切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 101 -105. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2020.02.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

高龄孕妇合并妊娠期高血压疾病妊娠结局的临床分析
聂晓露1, 付帅1, 刘玉昆1, 张建平1, 陈慧1,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-30 出版日期:2020-05-18
  • 通信作者: 陈慧
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金自由申请项目(2014A030313079); 中山大学5010项目(2012006); 广东省科技厅公益研究与能力建设专项资金(2017A020214018)

Clinical analysis the pregnant outcomes of women of advanced age with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy

Xiaolu Nie1, Shuai Fu1, Yukun Liu1, Jianping Zhang1, Hui Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2020-03-30 Published:2020-05-18
  • Corresponding author: Hui Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Hui, Email:
引用本文:

聂晓露, 付帅, 刘玉昆, 张建平, 陈慧. 高龄孕妇合并妊娠期高血压疾病妊娠结局的临床分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2020, 09(02): 101-105.

Xiaolu Nie, Shuai Fu, Yukun Liu, Jianping Zhang, Hui Chen. Clinical analysis the pregnant outcomes of women of advanced age with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(02): 101-105.

目的

分析高龄孕妇合并妊娠期高血压疾病的临床特征,为改善其妊娠结局提供临床依据。

方法

采用回顾性研究方法,收集和分析2018年1月至2018年12月在中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院住院分娩妊娠期高血压疾病71例患者的临床资料,其中年龄≥35周岁24例(高龄组),年龄<35周岁47例(对照组),比较两组患者发病孕周、入院孕周、分娩孕周、妊娠合并症或并发症、分娩孕周、新生儿出生体重、新生儿窒息、新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征发生情况;正态分布资料使用t检验,非正态分布资料,使用Mann-Whitney U法进行统计分析,计数资料采用χ2检验。

结果

高龄组与对照组相比较,尿素(5.49±2.44)mmol/L vs (4.40±1.46)mmol/L, t=-2.342)、入院孕周(34.86周vs 37.14周,t=-2.095)、分娩孕周(36.07周vs 37.43周,t=-2.564)、剖宫产率(70.83% vs 42.55%, χ2=5.092)、顺产率(8.33% vs 46.81%, χ2=10.510)、引产率(16.67% vs 2.13%, χ2=5.130),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组新生儿体重(2 680 g vs 2 960 g, Z=-1.876)、新生儿窒息率(8.33% vs 8.51%, χ2=0.001)、新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征率(4.17% vs 14.89%, χ2=0.913),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

高龄患者合并妊娠期高血压疾病,与35岁以下孕妇发生妊娠期高血压疾病相比,临床特征为发病更早、肾脏功能损害更严重,终止妊娠孕周较早,早产率、剖宫产率升高,顺产率降低。对于高龄孕妇,应在妊娠过程中给予比普通孕妇更严密的母胎监测。

Objective

To analyze the clinical characteristics of pregnant women of advanced age with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy, and to provide the clinical basis for improving the pregnancy outcome.

Methods

A retrospective study was used to collect and analyze the clinical data of 71 cases of hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy during delivery in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2018 to December 2018. They were divided into two groups according to the age; 24 cases with age ≥35 years old were in the advanced maternal age group and 47 cases with age <35 years old were in the control group. Compare gestational weeks of onset, gestational weeks of admission, gestational weeks of delivery, complications of pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, neonatal weight, the rate of neonatal asphyxia and infant respiratory distress syndrome between the two groups. Student t-test was preformed to normal distributive data and Mann-Whitney U test was used to non-normally distributed variables. Chi-square test was used in count data.

Results

There were significant differences in urea nitrogen (5.49±2.44 mmol/L vs 4.40±1.46 mmol/L, t=-2.342), gestational age at admission (34.86 vs 37.14, t=-2.095), gestational age at delivery(36.07 vs 37.43, t=-2.564), the rate of Cesarean (70.83% vs 42.55%, χ2=5.0920), vaginal delivery (8.33% vs 46.81%, χ2=10.510) and induction of labor (16.67% vs 2.13%, χ2=5.130) between the advanced maternal age group and the control group were statistically significant (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the neonatal weight (2680 g vs 2960 g, Z=-1.876), the rate of neonatal asphyxia (8.33% vs 8.51%, χ2=0.001) and infant respiratory distress syndrome (4.17% vs 14.89%, χ2=0.913) among two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The clinical features of women of advanced age with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy were earlier onset, more serious renal function damage, earlier pregnancy termination, higher rate of premature delivery and Cesarean, lower rate of vaginal delivery. More closely monitoring should be given to the women of advanced age.

