切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 173 -178. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2025.03.009

论著

Macy模式培训方案在危重孕产妇中应用效果的研究
杨嘉琳1, 冉述敏2, 周倩瑜2, 刘畅2, 任帅2, 刘晓绛2,()   
  1. 1510150 广东省广州市广州医科大学附属第三医院重症医学科
    2510150 广东省广州市广州医科大学附属第三医院医务科
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-16 出版日期:2025-08-18
  • 通信作者: 刘晓绛
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科学技术研究(A2022484)

Application of a Macy model-based communication training program in critical obstetric patients

Jialin Yang1, Shumin Ran2, Qianyu Zhou2, Chang Liu2, Shuai Ren2, Xiaojiang Liu2,()   

  1. 1Intensive Care Unit, the Third Affiliated hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, China
    2Medical Affairs Department, the Third Affiliated hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, China
  • Received:2025-05-16 Published:2025-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Xiaojiang Liu
引用本文:

杨嘉琳, 冉述敏, 周倩瑜, 刘畅, 任帅, 刘晓绛. Macy模式培训方案在危重孕产妇中应用效果的研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 173-178.

Jialin Yang, Shumin Ran, Qianyu Zhou, Chang Liu, Shuai Ren, Xiaojiang Liu. Application of a Macy model-based communication training program in critical obstetric patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2025, 14(03): 173-178.

目的

探讨基于Macy模式的沟通培训方案对危重孕产妇进行医患沟通效果的影响。

方法

采用前瞻性研究方法选取我院重症医学科自2023年1月至2024年6月收治的危重孕产妇198例及医护人员32名,按照不同的培训时间分组,分为对照组(医护人员16名,孕产妇102例,培训时间2023年1月至2023年9月)与观察组(医护人员16名,孕产妇96例,培训时间2023年10月至2024年6月);对照组医护人员采取常规医患沟通培训,观察组医护人员实施医患Macy模式沟通培训,培训内容聚焦"启发患者观点、患者教育及治疗方案协商"等,对比两组医护人员培训前后的培训效果,同时对比两组培训后涉及到的198例危重孕产妇对医护人员沟通情况反馈的满意度。

结果

观察组与对照组的"启发并理解患者的观点"评分分别为(3.50±0.42)分与(3.11±0.64)分(t=2.038)、"协商并制定治疗方案"评分(3.49±0.42)分与(3.02±0.62)分(t=2.094)、"患者教育"评分(3.30±0.56)分与(2.90±0.52)分(t=2.511),差异有统计学意义(P值均<0.05);"准备与评估、信息收集、患者评估、查体过程中进行沟通及结束交流"两组评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组危重症产妇的满意度为90例(93.80%)明显高于对照组77例(75.5%)( χ2=11.245),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

基于Macy模式构建的沟通培训方案能够有效提升医护人员的沟通技能,危重孕产妇对此类沟通反馈出的满意度较高。

Objective

To investigate the effect of a Macy model-based communication training program on doctor-patient communication in critically ill pregnant women.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted, involving 198 critically ill pregnant women and 32 healthcare providers admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of our hospital from January 2023 to June 2024. Participants were divided into two groups based on different training periods: a control group (16 healthcare providers and 102 pregnant women, trained from January 2023 to September 2023) and an observation group (16 healthcare providers and 96 pregnant women, trained from October 2023 to June 2024). Medical staff in the control group received conventional doctor-patient communication training, while those in the observation group underwent Macy model-based communication training, focusing on ″eliciting patient perspectives, patient education, and treatment plan negotiation.″ The training outcomes of medical staff in both groups were compared before and after training. Additionally, the satisfaction feedback from the 198 critically ill pregnant women regarding the communication with medical staff after training was compared between the two groups after training.

Results

After the training, the scores of the observation group in ″eliciting and understanding the patient′s perspective, ″ ″shared decision-making, ″ and ″patient education″ were (3.50±0.42), (3.49±0.42), and (3.30±0.56) points, respectively. In comparison, the control group scored (3.11±0.64), (3.02±0.62), and (2.90±0.52) points in the corresponding domains. The post-training scores in these three aspects were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group, with statistically significant differences (t=2.038, 2.094, 2.511; P<0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups after training in the domains of preparation and assessment, information gathering, patient evaluation, communication during physical examination, and closing the consultation (P>0.05). Moreover, the satisfaction rate of critically ill obstetric patients in the observation group was 93.80%, significantly higher than that in the control group (75.5%), with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=11.245, P<0.05).

Conclusions

The communication training program based on the Macy model effectively enhances the communication skills of healthcare providers, and critically ill pregnant women showed high satisfaction with this communication approach.

