切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 33 -37. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2022.01.008

论著

不同亚型子痫前期患者母儿结局分析
杜培丽1, 孙雯1, 苏春宏1, 张春芳1, 余琳1, 贺芳1, 杜丽丽1, 陈兢思1, 陈敦金1,()   
  1. 1. 510105 广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科 广东省产科重大疾病重点实验室 广州重症孕产妇救治中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-12 出版日期:2022-02-18
  • 通信作者: 陈敦金
  • 基金资助:
    国自然科学基金重点项目(81830045)

Analysis of maternal and fetal outcomes in different subtype of preeclampsia

Peili Du1, Wen Sun1, Chunhong Su1, Chunfang Zhang1, Lin Yu1, Fang He1, Lili Du1, Jingsi Chen1, Dunjin Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangzhou Medical Center for Critical Pregnant Women, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2021-10-12 Published:2022-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Dunjin Chen
引用本文:

杜培丽, 孙雯, 苏春宏, 张春芳, 余琳, 贺芳, 杜丽丽, 陈兢思, 陈敦金. 不同亚型子痫前期患者母儿结局分析[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2022, 11(01): 33-37.

Peili Du, Wen Sun, Chunhong Su, Chunfang Zhang, Lin Yu, Fang He, Lili Du, Jingsi Chen, Dunjin Chen. Analysis of maternal and fetal outcomes in different subtype of preeclampsia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(01): 33-37.

目的

分析不同亚型子痫前期患者的母儿结局。

方法

回顾性分析2009年1月1日至2019年12月31日在广州医科大学附属第三医院分娩的2960例单胎子痫前期患者早产组与足月产组、早发型组与晚发型组的临床资料及母儿结局。

结果

(1)母亲结局:①早产组与足月产组剖宫产率分别为(80.85% vs 61.67%, χ2=1.327)、入住重症监护病房率(11.84% vs 2.25%, χ2=86.844),P值均<0.05;②早发型与晚发型剖宫产率分别为(77.61% vs 70.30%, χ2=1.327,P<0.05)、入住重症监护病房率(13.00% vs 4.55%, χ2=69.158,P<0.05)。(2)新生儿结局:①早产组与足月产组在新生儿出生平均体重[(1472.19±673.50)g与(3067.49±523.92)g,Z=-42.4],活产比例(81.35% vs 99.31%, χ2=2.204),新生儿窒息率(6.39% vs 0.79%, χ2=53.51)P均<0.05。②早发型组与晚发型组新生儿出生体重[(1169.53±482.39)g vs(2765.37±683.22)g,Z=-43.895],活产比例(74.64% vs 98.31%, χ2=3.926),新生儿窒息率(8.71% vs 1.31%, χ2=86.82),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

子痫前期患者早产组与足月产组相比,早产组母体及新生儿结局均较差。早发型与晚发型子痫前期相比,早发型母儿结局均较差。

Objective

To analyze the maternal and neonatal outcomes of patients with different subtype of preeclampsia.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data and maternal and infant outcomes of 2960 singleton patients with or without early-onset/late onset preeclampsia, who delivered from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2019 in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University.

Results

(1) Maternal outcomes: ① Compared with the preterm preeclampsia group and term preeclalmpsia group, the rates of cesarean section were 80.85% and 61.67%, respectively ( χ2=1.327), the rates of admission to the intensive care unit was respectively 11.84% and 2.25% ( χ2=86.844); ② The rates of early-onset preeclampsia and late-onset preeclampsia cesarean section was 77.61% and 70.30%, respectively ( χ2=1.327, P<0.05). Admission rate of intensive care unit was 13.00% and 4.55%, respiectively in early-onset group and late-onset group ( χ2=69.158, P<0.05). (2) Neonatal outcomes: ① The mean birth weight of newborns was respectively (1472.19±673.50)g and (3067.49±523.92)g (Z=-42.4), the proportion of live births was respectively 81.35% and 99.31% comparing in early-onset group and late-onset group ( χ2=2.204). The rate of neonatal asphyxia was 6.39% and 0.79%, respectively in two groups ( χ2=53.51, all P<0.05). ② Neonatal birth weight in early-onset group and late-onset group was respectively (1169.53±482.39)g and (2765.37±683.22)g (Z=-43.895), live birth ratio was 74.64% and 98.31% ( χ2=3.926), the rate of neonatal asphyxia was 8.71% and 1.31%, comparing in the two groups ( χ2=86.82). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with preterm preeclampsia and term preeclampsia, the maternal and neonatal outcomes were worse in preterm preeclampsia. Compared with the late-onset group, maternal and child outcomes were worse in the early-onset group.

