切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 54 -58. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2020.01.012

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

论著

孕期非产科手术87例围手术期管理及妊娠结局分析
吴亚芬1, 庹鹏1, 刘近发1, 王寿平1,()   
  1. 1. 510150 广州医科大学附属第三医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-01 出版日期:2020-02-18
  • 通信作者: 王寿平

Perioperative management and pregnancy outcome analysis for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy: 87 case series

Yafen Wu1, Peng Tuo1, Jinfa Liu1, Shouping Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510150, China
  • Received:2019-07-01 Published:2020-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Shouping Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Shouping, Email:
引用本文:

吴亚芬, 庹鹏, 刘近发, 王寿平. 孕期非产科手术87例围手术期管理及妊娠结局分析[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2020, 09(01): 54-58.

Yafen Wu, Peng Tuo, Jinfa Liu, Shouping Wang. Perioperative management and pregnancy outcome analysis for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy: 87 case series[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(01): 54-58.

目的

探讨孕妇在孕期行非产科手术时麻醉方式、手术因素及患者是否存在感染对母胎的影响。

方法

回顾性分析广州医科大学附属第三医院2015年1月至2018年8月收治的87例因非产科疾病行手术治疗孕妇的临床资料,分析患者疾病分类、最终分娩孕周、分娩方式、早产及流产率等妊娠结局,比较不同孕期、不同手术方式、麻醉方式及感染并发症对妊娠结局的影响。

结果

87例患者疾病分类:急性阑尾炎35例(40.2%),宫内妊娠合并宫外孕7例(8.1%),卵巢囊肿蒂扭转9例(10.3%),卵巢肿物21例(24.1%),泌尿系结石13例(14.9%),胆囊结石2例(2.3%);不同孕期接受非产科手术孕妇妊娠结局比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);不同手术方式孕妇的分娩孕周、分娩方式、流产率、早产率等方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);椎管内麻醉及全身麻醉在分娩方式、分娩孕周、早产及流产等方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。孕妇合并感染对妊娠结局有影响,孕妇合并感染情况对妊娠结局有影响,感染组分娩孕周低于对照组[(34.7±0.7)周与(38.5±0.2)周,Z=5.088,P<0.05]。感染组剖宫产率、早产率和流产率均高于对照组[41.7% (10/24)与31.7% (20/63), χ2=7.585;50% (12/24)与7.9% (5/63), χ2=19.588;50.0% (12/24)与0, χ2=29.659;P值均<0.05]。

结论

孕期行非产科手术仍然可以获得较满意的妊娠结局,对于病情稳定的患者,不同孕期进行手术、不同麻醉方式和不同手术方式对妊娠结局影响没有差别,但对于合并感染的患者,病情本身的进展可能会影响妊娠结局。

Objective

To investigate anesthesia methods, operation factors and infection factors effect on maternal and fetal outcome during non-obstetric surgery.

Methods

The clinical data of 87 pregnant women who needed surgical treatments for non-obstetric diseases from January 2015 to August 2018 in The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. We documented their pregnancy outcome indexes such as gestational week, mode of delivery and premature birth rate. Then, the effects of different pregnancies, surgical methods, anesthetic methods and complications of infection on pregnant women′s were compared.

Results

There are 35 cases of acute appendicitis (40.2%), 7 cases of uterine pregnancy complicated with ectopic pregnancy (8.1%), 9 cases of ovarian cyst pedicle torsion (10.3%), 21 cases of ovarian mass (24.1%), 13 cases of Urinary calculi (14.9%) and 2 cases of cholecystolithiasis (2.3%). There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcome among pregnant women undergoing non-obstetric surgery during different pregnancies (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in mode of delivery, gestational age, abortion rate and premature delivery rate between laparoscopy group and abdomen group (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in mode of delivery, gestational age, premature delivery rate and abortion rate between intravertebral anesthesia group and general anesthesia group (P>0.05). The pregnant women with infection had an effect on the pregnancy outcome. The gestational age of the infected group was lower than that of the control group [(34.7±0.7) weeks vs (38.5±0.2) weeks, Z=5.088, P<0.05]. The incident rate of cesarean section, premature delivery and abortion in the infection group were all higher than those in the control group [41.7% (10/24) vs 31.7% (20/63), χ2=7.585; 50% (12/24) vs 7.9% (5/63), χ2=19.588; 50.0% (12/24) vs 0, χ2=29.659; all P<0.05].