表1 两组医护人员培训前后的评分情况(分,±s)
表2 培训后两组医护人员沟通能力评分比较(分,±s)
[1]
Cämmerer J, Martin O, Rockenbauch K. Learning doctor-patient communication-evaluating the effectiveness of the communication training course at Leipzig University from the students′ point of view[J]. GMS J Med Educ201633(3):Doc43.
[2]
Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues[J]. Soc Sci Med200561(7):1516-1528.
[3]
Kalet A, Pugnaire MP, Cole-Kelly K, et al. Teaching communication in clinical clerkships: models from the Macy initiative in health communications[J]. Acad Med200479(6):511-520.
[4]
黄茂鑫,张航,何锴琳,等. 6S延伸医患沟通模式下的医患沟通探讨[J]. 清远职业技术学院学报201912(4):67-72.
[5]
侯胜田,张永康. 主要医患沟通模式及6S延伸模式探讨[J]. 医学与哲学201435(1):54-57.
[6]
Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Carroli G, et al. The world health organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health: study protocol[J]. BMC Health Serv Res201111:286.
[7]
Wong K, Schwam ZG, Arrighi-Allisan AE, et al. Sharing in-office otoendoscopy recordings may improve patient satisfaction: a prospective cohort study[J]. Patient Educ Couns2022105(10):3160-3163.
[8]
胡江蔺,刘雪云,张欲晓,等. 基于PSQ-18量表的居民社区卫生服务满意度及影响因素研究[J]. 现代预防医学201744(11):1991-1994,1999.
[9]
阎萍,董晓静,胡丽娜,等. 危急重症孕产妇诊断标准及研究现状[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志201733(10):1088-1090.
[10]
侯胜田,王海星. 国外医患沟通模式对我国和谐医患关系构建的启示[J]. 医学与社会201427(2):51-54.
[11]
王莎莎,詹丽英,方婷,等. CICARE沟通模式用于危重孕产妇快速康复护理的效果与价值[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版)202243(4):537-541.
[12]
Mohd Salim NA, Roslan NS, Hod R, et al. Exploring critical components of physician-patient communication: a qualitative study of lay and professional perspectives[J]. Healthcare (Basel)202311(2):162.
[13]
彭涛,汤镇海,邹川,等. 全科医师规范化培训中医患沟通现状调查[J]. 中华全科医学202220(1):134-137,168.
[14]
Engelsma C. Sharing a medical decision[J]. Med Health Care Philos202427(1):3-14.
[15]
Almotery A, Bahamil AA, Alsehli HS, et al. Bridging communication gaps: a study on effective patient communication among respiratory therapy students and interns[J]. Cureus202416(5):e60484.
[16]
何泓,黄美娟,陈敦金. 情景模拟演练对提高严重产后出血患者救治能力的分析[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志202110(3): 174-178.
[17]
柯彩萍,王晓怡,沈健,等. 沙盘模拟在产科专科培训的应用初探[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志20209(1):59-64.
[1] 张洋, 刘志燕, 王先美, 孙燕, 曾钰. ICU 患者失禁相关性皮炎风险预测模型的系统评价[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 31-37.
[2] 程碧辉, 勾竹, 周茜, 杨晓敏, 李容. 抗精神疾病药物孕期治疗对严重精神障碍孕妇妊娠结局的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(03): 304-312.
[3] 李聪, 徐艳, 吴铭, 丁瑞东, 王军. 极低出生体重儿出生时血清25-羟维生素D水平与其生后早期喂养不耐受关系的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 309-314.
[4] 陈川, 杨太珠, 何泽凤. 肾脏彩色多普勒超声结果对儿童重症医学科急性肾损伤患儿的辅助诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 219-226.
[5] 刘庆倩, 乔林霞, 曹亦陶, 孙晓君, 黄锋. 新生儿多重耐药菌感染危险因素及超敏C-反应蛋白与白蛋白比值的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 335-342.
[6] 李占结, 张永祥, 周苏明, 刘波, 武星. 非重症监护病房多重耐药菌感染来源及分布[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 1-8.
[7] 陈晨, 鲁厚清. 血乳酸水平联合NLR对ICU重症肺炎预后风险预测[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 551-553.
[8] 高磊, 赵卉, 郑凌, 叶静. 呼吸重症监护病房院内获得性肺炎病原学特点及多因素Logistic回归分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 524-528.
[9] 刘佳微, 达哇卓玛, 冶挺, 赵晓宇, 王梅英, 马四清. 2017—2020年青海省人民医院综合ICU医院感染目标监测分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 33-37.
[10] 马慧颖, 魏玉梅. 妊娠合并糖尿病酮症酸中毒的诊治[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 223-227.
[11] 曾华华, 孙雯, 高美鸳, 贺芳. 妊娠晚期子宫扭转一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 158-164.
[12] 李瑞瑞, 黄楚君, 龚景进, 贺芳. 新生儿窒息产前产时危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2022, 11(02): 94-98.
[13] 赵宁, 陈娟媚, 杨其霖, 莫沛. 急性心肌梗死患者住院病死率和纤维蛋白原水平的非线性关系[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 32-37.
[14] 罗明先. 基于PDCA循环的过渡期护理对老年人瓣膜置换术后ICU出科时期的干预效果[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2022, 09(02): 31-34.
[15] 童洪杰, 潘飞艳, 邵兴, 张晓玲, 倪红英, 陈琨. 老年重症患者骨质流失相关危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2022, 09(02): 22-26.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?