切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (01) : 36 -40. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2013.01.010

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

初探建立严重产后出血及严重并发症的预测评估系统
沈宇清1, 陈敦金2,()   
  1. 1. 510150 广州医学院第三附属医院妇产科(现在广东省开平市中心医院妇产科)
    2. 510150 广州医学院第三附属医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-03 出版日期:2013-02-18
  • 通信作者: 陈敦金

Establishment of a severe postpartum hemorrhage and the severe complication prediction scoring system

Yu-qing SHEN1, Dun-jin CHEN2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, China
  • Received:2012-09-03 Published:2013-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Dun-jin CHEN
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: CHEN Dun-jin, Email:
引用本文:

沈宇清, 陈敦金. 初探建立严重产后出血及严重并发症的预测评估系统[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2013, 02(01): 36-40.

Yu-qing SHEN, Dun-jin CHEN. Establishment of a severe postpartum hemorrhage and the severe complication prediction scoring system[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2013, 02(01): 36-40.

目的

探讨建立严重产后出血预测评估系统,以指导临床处理。

方法

采用回顾性研究方法,对广州医学院第三附属医院2000年1月至2008年6月收治的375例严重产后出血患者资料进行评分,分析所得分值与各器官功能障碍、并发症及预后的关系,建立产后出血预测评估系统。数据分析采用χ2检验、Fisher确切概率法、线性趋势检验和logistic回归分析。

结果

严重产后出血风险预测公式log eY/(1-Y)=-7.274+0.858×产前评分+0.821×产后评分,初步得出指导临床处理的分值:评分为4分患者2器官功能障碍发生率显著增加(χ2=13.23,P<0.01),评分12分患者3个以上器官功能障碍发生率明显升高(χ2=54.21,P<0.01)。评分为8分组母亲子宫切除率显著升高(χ2=20.65,P<0.01);严重产后出血在评分6分组与1~5分组(χ2=10.85,P<0.01)、8分组与6~7分组(χ2=4.68,P<0.05)、12分组与8~11分组(χ2=10.53,P<0.01),差异具有统计学意义。

结论

该评估系统可以有效预测严重产后出血的发生风险并评估产后出血患者的病情危重程度,进一步评价还需大样本量的研究。

Objective

To provide guideline for the clinical management of postpartum hemorrhage, and to build up a scoring system for the prediction of severe postartum hemorrhage.

Methods

This study reviewed 375 pregnant women with severe postpartum hemorrhage, who were treated on the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2000 to June 2008. Then we analyzed the relationship between scores and the maternal outcomes, which included organ dysfunction, hysterectomy and death, and established the prediction scoring system for postpartum hemorrhage. The data were analyzed using χ2 test, Fisher exact probability test, linear association and logistic regression.

Results

log eY / (1-Y) = -7.274 + 0.858 × prenatal score + 0.821 × postpartum score was the formula of prediction for sever postapartume hemorrhage. The score was 4 which suggested the incresing risk of organ dysfunction (χ2=13.23, P<0.01), and 12 scores suggested the incresing risk of three or more organs dysfunction (χ2=54.21, P<0.01). Over 8 scores suggested the risk of hysterectomy was increased significantly(χ2=20.65, P<0.01). There were significantly difference of serve postpartum hemorrhage between score 6 group and score 1-5 group(χ2=10.85, P<0.01). And sever postpartum hemorrhage also had significant difference between score 8 group and 6-7 group(χ2=4.68, P<0.05), score 12 group and score 8-11 group(χ2=10.53, P<0.01).

Conclusions

The prediction scoring system can be used to predict effectively the risk of severe postpartum hemorrhage and evaluate the serious degree of situation. In the further, we need a research on a large scale.