Conclusions

Non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy still can achieve satisfactory pregnancy outcome in the stable patients, while different kind of anesthesia and operation in different gestation will not affect the safety of the puerperant and fetus, but the progress of the disease itself may affect the pregnancy outcome for the co-infection patient.

表1 87例孕妇孕期合并非产科疾病分类、疾病情况及妊娠结局
表2 87例孕妇不同孕期进行手术妊娠结局的比较
表3 87例孕妇非产科手术不同手术方式妊娠结局的比较
表4 87例孕妇非产科手术不同麻醉方式妊娠结局的比较
表5 感染并发症对妊娠结局的影响
[13]
Kuczkowski, KM, The safety of anaesthetics in pregnant women[J]. Expert Opin Drug Saf, 2006, 5(2): 251-264.
[14]
Bonnet MP. Sedation and anaesthesia for non-obstetric surgery [J]. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 2016, 35(1): 35-41.
[15]
Shetti AN, Dhulkhed VK, Gujarati A, et al. Anesthetic management of a pregnant patient with pseudo-pancreatic cyst for cysto-gastrostomy [J]. Anesth Essays Res,2014,8(1): 89-92.
[1]
Reitman E, Flood P. Anaesthetic considerations for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2011, 107(1): 72-78.
[2]
Upadya M, Saneesh PJ. Saneesh, Anaesthesia for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy [J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2016, 60(4): 234-241.
[3]
Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine[J]. Chest, 1992, 101(6): 1644-1655.
[4]
Cox TC, Huntington CR, Blair LJ, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy versus open: a study in 1999 pregnant patients [J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(2): 593-602.
[5]
Laustsen JF, Bjerring OS, Johannessen Ø,et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy is safe for both the mother and the fetus[J]. Dan Med J, 2016, 63: A5259.
[6]
Pearl J, Price R, Richardson W, et al.Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy [J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(11): 3479-3492.
[7]
Baldwin EA, Borowski KS, Brost BC,et al. Antepartum nonobstetrical surgery at ≥23 weeks′ gestation and risk for preterm delivery[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 212(2): 232-235.
[8]
Cohen-Kerem R, Railton C, Oren D,et al. Pregnancy outcome following non-obstetric surgical intervention [J]. Am J Surg,2005,190(3): 467-473.
[9]
Ravindra GL, Madamangalam AS, Seetharamaiah S. Anaesthesia for non-obstetric surgery in obstetric patients [J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2018, 62(9):710-716.
[10]
曲元,黄宇光. 妇产科麻醉[M]. 2版. 北京:北京大学医学出版社,2018: 163-167.
[11]
Theilen LH, Mellnick VM, Shanks AL,et al.Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy: Predictive Clinical Factors and Pregnancy Outcomes[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2017, 34(6): 523-528.
[12]
Abbasi N, Patenaude V, Abenhaim HA. Evaluation of obstetrical and fetal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by acute appendicitis[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2014,290(4):661-667.
[1] 李钱梅, 何冠南, 赵婧, 陈曦, 唐玉英, 马丽琼, 梁蓉, 袁桃, 李明星. 早孕期低危妊娠和高危妊娠胎盘微血流成像特征及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 726-732.
[2] 刘涵, 刘晓菲, 陈翰翰, 陈延君, 张雁. 妊娠期肉芽肿性乳腺炎一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 253-254.
[3] 张舒沁, 陈练. 产后宫腔内妊娠物残留的诊断和临床处理[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 493-497.
[4] 刘子洋, 崔俭俭, 赵茵. 产科弥散性血管内凝血及其评分系统的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 511-518.
[5] 谢江燕, 王亚菲, 贺芳. 妊娠合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[6] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[7] 张静, 刘畅, 华成舸. 妊娠期患者口腔诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 340-344.
[8] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[9] 杨勇军, 曾一鸣, 贺显雅, 卢强, 李远伟. ASA分级≥Ⅲ级患者局麻经会阴前列腺多模态影像融合穿刺的安全性和有效性[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-447.
[10] 何岩, 向文采. 七氟醚与异丙酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在疝修补术中的镇静镇痛效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[11] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[12] 徐敬云, 丁波, 蒋宇慧, 沈杨. 妊娠期单孔腹腔镜手术实施行与思[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 262-266.
[13] 胡小靖, 张华. 妊娠期卵巢囊肿蒂扭转的诊断与治疗[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 197-201.
[14] 黎璞, 生秀杰. 妊娠合并子宫颈癌的管理[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 202-208.
[15] 俞慧慧, 尹宗智. 妊娠期胃穿孔[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 209-213.
阅读次数
全文


摘要