The risk factors of recurrent preeclampsia

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2021.02.008

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of recurrent preeclampsia.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on 193 patients from January 2009 to December 2019 in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Women with consecutive deliveries within this time frame and complicated with preeclampsia in the first delivery were included in this cohort. According to whether the second pregnancy was complicated with preeclampsia, they were divided into the recurrent preeclampsia group (56 cases) and the non-recurrent preeclampsia group (137 cases). Data was analyzed with Chi-square test and binary logistic regression.

Results

(1) Compared with the non-recurrence group, the recurrence group has higher rate of more than 2 times of parities (58.93% vs 48.91%), shorter interval of pregnancy (19.65%、25.00%、16.07%、39.39% vs 3.65%、29.93%、26.28%、40.15%) and lower rate of vaginal delivery history(17.86% vs 37.23%), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). (2) Compared with one year interval of pregnancy, the 2 years interval of gestation (OR=0.109, 95%CI: 0.028-0.423), 3 years (OR=0.056, 95%CI: 0.013-0.246), more than 4 years (OR=0.080, 95%CI: 0.020-0.321) and a history of vaginal delivery (OR=0.199, 95%CI: 0.075-0.525) were protective factors for recurrent preeclampsia. Parties more than 2 times (OR=4.950, 95%CI: 1.848-13.262) was a risk factor for recurrent preeclampsia.

Conclusions

Pregnancy interval, history of vaginal delivery and parity are the main factors affecting the recurrent preeclampsia.

Key words: Preeclampsia, Recurrent, Risk factors

Wen Sun, Xiaoyi Wang, Lin Yu, Lin Lin, Yong Wang, Hao Yan, Yunzhe Xu, Shifeng Gu, Chunhong Su, Dunjin Chen. The risk factors of recurrent preeclampsia[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(02): 101-104.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhckjjdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2021.02.008

https://zhckjjdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2021/V10/I02/101

Figures/Tables 2

References 12

[1]	Barton JR, Sibai BM. Prediction and prevention of recurrent preeclampsia [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 112(2 Pt 1): 359-372.
[2]	Giannubilo SR, Landi B, Ciavattini A. Preeclampsia: what could happen in a subsequent pregnancy? [J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2014, 69(12)：747-762.
[3]	赫英东，陈倩．复发性子痫前期 [J]．中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2021，37(2)：145-149.
[4]	王媛，胡娅莉．既往子痫前期病史者再次妊娠的保健 [J]．中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2020，36(5)：394-397.
[5]	谢幸，孔北华，段涛，等．妇产科学[M].9版．北京：人民卫生出版社，2018: 487.
[6]	Hernández-Díaz S, Toh S, Cnattingius S. Risk of pre-eclampsia in first and subsequent pregnancies: prospective cohort study [J]. BMJ, 2009, 338: b2255.
[7]	Hnat MD, Sibai BM, Caritis S, et al. Perinatal outcome in women with recurrent preeclampsia compared with women who develop preeclampsia as nulliparas [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 186(3): 422-426.
[8]	Hiersch L, Shinar S, Melamed N, et al. Recurrent placenta-mediated complications in women with three consecutive deliveries [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 129(3): 416-421.
[9]	Cormick G, Betrán AP, Ciapponi A, et al. Inter-pregnancy interval and risk of recurrent pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Reprod Health, 2016, 13(1): 83.
[10]	Gabbay-Benziv R, Ashwal E, Hadar E, et al. Interpregnancy interval and the risk for recurrence of placental mediated pregnancy complications [J]. J Perinat Med, 2020, 48(4): 322-328.
[11]	Costa ML. Preeclampsia: reflections on how to counsel about preventing recurrence [J]. J ObstetGynaecol Can, 2015, 37(10): 887-893.
[12]	Tran PL, Robillard PY, Dumont C, et al. Recurrent or first preeclampsia in multiparae: a case-control study of singleton pregnancies in Reunion island [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2019, 240: 80-86.

