切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (04) : 230 -233. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2015.04.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同产前检查情况与重度子痫前期及子痫的临床分析
成志1, 王子莲2,(), 罗小华1,(), 李付广1, 郭晓燕1, 覃碧芳1   
  1. 1. 511518 广东省清远市,广州医科大学附属第六医院 清远市人民医院妇产科
    2. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-21 出版日期:2015-11-18
  • 通信作者: 王子莲, 罗小华

Clinical analysis of relationship between different antenatal examination situations with severe preeclampsia and eclampsia

Zhi Cheng1, Zilian Wang2,(), Xiaohua Luo1,(), Fuguang Li1, Xiaoyan Guo1, Bifang Qin1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Six Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan 511518, China
    2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2015-08-21 Published:2015-11-18
  • Corresponding author: Zilian Wang, Xiaohua Luo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Zilian, Email: ;
    Luo Xiaohua, Email:
引用本文:

成志, 王子莲, 罗小华, 李付广, 郭晓燕, 覃碧芳. 不同产前检查情况与重度子痫前期及子痫的临床分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2015, 04(04): 230-233.

Zhi Cheng, Zilian Wang, Xiaohua Luo, Fuguang Li, Xiaoyan Guo, Bifang Qin. Clinical analysis of relationship between different antenatal examination situations with severe preeclampsia and eclampsia[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2015, 04(04): 230-233.

目的

分析不同产前检查情况与重度子痫前期及子痫患者的临床特点。

方法

回顾性分析在2012年10月至2015年4月清远市人民医院住院分娩的307例单胎妊娠重度子痫前期及子痫患者的临床资料,按照产前检查情况分为:从未检查组(36例)、不规则检查组(146例)、规律检查组(125例);其中规律产前检查组按检查医院级别分为:一甲医院检查组(17例)、二甲医院检查组(37例)、三甲医院检查组(71例)。比较各组患者的临床基本情况及妊娠结局。

结果

(1)母体严重并发症:从未检查组、不规律检查组和规律检查组严重并发症的发生率分别为33.3%、17.1%和8.8%,从未检查组与规律检查组比较,χ2=-0.292,P<0.017;入住ICU率依次为16.7%,4.6%和1.6%,从未检查组与不规律检查组比较,χ2=-0.202,从未检查组与规律检查组比较,χ2=-0.289,P均<0.017。(2)围产儿结局:围产儿不良结局包括胎儿窘迫、轻度窒息、胎儿生长受限、入住ICU、低血糖和死亡;规律检查组与从未检查组的比较,差异有统计学意义。(3)二甲医院检查组和三甲医院检查组极低出生体重儿发生率为16.2%和1.4%, χ2=-0.285,P<0.017;入住NICU率为40.5%和15.5%, χ2=-0.278,P<0.017。

结论

重度子痫前期及子痫患者接受规律的产前检查,即使在不同级别的医院产检,也可及早发现异常临床表现,并及时处理,改善妊娠结局。

Objective

To analyze clinical characteristics of the patients with severe preeclampsia and eclampsia under different antenatal examination situations.

Methods

From October 2012 to April 2015, 307 singleton pregnant patients with severe preeclampsia and eclampsia admitted to Qingyuan City People′s Hospitalwere were enrolled in this retrospective study. According to antenatal examination, patients were divided into 3 groups. Thirty-six cases were in never examination group, 146 cases were in irregular examination group, 125 cases were in regular examination group. According to examination hospital, regular antenatal examination patients were divided into 3 groups. Seventeen cases were in grape-one hospitals examination group, 37 cases were in grape-two hospitals examination group, 71 cases were in grape-three hospitals examination group. Clinical general information and pregnancy outcomes of different groups were compared.

Results

(1)Maternal complications: The incidences of maternal complications in never examination group, irregular examination group and regular examination group were 33.3%, 17.1% and 8.8%, respectively. There was significant difference between never examination group and regular examination group (χ2=-0.292, P<0.017). The incidences of ICU admission in the 3 groups were 16.7%, 4.6% and 1.6%, respectively. Compare with never examination, irregular examination group and regular examination group were significant difference (χ2=-0.202 and χ2=-0.289, P<0.017)(2)Perinatal fetus outcomes: The adverse outcomes of perinatal fetuses were fetal distress, mild asphexia, fetal growth restriction, NICU admission, hypoglycemia and neonatal death. There were significant differences between never examination group and regular examination group. (3) The incidences of very low birth weight infant in grape-two and grape-three hospitals were 16.2% and 1.4%, and there was significant difference (χ2=-0.285, P<0.017). The incidence of NICU admission in grape-two and grape-three hospitals were 40.5% and 15.5%, and there was also significant difference (χ2=-0.278, P<0.017).

