切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 101 -105. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2020.02.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

高龄孕妇合并妊娠期高血压疾病妊娠结局的临床分析
聂晓露1, 付帅1, 刘玉昆1, 张建平1, 陈慧1,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-30 出版日期:2020-05-18
  • 通信作者: 陈慧
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金自由申请项目(2014A030313079); 中山大学5010项目(2012006); 广东省科技厅公益研究与能力建设专项资金(2017A020214018)

Clinical analysis the pregnant outcomes of women of advanced age with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy

Xiaolu Nie1, Shuai Fu1, Yukun Liu1, Jianping Zhang1, Hui Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2020-03-30 Published:2020-05-18
  • Corresponding author: Hui Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Hui, Email:
引用本文:

聂晓露, 付帅, 刘玉昆, 张建平, 陈慧. 高龄孕妇合并妊娠期高血压疾病妊娠结局的临床分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2020, 09(02): 101-105.

Xiaolu Nie, Shuai Fu, Yukun Liu, Jianping Zhang, Hui Chen. Clinical analysis the pregnant outcomes of women of advanced age with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(02): 101-105.

目的

分析高龄孕妇合并妊娠期高血压疾病的临床特征,为改善其妊娠结局提供临床依据。

方法

采用回顾性研究方法,收集和分析2018年1月至2018年12月在中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院住院分娩妊娠期高血压疾病71例患者的临床资料,其中年龄≥35周岁24例(高龄组),年龄<35周岁47例(对照组),比较两组患者发病孕周、入院孕周、分娩孕周、妊娠合并症或并发症、分娩孕周、新生儿出生体重、新生儿窒息、新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征发生情况;正态分布资料使用t检验,非正态分布资料,使用Mann-Whitney U法进行统计分析,计数资料采用χ2检验。

结果

高龄组与对照组相比较,尿素(5.49±2.44)mmol/L vs (4.40±1.46)mmol/L, t=-2.342)、入院孕周(34.86周vs 37.14周,t=-2.095)、分娩孕周(36.07周vs 37.43周,t=-2.564)、剖宫产率(70.83% vs 42.55%, χ2=5.092)、顺产率(8.33% vs 46.81%, χ2=10.510)、引产率(16.67% vs 2.13%, χ2=5.130),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组新生儿体重(2 680 g vs 2 960 g, Z=-1.876)、新生儿窒息率(8.33% vs 8.51%, χ2=0.001)、新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征率(4.17% vs 14.89%, χ2=0.913),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

高龄患者合并妊娠期高血压疾病,与35岁以下孕妇发生妊娠期高血压疾病相比,临床特征为发病更早、肾脏功能损害更严重,终止妊娠孕周较早,早产率、剖宫产率升高,顺产率降低。对于高龄孕妇,应在妊娠过程中给予比普通孕妇更严密的母胎监测。

Objective

To analyze the clinical characteristics of pregnant women of advanced age with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy, and to provide the clinical basis for improving the pregnancy outcome.

Methods

A retrospective study was used to collect and analyze the clinical data of 71 cases of hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy during delivery in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2018 to December 2018. They were divided into two groups according to the age; 24 cases with age ≥35 years old were in the advanced maternal age group and 47 cases with age <35 years old were in the control group. Compare gestational weeks of onset, gestational weeks of admission, gestational weeks of delivery, complications of pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, neonatal weight, the rate of neonatal asphyxia and infant respiratory distress syndrome between the two groups. Student t-test was preformed to normal distributive data and Mann-Whitney U test was used to non-normally distributed variables. Chi-square test was used in count data.

Results

There were significant differences in urea nitrogen (5.49±2.44 mmol/L vs 4.40±1.46 mmol/L, t=-2.342), gestational age at admission (34.86 vs 37.14, t=-2.095), gestational age at delivery(36.07 vs 37.43, t=-2.564), the rate of Cesarean (70.83% vs 42.55%, χ2=5.0920), vaginal delivery (8.33% vs 46.81%, χ2=10.510) and induction of labor (16.67% vs 2.13%, χ2=5.130) between the advanced maternal age group and the control group were statistically significant (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the neonatal weight (2680 g vs 2960 g, Z=-1.876), the rate of neonatal asphyxia (8.33% vs 8.51%, χ2=0.001) and infant respiratory distress syndrome (4.17% vs 14.89%, χ2=0.913) among two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The clinical features of women of advanced age with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy were earlier onset, more serious renal function damage, earlier pregnancy termination, higher rate of premature delivery and Cesarean, lower rate of vaginal delivery. More closely monitoring should be given to the women of advanced age.

