切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (01) : 36 -40. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2013.01.010

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

初探建立严重产后出血及严重并发症的预测评估系统
沈宇清1, 陈敦金2,()   
  1. 1. 510150 广州医学院第三附属医院妇产科(现在广东省开平市中心医院妇产科)
    2. 510150 广州医学院第三附属医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-03 出版日期:2013-02-18
  • 通信作者: 陈敦金

Establishment of a severe postpartum hemorrhage and the severe complication prediction scoring system

Yu-qing SHEN1, Dun-jin CHEN2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, China
  • Received:2012-09-03 Published:2013-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Dun-jin CHEN
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: CHEN Dun-jin, Email:
引用本文:

沈宇清, 陈敦金. 初探建立严重产后出血及严重并发症的预测评估系统[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2013, 02(01): 36-40.

Yu-qing SHEN, Dun-jin CHEN. Establishment of a severe postpartum hemorrhage and the severe complication prediction scoring system[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2013, 02(01): 36-40.

目的

探讨建立严重产后出血预测评估系统,以指导临床处理。

方法

采用回顾性研究方法,对广州医学院第三附属医院2000年1月至2008年6月收治的375例严重产后出血患者资料进行评分,分析所得分值与各器官功能障碍、并发症及预后的关系,建立产后出血预测评估系统。数据分析采用χ2检验、Fisher确切概率法、线性趋势检验和logistic回归分析。

结果

严重产后出血风险预测公式log eY/(1-Y)=-7.274+0.858×产前评分+0.821×产后评分,初步得出指导临床处理的分值:评分为4分患者2器官功能障碍发生率显著增加(χ2=13.23,P<0.01),评分12分患者3个以上器官功能障碍发生率明显升高(χ2=54.21,P<0.01)。评分为8分组母亲子宫切除率显著升高(χ2=20.65,P<0.01);严重产后出血在评分6分组与1~5分组(χ2=10.85,P<0.01)、8分组与6~7分组(χ2=4.68,P<0.05)、12分组与8~11分组(χ2=10.53,P<0.01),差异具有统计学意义。

结论

该评估系统可以有效预测严重产后出血的发生风险并评估产后出血患者的病情危重程度,进一步评价还需大样本量的研究。

Objective

To provide guideline for the clinical management of postpartum hemorrhage, and to build up a scoring system for the prediction of severe postartum hemorrhage.

Methods

This study reviewed 375 pregnant women with severe postpartum hemorrhage, who were treated on the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2000 to June 2008. Then we analyzed the relationship between scores and the maternal outcomes, which included organ dysfunction, hysterectomy and death, and established the prediction scoring system for postpartum hemorrhage. The data were analyzed using χ2 test, Fisher exact probability test, linear association and logistic regression.

Results

log eY / (1-Y) = -7.274 + 0.858 × prenatal score + 0.821 × postpartum score was the formula of prediction for sever postapartume hemorrhage. The score was 4 which suggested the incresing risk of organ dysfunction (χ2=13.23, P<0.01), and 12 scores suggested the incresing risk of three or more organs dysfunction (χ2=54.21, P<0.01). Over 8 scores suggested the risk of hysterectomy was increased significantly(χ2=20.65, P<0.01). There were significantly difference of serve postpartum hemorrhage between score 6 group and score 1-5 group(χ2=10.85, P<0.01). And sever postpartum hemorrhage also had significant difference between score 8 group and 6-7 group(χ2=4.68, P<0.05), score 12 group and score 8-11 group(χ2=10.53, P<0.01).

Conclusions

The prediction scoring system can be used to predict effectively the risk of severe postpartum hemorrhage and evaluate the serious degree of situation. In the further, we need a research on a large scale.