表1 两组孕妇一般情况比较[例(%)]
表2 两组患者本次妊娠并发症、合并症比较[例(%)]
表3 两组患者尿蛋白、血肌酐、尿素检验比较(±s)
表4 两组患者发病孕周、分娩孕周、妊娠结局的比较[例数(%)]
表5 两组患者新生儿出生体重和并发症的比较[例数(%)]
[1]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组,妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2015)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2015, 50(10): 721-728.
[2]
申叶,杨孜,陈扬,等. 轻中度妊娠期高血压孕妇的孕期血压控制和维持水平对母儿结局的影响[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2017, 52(9): 586-593.
[3]
谢幸,孔北华,段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 9版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018: 83-90.
[4]
杨怡珂,漆洪波. 美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)"妊娠期高血压和子痫前期指南2019版"要点解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2019, 35(8): 895-899.
[5]
段涛,李婷. 威廉姆斯产科手册[M]. 23版. 北京:科学出版社,2018: 130-136.
[6]
Priscila E Parra-Pingel, Luis A Quisigui?a-Avellán, Luis Hidalgo, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in younger and older adolescent mothers with severe preeclampsia[J]. Adolesc Health Med Ther, 2017, 8: 81-86.
[7]
Campbell SK, Lynch J, Esterman A, et al. Pre-pregnancy predictors of hypertension in pregnancy among aboriginal and torres strait islander women in north queensland,Australia, a prospective cohort study[J]. BMC Public Health, 2013, 13: 138.
[8]
Nanjundan P, Bagga R, Kalra JK, et al. Risk factors for early onset severe preeclampsia and eclampsia among north Indian women[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2011, 31(5): 384-389.
[9]
顾玮,周晔,周雷平,等. 子宫动脉血流指数在妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症的预测价值[J]. 同济大学学报:医学版,2015, 36(3): 48-53.
[10]
Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N, et al. Maternal Age and Preeclampsia Outcomes during Delivery Hospitalizations[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2020, 37(1): 44-52.
[11]
蒋红清,陈寒,宋慧颖,等. 妊娠期高血压疾病发病危险预测模型的建立分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报,2018, 39(10): 844-849.
[12]
邢倩,张七一,苏厚横,等. 抗心磷脂抗体与系统性红斑狼疮高血压的相关性[J]. 中华高血压杂志,2008, 16(3): 267-268.
[13]
陈自力,杨莉莉. 重度子痫前期患者血清尿素、肌酐、尿酸水平变化[J]. 山东医药,2017, 57(19): 66-68.
[14]
李素珊,吴小敏. 高龄产妇并发妊娠期高血压疾病对围产期结局的影响[J]. 临床医学工程,2017, 24(2): 207-208.
[15]
李盈. 高龄产妇并发妊娠期高血压对母婴结局的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床,2019, 19(2): 263-265.
[16]
李燕,周辉,何伟,等. 子宫颈扩张球囊联合缩宫素在足月妊娠期高血压和轻度子痫前期患者引产的临床效果研究[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2018, 34(10): 792-795.
[17]
唐雪,栋唐萍. 地诺前列酮栓在足月妊娠合并妊娠期高血压疾病孕妇终止妊娠中的应用[J]. 中华全科医师杂志,2014, 13(10): 817-819.
[18]
Mbachu II, Udigwe GO, Okafor CI, et al. The pattern and obstetric outcome of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Nnewi, Nigeria[J]. Niger J Med, 2013, 22(2): 117-122.
[19]
刘卫华. 高龄并妊娠期高血压对围产期结局的影响研究[J]. 吉林医学,2015, 36(6): 1065-1066.
[20]
Maoz-Halevy E, Pariente G, Sheiner E, et al. Perinatal Outcomes of Women Aged 50 Years and Above[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2020, 37(1): 79-85.
[21]
NICE guideline: Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management, 2019, 6.
[22]
Morgan JA, McCalmont LE, Towers CV, et al.Clinical Utility of Weekly Laboratory Testing in the Outpatient Management of Preeclampsia and Gestational hypertension [J]. AJP Rep, 2020, 10(1): e62-e67.
[1] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[7] 左解鹏, 周典晟, 王健, 刘文博, 吴长利, 田大伟. 局麻下利用软性膀胱镜联合铥激光治疗麻醉高风险膀胱肿瘤患者的经验[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 563-569.
[8] 王艳丽. 快速康复护理在高龄腹股沟疝Lichtenstein手术围手术期的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 350-353.
[9] 朱任飞, 冯秋琪, 肖锋, 陈志, 杨帆. Clavien-Dindo分级和并发症综合指数在高龄肝癌肝切除术安全性评估中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 312-316.
[10] 潘春江, 李科, 李新楼, 杨博, 任雪玲. 高龄老人骨转换代谢标志物与肾功能的相关性研究[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 260-264.
[11] 于天宇, 杨悦, 陆海涛, 田志永, 李文歌. 高龄急性肾损伤患者连续性肾脏替代治疗的预后及影响因素[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 134-138.
[12] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[13] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[14] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[15] 张丽姿, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的不良结局及远期影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
阅读次数
全文


摘要