Prevention and treatment of premature pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2019.03.002

Abstract

Abstract:

With the development and the utilization of assisted reproductive technology, its higher rate of complications than natural pregnancy arouse universal attention. Preterm birth is one of the most common and severe complications, which has potential and long-term influence on the offspring. Therefore, the prevention and treatment of preterm birth associated with assisted reproductive technology should be strengthened, as well as studies exploring the risk factors and effective interventions.

Key words: Reproductive techniques, assisted, Pregnancy, Preterm birth

Yaoyao Liu, Hongbo Qi. Prevention and treatment of premature pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(03): 133-136.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhckjjdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2019.03.002

https://zhckjjdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2019/V08/I03/133

References 36

[1]	Goisis A, Remes H, Martikainen P, et al. Medically assisted reproduction and birth outcomes: a within-family analysis using Finnish population registers [J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(10177): 1225-1232.
[2]	De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, et al. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)[J]. Hum Reprod, 2018, 33(9):1586-1601.
[3]	Ory SJ. The national epidemic of multiple pregnancy and the contribution of assisted reproductive technology[J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 100(4): 929-930.
[4]	Kulkarni AD, Jamieson DJ, Jones HW, Jr., et al. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(23): 2218-2225.
[5]	Wilson CL, Fisher JR, Hammarberg K, et al. Looking downstream: a review of the literature on physical and psychosocial health outcomes in adolescents and young adults who were conceived by ART[J]. Hum Reprod, 2011, 26(5): 1209-1219.
[6]	Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF, et al. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2017, 15(1): 6.
[7]	Martin AS, Chang J, Zhang Y, et al. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology [J]. Fertil Steril, 2017, 107(4): 954-960.
[8]	Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2012, 18(5): 485-503.
[9]	Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2013, 19(2): 87-104.
[10]	Sutcliffe AG, Ludwig M. Outcome of assisted reproduction [J]. Lancet (London, England), 2007, 370(9584): 351-359.
[11]	McDonald S, Murphy K, Beyene J, et al. Perinatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analyses [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 193(1): 141-152.
[12]	Kupka MS, Ferraretti AP, de Mouzon J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHREdagger[J]. Hum Reprod, 2014, 29(10): 2099-2113.
[13]	Li C, Zhao WH, Zhu Q, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a multi-center case-control study [J]. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015, 15: 187.
[14]	Pezeshki K, Feldman J, Stein DE, et al. Bleeding and spontaneous abortion after therapy for infertility [J]. Fertil Steril, 2000, 74(3): 504-508.
[15]	Schieve LA, Tatham L, Peterson HB, et al. Spontaneous abortion among pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technology in the United States [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 101(5 Pt 1): 959-967.
[16]	Vermey BG, Buchanan A, Chambers GM, et al. Are singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction technology (ART) associated with a higher risk of placental anomalies compared with non-ART singleton pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. BJOG, 2019, 126(2): 209-218.
[17]	Martin AS, Monsour M, Kissin DM, et al. Trends in Severe Maternal Morbidity After Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States, 2008-2012 [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 127(1): 59-66.
[18]	Yu HT, Yang Q, Sun XX, et al. Association of birth defects with the mode of assisted reproductive technology in a Chinese data-linkage cohort [J]. Fertil Steril, 2018, 109(5): 849-856.
[19]	Hwang SS, Dukhovny D, Gopal D, et al. Health of Infants After ART-Treated, Subfertile, and Fertile Deliveries [J]. Pediatrics, 2018, 142(2). pii: e20174069
[20]	Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 103(3): 551-563.
[21]	American College of O, Gynecologists′ Committee on Obstetric P, Committee on G, Food US, Drug A. Committee Opinion No 671: Perinatal Risks Associated With Assisted Reproductive Technology [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 128(3): e61-e68.
[22]	Seggers J, Pontesilli M, Ravelli ACJ, et al. Effects of in vitro fertilization and maternal characteristics on perinatal outcomes: a population-based study using siblings [J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 105(3): 590.e592-598.e592.
[23]	Barbuscia A, Mills MC. Cognitive development in children up to age 11 years born after ART-a longitudinal cohort study [J]. Hum Reprod, 2017, 32(7):1482-1488.
[24]	Goisis A, Schneider DC, Myrskyla M. Secular changes in the association between advanced maternal age and the risk of low birth weight: A cross-cohort comparison in the UK [J]. Popul Stud (Camb), 2018, 72(3): 381-397.
[25]	Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects--a systematic review [J]. Hum Reprod, 2005, 20(2): 328-338.
[26]	Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, Freiesleben N, et al. Vanishing twins: a predictor of small-for-gestational age in IVF singletons [J]. Hum Reprod, 2007, 22(10): 2707-2714.
[27]	Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, et al. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology [J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346(10): 731-737.
[28]	Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2006, 28(3): 220-233.
[29]	Iams JD, Romero R, Culhane JF, et al. Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth [J]. Lancet, 2008, 371(9607): 164-175.
[30]	Norman JE, Marlow N, Messow CM, et al. Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial [J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10033): 2106-2116.
[31]	Stock SJ, Ismail KM. Which intervention reduces the risk of preterm birth in women with risk factors？[J]. BMJ, 2016, 355:i5206.
[32]	National Collaborating Centre for Women′s and Children′s Health (UK). Preterm Labour and Birth. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK)[J]. NICE Guideline, No. 25, 2015.
[33]	Nicolaides KH, Syngelaki A, Poon LC, et al. A Randomized Trial of a Cervical Pessary to Prevent Preterm Singleton Birth [J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 374(11): 1044-1052.
[34]	Magee LA, De Silva DA, Sawchuck D, et al. No. 376-Magnesium Sulphate for Fetal Neuroprotection[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2019, 41(4): 505-522.
[35]	Practice Bulletin No. 159: Management of Preterm Labor [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 127(1): e29-e38.
[36]	Medley N, Poljak B, Mammarella S, et al. Clinical guidelines for prevention and management of preterm birth: a systematic review [J]. BJOG, 2018, 125(11): 1361-1369.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export