表1 产后出血评分系统
表2 不同评分组母亲器官功能障碍发生情况
表3 不同评分组母亲并发症发生情况(例数)
[1]
王玉华. 应用"产后出血预测评分表"预测评分减少产后出血. 中国妇幼保健,2005, 20(7):859-860.
[2]
Larsson A, Palm M, Hansson LO, et al. Reference values for clinical chemistry tests during normal pregnancy. BJOG, 2008, 115(7):874-881.
[3]
Magann, Everett F, Evans, et al. Postpartum Hemorrhage After Vaginal Delivery: An Analysis of Risk Factors. Southern Medical Association, 2005, 98(7):681-685.
[4]
Reyes OA, Gonzalez GM. Carbetocin versus oxytocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in patients with severe preeclampsia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2011, 33(11):1099-1104.
[5]
林元,颜建英,许金榜,等. 3486例产后出血危险因素回顾性分析. 中国妇幼保健,2007, 22(36):5114-5117.
[6]
Deneux-Tharaux C, Carmona E, Bouvier-Colle MH, et al. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 108(3 Pt 1):541-548.
[7]
Hadar A, Rabinovich A, Sheiner E, et al. Obstetric characteristics and neonatal outcome of unplanned out-of-hospital term deliveries: a prospective, case-control study. J Reprod Med, 2005, 50(11):832-836.
[8]
Biguzzi E, Franchi F, Ambrogi F, et al. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage in a cohort of 6011 Italian women. Thromb Res, 2012, 129(4):e1-e7.
[9]
Norwitz ER, Snegovskikh VV, Caughey AB. Prolonged pregnancy: when should we intervene?. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 50(2):547-557.
[10]
Walker MC, Murphy KE, Pan S, et al. Adverse maternal outcomes in multifetal pregnancies. BJOG, 2004, 111(11):1294-1296.
[11]
Christopher B-Lynch, Louis G.Keith, Andre B.Lalonde, et al. A Textbook of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Britain: Sapiens Publishing, 2006:301-320.
[12]
Fry DE. Multiple system organ failure.Surg Clin North Am, 1988, 68(1):107-122.
[13]
Zhang WH, Alexander S, Bouvier-Colle MH, et al. Incidence of severe pre-eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis as a surrogate marker for severe maternal morbidity in a European population-based study: the MOMS-B survey. BJOG, 2005, 112(1):89-96.
[1] 范帅华, 郭伟, 郭军. 基于机器学习的决策树算法在血流感染预后预测中应用现状及展望[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 289-293.
[2] 李圣鹏, 方爱蓝, 刘诗宁, 王丹, 刘湘奇. 下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度的预测因素与评估方法[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 441-445.
[3] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 王万川, 麦广智, 张晓槟, 冯家豪. 腹腔镜下LAR术治疗低位直肠癌保肛术中钉仓数量与术后LARS的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 491-496.
[6] 贾成朋, 王代宏, 陈华, 孙备. 可切除性胰腺癌预后术前预测模型的建立及应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 566-570.
[7] 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.
[8] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[9] 杨静, 顾红叶, 赵莹莹, 孙梦霞, 查园园, 王琪. 老年血液透析患者短期死亡的影响因素及列线图预测模型的预测作用[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 254-259.
[10] 秦维, 王丹, 孙玉, 霍玉玲, 祝素平, 郑艳丽, 薛瑞. 血清层粘连蛋白、Ⅳ型胶原蛋白对代偿期肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张出血的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 447-451.
[11] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[12] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[13] 孙旻. 血液淀粉酶、C反应蛋白、降钙素原及乳酸脱氢酶在急性胰腺炎患者病情评价及预后预测中的价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 331-336.
[14] 马强, 李军, 苟丽娟. 重症急性胰腺炎miR-21-3p、RUNX3表达水平及对病情发展程度的预测[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 337-341.
[15] 王亚丹, 吴静, 黄博洋, 王苗苗, 郭春梅, 宿慧, 王沧海, 王静, 丁鹏鹏, 刘红. 白光内镜下结直肠肿瘤性质预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 655-661.
阅读次数
全文


摘要