表1 两组孕妇一般情况比较[例(%)]
表2 两组患者本次妊娠并发症、合并症比较[例(%)]
表3 两组患者尿蛋白、血肌酐、尿素检验比较(±s)
表4 两组患者发病孕周、分娩孕周、妊娠结局的比较[例数(%)]
表5 两组患者新生儿出生体重和并发症的比较[例数(%)]
[1]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组,妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2015)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2015, 50(10): 721-728.
[2]
申叶,杨孜,陈扬,等. 轻中度妊娠期高血压孕妇的孕期血压控制和维持水平对母儿结局的影响[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2017, 52(9): 586-593.
[3]
谢幸,孔北华,段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 9版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018: 83-90.
[4]
杨怡珂,漆洪波. 美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)"妊娠期高血压和子痫前期指南2019版"要点解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2019, 35(8): 895-899.
[5]
段涛,李婷. 威廉姆斯产科手册[M]. 23版. 北京:科学出版社,2018: 130-136.
[6]
Priscila E Parra-Pingel, Luis A Quisigui?a-Avellán, Luis Hidalgo, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in younger and older adolescent mothers with severe preeclampsia[J]. Adolesc Health Med Ther, 2017, 8: 81-86.
[7]
Campbell SK, Lynch J, Esterman A, et al. Pre-pregnancy predictors of hypertension in pregnancy among aboriginal and torres strait islander women in north queensland,Australia, a prospective cohort study[J]. BMC Public Health, 2013, 13: 138.
[8]
Nanjundan P, Bagga R, Kalra JK, et al. Risk factors for early onset severe preeclampsia and eclampsia among north Indian women[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2011, 31(5): 384-389.
[9]
顾玮,周晔,周雷平,等. 子宫动脉血流指数在妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症的预测价值[J]. 同济大学学报:医学版,2015, 36(3): 48-53.
[10]
Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N, et al. Maternal Age and Preeclampsia Outcomes during Delivery Hospitalizations[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2020, 37(1): 44-52.
[11]
蒋红清,陈寒,宋慧颖,等. 妊娠期高血压疾病发病危险预测模型的建立分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报,2018, 39(10): 844-849.
[12]
邢倩,张七一,苏厚横,等. 抗心磷脂抗体与系统性红斑狼疮高血压的相关性[J]. 中华高血压杂志,2008, 16(3): 267-268.
[13]
陈自力,杨莉莉. 重度子痫前期患者血清尿素、肌酐、尿酸水平变化[J]. 山东医药,2017, 57(19): 66-68.
[14]
李素珊,吴小敏. 高龄产妇并发妊娠期高血压疾病对围产期结局的影响[J]. 临床医学工程,2017, 24(2): 207-208.
[15]
李盈. 高龄产妇并发妊娠期高血压对母婴结局的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床,2019, 19(2): 263-265.
[16]
李燕,周辉,何伟,等. 子宫颈扩张球囊联合缩宫素在足月妊娠期高血压和轻度子痫前期患者引产的临床效果研究[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2018, 34(10): 792-795.
[17]
唐雪,栋唐萍. 地诺前列酮栓在足月妊娠合并妊娠期高血压疾病孕妇终止妊娠中的应用[J]. 中华全科医师杂志,2014, 13(10): 817-819.
[18]
Mbachu II, Udigwe GO, Okafor CI, et al. The pattern and obstetric outcome of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Nnewi, Nigeria[J]. Niger J Med, 2013, 22(2): 117-122.
[19]
刘卫华. 高龄并妊娠期高血压对围产期结局的影响研究[J]. 吉林医学,2015, 36(6): 1065-1066.
[20]
Maoz-Halevy E, Pariente G, Sheiner E, et al. Perinatal Outcomes of Women Aged 50 Years and Above[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2020, 37(1): 79-85.
[21]
NICE guideline: Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management, 2019, 6.
[22]
Morgan JA, McCalmont LE, Towers CV, et al.Clinical Utility of Weekly Laboratory Testing in the Outpatient Management of Preeclampsia and Gestational hypertension [J]. AJP Rep, 2020, 10(1): e62-e67.
[1] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 范思涵, 叶彩玲, 纪学芹. 产前超声心动图在先天性血管环诊断中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 37-41.
[2] 何雪威, 谷美玉, 吴亭亭. 超声子宫动脉及子宫内膜血流参数对不明原因复发性流产患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1158-1163.
[3] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[4] 薛静, 孙雅楠, 朱丽丽, 李淑红. 妊娠期急性脂肪肝孕产妇诊疗及其妊娠结局[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 312-321.
[5] 陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[6] 贾赛君, 张英, 万佳义. 妊娠合并亚临床甲状腺功能减退孕妇的妊娠结局[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[7] 李想, 郭征, 田洪哲, 李杜, 熊梦瑶, 潘铁军. 1 470 nm半导体激光减容性切除治疗高危前列腺增生的临床研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 448-452.
[8] 钱承博, 殷虎明, 邱峰, 侯建全, 黄玉华, 魏雪栋. 高龄患者行腹腔镜膀胱根治W形回肠新膀胱术的临床价值与风险评估[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 346-352.
[9] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[10] 胡淼, 杜丽丽, 张丽姿, 林琳, 张瑜亮, 古士锋, 古仲嘉, 赖思莹, 梁景英, 刘雨, 黄敏珊, 黄媛媛, 黄晴晴, 罗世君, 陈敦金. 体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射受孕患者胎盘植入分级及围产结局的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 183-189.
[11] 刘文易, 高晓彤, 汤景, 麦卓瑶, 祝丽琼, 陈慧. 体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠合并绒毛膜下血肿患者妊娠结局的临床研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 93-99.
[12] 庄旭, 丁立, 许丽, 张宁, 张羽, 林建华. 慢性肾病孕妇肾脏超声异常与不良妊娠结局的相关性研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 100-105.
[13] 徐琦, 彭小芳, 杜涛, 王霞妹, 张蜀宁, 陈曼绮, 郭勤敏, 黄泽薇, 付帅. COL1A2基因变异致胎儿期及成年后成骨不全家系的相关研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 106-111.
[14] 王晓艳, 朱利平, 侯顺玉, 岳永飞. 椎管内分娩镇痛对B族溶血性链球菌阳性孕妇阴道分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 112-116.
[15] 马建惠, 韩琦, 李韶玲. 加速康复外科护理路径+量化评估对腹腔镜胆囊切除术高龄患者手术室护理满意度的影响[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 53-56.
阅读次数
全文


摘要