Conclusion

Under regular antenatal examination, even severe preeclampsia and eclampsia patients in the different grapes hospitals can detect early clinical abnormalities and have timely treatment to improve the pregnancy outcomes.

表1 不同产检规律三组患者的一般情况比较
表2 3组患者的严重并发症分布情况
表3 3组患者的围产儿结局的比较
[1]
谢幸,苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:64-79.
[2]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组. 妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2015版)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2015, 10(50):721-728.
[3]
罗宇迪. 218例子痫前期临床预警与孕期保健质量的分析[J]. 广西医学,2012, 11(34):1515-1517.
[4]
宋颖,杨孜,沈洁,等. 规律产前检查子痫前期患者早期临床发病特点分析[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2014, 6(30):457-461.
[5]
段涛. 子痫前期-子痫相关问题近十年的回顾与展望[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2013, 4(48):268-271.
[6]
王伽略,杨孜,沈洁中. 母体潜在风险因素和不同产前检查与子痫前期发病特点[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2012, 3(15):147-152.
[7]
侯杉杉,周虹,王燕. 产前保健次数与不良妊娠结局的Meta分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究,2010, 21(1):16-20.
[8]
Ryan GM, Sweeney PJ, Solola AS. Prenatal care and pregnancy outcome[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1980, 137(8):876-881.
[9]
Wulfr KH, Steck T. The impact of timing and frequency of prenatal visits on the outcome of pregnancy in the perinatal registry of Bavaria 1987-1988[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1994, 57(2):79-84.
[10]
谢志莲,蔺飒,罗桂芝,等. 重度妊娠期高血压疾病54例临床分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究,2011, 22(5):678-684.
[1] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 范思涵, 叶彩玲, 纪学芹. 产前超声心动图在先天性血管环诊断中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 37-41.
[2] 梁越, 董晓秋, 李奇默, 李岩, 姚金来, 朴雪梅. 孕11~13+6周子宫动脉与左心室参数对子痫前期的预测模型构建与验证[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 42-48.
[3] 何雪威, 谷美玉, 吴亭亭. 超声子宫动脉及子宫内膜血流参数对不明原因复发性流产患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1158-1163.
[4] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[5] 薛静, 孙雅楠, 朱丽丽, 李淑红. 妊娠期急性脂肪肝孕产妇诊疗及其妊娠结局[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 312-321.
[6] 陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[7] 贾赛君, 张英, 万佳义. 妊娠合并亚临床甲状腺功能减退孕妇的妊娠结局[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[8] 李博, 马秀岩, 孙杰. lncRNA TINCR对滋养层HTR-8/SVneo细胞生物学行为的影响及其机制[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 167-172.
[9] 胡淼, 杜丽丽, 张丽姿, 林琳, 张瑜亮, 古士锋, 古仲嘉, 赖思莹, 梁景英, 刘雨, 黄敏珊, 黄媛媛, 黄晴晴, 罗世君, 陈敦金. 体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射受孕患者胎盘植入分级及围产结局的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 183-189.
[10] 刘文易, 高晓彤, 汤景, 麦卓瑶, 祝丽琼, 陈慧. 体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠合并绒毛膜下血肿患者妊娠结局的临床研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 93-99.
[11] 庄旭, 丁立, 许丽, 张宁, 张羽, 林建华. 慢性肾病孕妇肾脏超声异常与不良妊娠结局的相关性研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 100-105.
[12] 徐琦, 彭小芳, 杜涛, 王霞妹, 张蜀宁, 陈曼绮, 郭勤敏, 黄泽薇, 付帅. COL1A2基因变异致胎儿期及成年后成骨不全家系的相关研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 106-111.
[13] 王晓艳, 朱利平, 侯顺玉, 岳永飞. 椎管内分娩镇痛对B族溶血性链球菌阳性孕妇阴道分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 112-116.
[14] 张舒沁, 赵扬玉. 体外受精-胚胎移植与妊娠期高血压疾病[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 79-83.
[15] 李剑琦. 血清无细胞RNA铁死亡相关基因预测早发型子痫前期的初步研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 49-54.
阅读次数
全文


摘要