,t=42.792)]was earlier than the non-recurrence group,while the highest systolic blood pressure[(165.1±13.8)mmHg vs(156.1±13.4)mmHg,t= -5.508]and maximum diastolic blood pressure[(106.2±11.9)mmHg vs(100.4±10.4)mmHg,t= -4.463]was higher than that of the nonrecurrence group,and the proportion of non-first pregnancies(46.2% vs 36.7%,t=7.66)was significantly higher than that of the non-recurrence group(P<0.05).(7)Logistic regression analysis showed that age(OR=1.18,95%CI:1.03~1.35),highest systolic blood pressure during the previous pregnancy(OR=1.05,95%CI:1.01~1.08,P<0.05),age of the previous pregnancy(OR=1.23,95%CI:1.16~1.37,P<0.05),gestational age of the previous delivery(OR=1.32,95%CI:1.23~1.39,P<0.05),and urinary protein during the previous pregnancy(OR=2.59,95%CI:1.01~6.64,P<0.05)were risk factors for PE recurrence in pregnant women.The starting gestational age of the previous increase in blood pressure(OR=0.89,95%CI:0.82~0.97,P<0.05)was a protective factor for PE recurrence.

Conclusions

Recurrent PE has certain clinical characteristics.The maternal age,highest systolic blood pressure during the previous pregnancy,age of the previous pregnancy,gestational age of the previous pregnancy,and urinary protein during the previous pregnancy are risk factors for recurrent PE.The initial gestational age of the previous pregnancy with elevated blood pressure is a protective factor for recurrent PE.

