切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 179 -183. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2021.03.012

论著

椎管内分娩镇痛对瘢痕子宫阴道分娩的影响
吴晓1, 岳永飞1, 黎婷1, 汪云1, 曲云1,()   
  1. 1. 215002 苏州,南京医科大学附属苏州医院 苏州市立医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-24 出版日期:2021-08-18
  • 通信作者: 曲云
  • 基金资助:
    苏州市2020年度科技发展计划(SYSD2020133); 苏州市2017年度第十九批产业技术创新专项(民生科技)项目(SS201710)

The impact of intraspinal analgesia on trial of labor after cesarean section

Xiao Wu1, Yongfei Yue1, Ting Li1, Yun Wang1, Yun Qu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou 215002, China
  • Received:2020-12-24 Published:2021-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Yun Qu
引用本文:

吴晓, 岳永飞, 黎婷, 汪云, 曲云. 椎管内分娩镇痛对瘢痕子宫阴道分娩的影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2021, 10(03): 179-183.

Xiao Wu, Yongfei Yue, Ting Li, Yun Wang, Yun Qu. The impact of intraspinal analgesia on trial of labor after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(03): 179-183.

目的

探讨实施椎管内分娩镇痛对瘢痕子宫阴道分娩产程以及母儿结局的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年6月在我院定期产检并住院分娩的221例瘢痕子宫患者的临床资料,其中行椎管内分娩镇痛110例,未行椎管内分娩镇痛111例。统计研究对象的一般情况,比较椎管内分娩镇痛对瘢痕子宫阴道分娩的产程及母儿结局影响。

结果

两组研究对象的年龄、体重指数、孕周、产时出血量、新生儿体重和分娩前住院时间均无统计学差异(P>0.05);镇痛组第一产程时间[(379.35±145.85)min]明显大于无镇痛组[(334.61±150.65)min](P=0.012),第二产程时间镇痛组[(63.57±26.20)min]明显大于无镇痛组[(54.61±27.32)min](P=0.002);人工破膜率镇痛组[27例(24.55%)]高于无镇痛组[14例(12.61%)](P=0.023);缩宫素催产率镇痛组[33例(30.00%)]高于无镇痛组[20例(18.02%)](P=0.037);中转剖宫产率无镇痛组[14例(12.61%)]高于镇痛组[5例(4.55%)],差异具有统计学意义(P=0.032);产时发热率镇痛组[18例(16.36%)]明显高于无镇痛组[7例(6.31%)],差异具有统计学意义(P=0.018);两组间的1和5 min Apgar评分、新生儿窒息率、会阴Ⅱ度裂伤、产后出血和产妇产后腰痛率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

瘢痕子宫阴道分娩孕妇实施椎管内分娩镇痛可以明显缓解疼痛并降低阴道试产的中转剖宫产率,第一和第二产程时间可能会延长,但并不影响母儿分娩结局,是一种安全有效的分娩镇痛方式。

Objective

To investigate the effect of intraspinal analgesia on vaginal delivery of scar uterus and the outcome of mother and child.

Methods

221 patients with scar uterus, which included 110 pregnant women receiving intraspinal delivery analgesia and 111 pregnant women without receiving intraspinal delivery analgesia, were retrospectively analyzed in our hospital from January 2017 to June 2020. The general conditions of the subjects were statistically analyzed. The effects of analgesia in spinal canal delivery on the labor process and the outcomes of mother and child during vaginal delivery with scar uterus were compared.