表1 2960例子痫前期孕妇早产组与足月产组、早发型组与晚发型组一般资料比较
表2 早产组与足月产组、早发型与晚发型子痫前期孕妇妊娠结局的比较
表3 早产组与足月产组、早发型与晚发型子痫前期孕妇新生儿结局的比较
[1]
ACOG. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia [J]. Obstet Gynecol2019133(1):e1-e25.
[2]
Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention [J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2019145 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-33.
[3]
谢幸,孔北华,段涛主编.妇产科学[M].9版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:84,204,175.
[4]
Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early- versus late-onset disease [J].Am J Obstet Gynecol2013209(6):544.el-544.el2.
[5]
Ponticelli C, Moroni G. Is preeclampsia a risk for end-stage renal disease? [J].Kidney Int201996(3):547-549.
[6]
Wu P, Haththotuwa R, Kwok CS, et al. Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].Circ Cardiovase Qual Outcomes201710(2):1-9.
[7]
Irgens HU, Reisaeter L, Irgens LM, et al. Long term mortality of mothers and fathers after pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study [J].BMJ2001323(7323):1213-1217.
[8]
史春,张美龄,韩燕媚,等. 早发型子痫前期发病危险因素分析 [J]. 临床军医杂志 202149(6):666-667+670.
[9]
李维,杨孜,王海玲,等. 子痫前期复发影响因素临床研究 [J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志201430(10):780-785.
[10]
杨怡珂,漆洪波.美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)"妊娠期高血压和子痫前期指南2019版"要点解读(第一部分)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志201935(8):895-899.
[11]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组.妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志202055(4):227-238.
[12]
Riise HK, Sulo G, Tell GS, et al. Incident coronary heart disease after preeclampsia: role of reduced fetal growth,preterm delivery, and parity [J].J Am Heart Assoc20176(3):1-12.
[13]
季燕雯,陈先侠,王海霞,等. 早发型子痫前期不良妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J]. 实用医学杂志202036(12):1590-1594.
[14]
Snydal S.Major changes in diagnosis and management of preeclampsia [J].J Midwifery Womens Health, 201459(6):596-605.
[15]
雷少霞,韦备,朱元方,等.早发型重度子痫前期分娩孕周对母儿预后的影响[J].热带医学杂志202020(8):1079-1081+1089
[16]
卢丽敏,赫英东,陈倩,等.早发型重度子痫前期患者分娩孕周对母儿结局的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志201045(11):829-832
[17]
Churchill D, Duley L, Thornton JG, et al. Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre-eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks′ gestation [J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev201810:1-41.
[18]
Haddad B, Sibai BM. Expectant management in pregnancies with severe pre-eclampsia [J]. Semin Perinatol, 200933(3):143-151.
[1] 杜佳丽, 鲍睿, 乔春红, 韩伟. 中孕期宫颈功能不全孕妇经阴道紧急宫颈环扎术后不良妊娠结局预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 403-409.
[2] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[3] 薛静, 孙雅楠, 朱丽丽, 李淑红. 妊娠期急性脂肪肝孕产妇诊疗及其妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 312-321.
[4] 陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[5] 贾赛君, 张英, 万佳义. 妊娠合并亚临床甲状腺功能减退孕妇的妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[6] 李博, 马秀岩, 孙杰. lncRNA TINCR对滋养层HTR-8/SVneo细胞生物学行为的影响及其机制[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 167-172.
[7] 俞慧慧, 尹宗智. 妊娠期胃穿孔[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 209-213.
[8] 鲁珊, 姚蕴珊, 廖色坭, 陈子恩, 张一剑, 蓝健皓, 魏薇, 刘艳杨, 陈艳红, 陈敦金. 妊娠合并急性阑尾炎100例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
[9] 汪文雁, 郑剑兰, 朱丽慈. 体外受精-胚胎移植术后妊娠患者孕产期风险的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 220-226.
[10] 胡淼, 杜丽丽, 张丽姿, 林琳, 张瑜亮, 古士锋, 古仲嘉, 赖思莹, 梁景英, 刘雨, 黄敏珊, 黄媛媛, 黄晴晴, 罗世君, 陈敦金. 体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射受孕患者胎盘植入分级及围产结局的研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 183-189.
[11] 张舒沁, 赵扬玉. 体外受精-胚胎移植与妊娠期高血压疾病[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 79-83.
[12] 庄旭, 丁立, 许丽, 张宁, 张羽, 林建华. 慢性肾病孕妇肾脏超声异常与不良妊娠结局的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 100-105.
[13] 徐琦, 彭小芳, 杜涛, 王霞妹, 张蜀宁, 陈曼绮, 郭勤敏, 黄泽薇, 付帅. COL1A2基因变异致胎儿期及成年后成骨不全家系的相关研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 106-111.
[14] 王晓艳, 朱利平, 侯顺玉, 岳永飞. 椎管内分娩镇痛对B族溶血性链球菌阳性孕妇阴道分娩结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 112-116.
[15] 刘文易, 高晓彤, 汤景, 麦卓瑶, 祝丽琼, 陈慧. 体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠合并绒毛膜下血肿患者妊娠结局的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 93-99.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?