表1 两组患者一般情况比较
表2 两组患者临床症状和并发症的比较[例(%)]
表3 两组患者分娩前实验室各项检测指标比较
表4 两组患者新生儿情况比较
表5 两组患者前次妊娠临床资料比较
表6 复发性PE危险因素logistic回归分析
[1]
Jimmy E,Alex V,Christian M,et al.Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia:ACOG Practice Bulletin Summary,Number 222[J].Obstet Gynecol,2020,135(6):1492-1495.
[2]
Li F,Qin J,Zhang S,Chen L,et al.Prevalence of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in China:a systematic review and metaanalysis[J].Pregnancy Hypertension,2021,24:13-21.
[3]
Barton JR,Sibai BM.Prediction and prevention of recurrent preeclampsia[J].Obstet Gynecol,2008,112(2 Pt 1):359-372.
[4]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组.妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2020,55(4):227-238.
[5]
Bijl RC, Cornette J, Brewer AN, et al. Patient-reported preconceptional characteristics in the prediction of recurrent preeclampsia[J].Pregnancy Hypertens,2022,28:44-50.
[6]
Ives CW, Sinkey R, Rajapreyar I, et al. Preeclampsiapathophysiology and clinical presentations:JACC state-of-the-art review[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2020,76(14):1690-1702.
[7]
Chaiworapongsa T,Chaemsaithong P,Yeo L,et al.Preeclampsia part 1:current understanding of its pathophysiology[J].Nat Rev Nephrol,2014,10(8):466-480.
[8]
赫英东,陈倩.复发性子痫前期[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2021,37(02):145-149.
[9]
Giannubilo SR,Landi B,Ciavattini A.Preeclampsia:what could happen in a subsequent pregnancy?[J].Obstet Gynecol Surv,2014,69(12):747-762.
[10]
Cormick G,Betrán AP,Ciapponi A,et al.Inter-pregnancy interval and risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia:systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Reprod Health,2016,13(1):83.
[11]
孙雯,王晓怡,余琳,等.复发性子痫前期影响因素分析[J/OL].中华产科急救电子杂志,2021,10(2):101-104.
[12]
Tran PL,Robillard PY,Dumont C,Schweizer C,et al.Recurrent or first preeclampsia in multiparae:a case-control study of singleton pregnancies in Reunion Island[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2019,240:80-86.
[13]
Davidesko S,Sacks KN,Friger M,et al.Prenatal exposure to preeclampsia as a risk factor for long-term endocrine morbidity of the offspring[J].Hypertension in Pregnancy,2020,40(2):1-8.
[14]
Mostello D,Kallogjeri D,Tungsiripat R,et al.Recurrence of preeclampsia:effects of gestational age at delivery of the first pregnancy,body mass index,paternity,and interval between births[J].Am JObstet Gynecol,2008,199(1):55.e1-55.e7.
[15]
Facchinetti F,Marozio L,Frusca T,et al.Maternal thrombophilia and the risk of recurrence of preeclampsia[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,200(1):46.e1-46.e5.
[16]
Stekkinger E,Scholten R,van der Vlugt MJ,et al.Metabolic syndrome and the risk for recurrent pre-eclampsia:a retrospective cohort study[J].BJOG,2013,120(8):979-986.
[17]
Bergman L,Thorgeirsdottir L,Elden H,et al. Cognitive impairment in preeclampsia complicated by eclampsia and pulmonary edema after delivery[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2021,100(7):1280-1287.
[18]
Zhang JZ,He J.Risk factors of recurrent preeclampsia and its relation to maternal and offspring outcome[J].Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban,2015,44(3):258-263.
[19]
Ciloglu E,Okcu NT,Dogan N?.Optical coherence tomography angiography findings in preeclampsia[J].Eye(Lond),2019,33(12):1946-1951.
[20]
Ishiyama S,Mochizuki K,Shinohara R,et al.Association of maternal leukocyte, monocyte, and neutrophil counts with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy:the Japan Environment and Children's Study(JECS)[J].Sci Rep,2024,14(1):7248.
[21]
Nachshon S,Hadar E,Bardin R,et al.The association between chronic liver diseases and preeclampsia[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2022,22(1):500.
[22]
Auger N,Fraser WD,Schnitzer M,et al.Recurrent preeclampsia and subsequent cardiovascular risk[J].Heart,2017,103(3):235-243.
[23]
生殖健康及重大出生缺陷防控研究,高龄产妇妊娠期并发症防治策略研究项目组.子痫前期防治的集束化管理建议[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2022,38(5):534-537.
[1] 明昊, 宋宏萍, 白誉誉, 党晓智, 赵阳, 程燕妮, 王琪, 肖迎聪. 自动乳腺超声联合临床病理特征预测Luminal B 型乳腺癌术后复发风险的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(04): 337-347.
[2] 王珂, 岳育民, 武珍珍, 许泽宇, 惠晓辉, 赵云, 窦维佳, 赵青川. 腹腔镜经自然腔道手术对结直肠癌患者肠道功能及远期效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 413-416.
[3] 袁强, 向文瑞, 吕远, 闫璋哲, 朱含放, 陈光, 孙亮, 陈纲, 赵锁. 基于随机生存森林的胃肠道间质瘤无复发生存期预测模型研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 438-441.
[4] 赵晨皓, 张序东, 杨浚沫, 周何. 血清肿瘤标志物对结直肠癌患者术后复发的预测效能研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 467-470.
[5] 李健雄, 周江, 李涛, 乔培宇, 汤鑫, 董明. 两种不同保脾胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾肿瘤的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 325-328.
[6] 王占奎, 陈治远, 孙闻晖, 杨庆玲, 杨小斌. 术前免疫炎症指数及AFU水平对肝癌患者介入术后早期复发的预测研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 247-250.
[7] 李华志, 孙海涛, 曹广, 张雅静. 基于膜解剖的完整系膜切除+D2根治术在进展期胃癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 262-265.
[8] 詹文豪, 吾米尔·吾斯曼江, 刘仁, 曾小兰, 陈俊星, 王宗任. 经尿道膀胱肿瘤整块切除术与电切术治疗高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 309-314.
[9] 廖俊豪, 周理林, 曾健文. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第25期)——膀胱癌根治术后盆腔复发[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 390-394.
[10] 韩亮, 叶云翔, 张玉艳, 张世科, 周高翔, 周宇豪, 李舒珏, 曾滔, 曾国华, 乔庐东, 吴文起. 上尿路结石合并尿真菌培养阳性患者的诊治经验[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 340-345.
[11] 李永红, 王骏, 肖恒军. 2025-NCCN前列腺癌诊治指南更新解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 129-133.
[12] 郑秉礼, 彭洁, 孟塬. KRAS基因突变对可切除胰腺癌临床预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 456-462.
[13] 曹聪, 董伟, 徐良斌, 付雍. 成人肝母细胞瘤长期存活一例[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 471-474.
[14] 龙吟, 何晓东, 廖建国, 黄珏, 张磊. 高复发风险肝癌患者术后靶向免疫治疗的安全性及疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 379-386.
[15] 毛伟民, 蓝祝晶, 徐邦浩, 朱海, 王继龙, 金宗睿, 蒙柄成, 卢婷婷, 曾晶晶, 吕自力, 宋瑞, 文张. 肝肉瘤样癌14例临床诊疗分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 435-441.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?