Results

There were no significant differences in age, body mass index (BMI), gestational age, blood loss at birth, neonatal weight and hospitalization time before delivery comparing in the two groups (P>0.05). The first stage of labor in scar uterine analgesia group [(379.35±145.85)min] were significantly statistically longer than those in scar uterine without analgesia group [(334.61±150.65)min] (P=0.012). The second stage of labor in scar uterine analgesia group [(63.57±26.20)min] were significantly longer than those in scar uterine without analgesia group [(54.61±27.32)min] (P=0.002). There were no significant differences in the third stage of labor, perineal lateral resection and vaginal midwifery rates between the two groups (P>0.05). The artificial rupture of fetal membrane rate in scar uterine analgesia group [27 cases(24.55%)] was significantly higher than in scar uterine without analgesia group [14 cases(12.61%)] (P=0.023). The oxytocin usage rate in scar uterine analgesia group [33 cases(30%)] was significantly higher than that in scar uterine without analgesia group [20 cases(18.02%)] (P=0.037). The conversion rate of cesarean section in the group without scar uterus analgesia [14 cases(12.61%)] was significantly higher than that in scar uterus analgesia group [5 cases(4.55%)] (P=0.032). The conversion rate of intrapartum fever in scar uterus analgesia group [18 cases(16.36%)] was significantly higher than that in the group without scar uterus analgesia [7 cases(6.31%)] (P=0.018). There were no significant differences in 1-minute Apgar score, 5-minute Apgar score, neonatal asphyxia rate, perineal Ⅱ degree lacerations, postpartum hemorrhage and postpartum low back pain rate between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Intraspinal analgesia can significantly relieve pain and reduce cesarean section rate during vaginal birth after cesarean. The duration of the first and second labor may be prolonged, but it does not affect the outcome of mother and child delivery. It is a safe and effective method for childbirth analgesia.

表1 两组患者一般临床资料比较(±s)
表2 两组研究对象的产程及分娩结局
表3 两组研究对象的并发症及新生儿结局
[1]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 剖宫产手术的专家共识(2014)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(10): 721-724.
[2]
刘正平,吴淑贞,饶珈铭,等.剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩的安全性及影响因素分析[J].中华产科急救电子杂志,2019,8(4): 235-240.
[3]
Krispin E, Hiersch L, Wilk GY, et al. Association between prior vaginal birth after cesarean and subsequent labor outcome [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2018, 31(8): 1066-1072.
[4]
Wang Q, Zheng SX, Ni YF, et al. The effect of labor epidural analgesia on maternal-fetal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2018, 298(1): 89-96.
[5]
Ye Y, Song X, Liu L, et al. Effects of patient-controlled epidural analgesia on uterine electromyography during spontaneous onset of labor in term nulliparous women [J]. Reprod Sci, 2015, 22(11): 1350-1357.
[6]
Allana Munro, George Ronald B, Allen Victoria M, et al. The impact of analgesic intervention during the second stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study[J].Can J Anaesth, 2018, 65(11): 1240-1247.
[7]
Susanne GB, Mike C, Cecily B, et al. Labour characteristics of women achieving successful vaginal birth after caesarean section in three European countries [J]. Midwifery, 2019,7(74): 36-43.
[8]
Shah U, Bellows P, Drexler K, et al. Comparison of induction of labor methods for unfavorable cervices in trial of labor after cesarean delivery [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2017,30(9): 1010-1015.
[9]
Sultan P, Segal S. Epidural-Related Maternal Fever: Still a Hot Topic, But What Arethe Burning Issues?[J]. Anesth Analg, 2020, 130(2): 318-320.
[10]
Sharpe EE, Arendt KW. Epidural Labor Analgesia and Maternal Fever [J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol,2017, 60(2): 365-374.
[11]
Yin H, Hu R, A cohort study of the impact of epidural analgesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes [J].J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2019, 45(8): 1435-1441.
[12]
Malevic A, Jatuzis D, Paliulyte V, et al. Epidural Analgesia and Back Pain after Labor [J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2019, 55(7): 354-362.
[13]
Hidalgo-Lopezosa P, Hidalgo-Maestre, María. Risk of uterine rupture in vaginal birth after cesarean: systematic review [J]. Enferm Clin, 2017, 27(1): 28-39.
[1] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[7] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[8] 冯丹艳, 曹晓辉, 史玉霞. 血清脂联素与胎盘亮氨酸氨肽酶对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[9] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[10] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[11] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[12] 吴晓翔, 杨波, 李景漩, 张凤玲, 郭桂辉, 郑少培. 脐动脉超声检查联合NLR、sFlt-1/PLGF对妊娠高血压综合征患者不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[13] 张丽姿, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的不良结局及远期影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
[14] 李群颖, 郑丽婷, 于燕. 妇科手术史患者妊娠期子宫破裂临床研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 98-102.
[15] 郑晓芳, 魏宋荃, 黄真轩, 吴文诗, 李桂民, 张红霞, 江庆萍, 陈敦金, 余琳. 子痫前期合并胎儿生长受限的妊娠结局及胎盘病理改变的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 85-92.
阅读次数
全文


摘要