表1 产后出血评分系统
表2 不同评分组母亲器官功能障碍发生情况
表3 不同评分组母亲并发症发生情况(例数)
[1]
王玉华. 应用"产后出血预测评分表"预测评分减少产后出血. 中国妇幼保健,2005, 20(7):859-860.
[2]
Larsson A, Palm M, Hansson LO, et al. Reference values for clinical chemistry tests during normal pregnancy. BJOG, 2008, 115(7):874-881.
[3]
Magann, Everett F, Evans, et al. Postpartum Hemorrhage After Vaginal Delivery: An Analysis of Risk Factors. Southern Medical Association, 2005, 98(7):681-685.
[4]
Reyes OA, Gonzalez GM. Carbetocin versus oxytocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in patients with severe preeclampsia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2011, 33(11):1099-1104.
[5]
林元,颜建英,许金榜,等. 3486例产后出血危险因素回顾性分析. 中国妇幼保健,2007, 22(36):5114-5117.
[6]
Deneux-Tharaux C, Carmona E, Bouvier-Colle MH, et al. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 108(3 Pt 1):541-548.
[7]
Hadar A, Rabinovich A, Sheiner E, et al. Obstetric characteristics and neonatal outcome of unplanned out-of-hospital term deliveries: a prospective, case-control study. J Reprod Med, 2005, 50(11):832-836.
[8]
Biguzzi E, Franchi F, Ambrogi F, et al. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage in a cohort of 6011 Italian women. Thromb Res, 2012, 129(4):e1-e7.
[9]
Norwitz ER, Snegovskikh VV, Caughey AB. Prolonged pregnancy: when should we intervene?. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 50(2):547-557.
[10]
Walker MC, Murphy KE, Pan S, et al. Adverse maternal outcomes in multifetal pregnancies. BJOG, 2004, 111(11):1294-1296.
[11]
Christopher B-Lynch, Louis G.Keith, Andre B.Lalonde, et al. A Textbook of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Britain: Sapiens Publishing, 2006:301-320.
[12]
Fry DE. Multiple system organ failure.Surg Clin North Am, 1988, 68(1):107-122.
[13]
Zhang WH, Alexander S, Bouvier-Colle MH, et al. Incidence of severe pre-eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis as a surrogate marker for severe maternal morbidity in a European population-based study: the MOMS-B survey. BJOG, 2005, 112(1):89-96.
[1] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[2] 李国煜, 丛赟, 祖丽胡马尔·麦麦提艾力, 何铁英. 急性胰腺炎并发门静脉系统血栓形成的危险因素及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 266-270.
[3] 杨攀, 黄晓寒, 邓才霞, 周利航, 周向东, 罗虎. SMARCA4缺失的胸部未分化肿瘤临床特征及预后分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 529-534.
[4] 姜露, 周菊, 毛杨, 代黔. 单细胞和bulk RNA测序的综合分析预测肺鳞状细胞癌治疗反应和预后[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 535-542.
[5] 方晓玉, 王婷, 赵珊, 陈锋. HALP指数对AECOPD并发呼吸衰竭患者ICU结局的预测意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 639-641.
[6] 何慧玲, 鲁祖斌, 冯嘉莉, 梁声强. 术前外周血NLR和PLR对结肠癌术后肝转移的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 682-687.
[7] 周璐, 温镕博, 刘子璇, 李奕飏, 周乐其, 朱晓明, 龚海峰, 高显华, 楼征, 刘连杰, 郝立强, 于冠宇, 张卫. Changhai-AL-Prediction预测模型指导预防性造口合理实施的卫生经济学研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 280-287.
[8] 国超凡, 彭琪博, 郑章强, 于向阳. 低位前切除综合征风险预测及治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 335-340.
[9] 秦相清, 朱陈, 张海银. 构建诺模图模型预测肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张出血的风险[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 330-335.
[10] 刘伟, 高续, 谢玉海, 蒋哲, 刘士成. 基于增强CT影像组学模型在预测急性胰腺炎复发中的应用价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 348-354.
[11] 田娜, 韩飞天. 基于CT平扫影像组学模型与系统免疫炎症指数预测急性胰腺炎复发模型的建立[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 355-359.
[12] 赵倩, 刘文超, 李玺琳, 章邱东. 老年急性脑梗死诱发胃肠损伤的风险因素分析及模型构建[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 213-217.
[13] 董晟, 郎胜坤, 葛新, 孙少君, 薛明宇. 反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分对老年严重创伤患者发生急性创伤性凝血功能障碍的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-547.
[14] 黄圣楷, 许斌, 苏健, 孙龙. 海南省2010~2020年乙型肝炎流行趋势的时间序列分析及预测[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 555-561.
[15] 张绍森, 王基源, 张东. 颅内动静脉畸形破裂出血预测中的若干问题[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 197-201.
阅读次数
全文


摘要