分组	例数(例)	年龄		孕次		产次
分组	例数(例)	20～35岁	≥35岁	≤2次	>2次	≤1次	>1次
复发组	56	40(71.43)	16(28.57)	23(41.07)	33(58.93)	43(76.79)	13(23.21)
对照组	137	94(68.61)	43(31.39)	70(51.09)	67(48.91)	127(92.70)	10(7.30)
χ²值		0.149		1.600		9.592
P值		0.700		0.206		0.002
分组	例数(例)	阴道分娩史	孕前体重指数(kg/m²)				孕期规律产检
分组	例数(例)	阴道分娩史	<18.5	18.5～24.99	25～29.99	≥30	孕期规律产检
复发组	56	10(17.86)	5(8.93)	36(64.29)	11(19.64)	4(7.14)	19(33.93)
对照组	137	51(37.23)	14(10.22)	79(57.66)	32(23.36)	12(8.76)	61(44.53)
χ²值		6.899	0.738				1.839
P值		0.009	0.864				0.175
分组	例数(例)	妊娠合并内科疾病	妊娠间隔
分组	例数(例)	妊娠合并内科疾病	1年	2年	3年	≥4年
复发组	56	18(32.14)	11(19.64)	14(25.00)	9(16.07)	22(39.29)
对照组	137	36(26.28)	5(3.65)	41(29.93)	36(26.28)	55(40.15)
χ²值		0.679	13.040
P值		0.410	0.005

分组	例数(例)	年龄		孕次		产次
分组	例数(例)	20～35岁	≥35岁	≤2次	>2次	≤1次	>1次
复发组	56	40(71.43)	16(28.57)	23(41.07)	33(58.93)	43(76.79)	13(23.21)
对照组	137	94(68.61)	43(31.39)	70(51.09)	67(48.91)	127(92.70)	10(7.30)
χ²值		0.149		1.600		9.592
P值		0.700		0.206		0.002
分组	例数(例)	阴道分娩史	孕前体重指数(kg/m²)				孕期规律产检
分组	例数(例)	阴道分娩史	<18.5	18.5～24.99	25～29.99	≥30	孕期规律产检
复发组	56	10(17.86)	5(8.93)	36(64.29)	11(19.64)	4(7.14)	19(33.93)
对照组	137	51(37.23)	14(10.22)	79(57.66)	32(23.36)	12(8.76)	61(44.53)
χ²值		6.899	0.738				1.839
P值		0.009	0.864				0.175
分组	例数(例)	妊娠合并内科疾病	妊娠间隔
分组	例数(例)	妊娠合并内科疾病	1年	2年	3年	≥4年
复发组	56	18(32.14)	11(19.64)	14(25.00)	9(16.07)	22(39.29)
对照组	137	36(26.28)	5(3.65)	41(29.93)	36(26.28)	55(40.15)
χ²值		0.679	13.040
P值		0.410	0.005

项目		β值	Wald值	P值	OR值	95%CI值
妊娠间隔
	2年^a	-2.220	10.242	0.001	0.109	0.028～0.423
	3年^a	-2.889	14.502	0.000	0.056	0.013～0.246
	≥4年^a	-2.523	12.741	0.000	0.080	0.020～0.321
阴道分娩史		-1.615	10.621	0.001	0.199	0.075～0.525
产次		1.599	10.621	0.001	4.950	1.848～13.262

项目		β值	Wald值	P值	OR值	95%CI值
妊娠间隔
	2年^a	-2.220	10.242	0.001	0.109	0.028～0.423
	3年^a	-2.889	14.502	0.000	0.056	0.013～0.246
	≥4年^a	-2.523	12.741	0.000	0.080	0.020～0.321
阴道分娩史		-1.615	10.621	0.001	0.199	0.075～0.525
产次		1.599	10.621	0.001	4.950	1.848～13.262

[1]	Shaohua Zhang, Aiqi Lin, Yu Zhang, Xiaoyun Dong, Hongying Liu. Correlation between HLA gene and IL gene polymorphisms with recurrent spontaneous abortion [J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(03): 251-259.
[2]	Jinli Zhang, Maomao Xi, Zhigang Chu, Xiagang Luan, Nuo Chen, Deyun Wang, Weiguo Xie. Analysis of risk factors of early acute kidney injury in patients with massive burn injuries [J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2024, 19(04): 282-287.
[3]	Wenbin Luo, Wei Han. Analysis of risk factors related to moderate to severe myelosuppression in patients with pancreatic cancer after first chemotherapy and construction of prediction model [J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[4]	Guoyu Li, Yun Cong, Maimaitiaili Zulihumaer·, Tieying He. Risk factors and prediction model built for portal vein system thrombosis in patients with acute pancreatitis [J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 266-270.
[5]	Bin He, Jinfeng Ma. Risk factors for splenic hilar lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[6]	Yifei Gao, Genxiang Liu, Changhua Sun, Guangjun Zhou. Application of recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in unilateral thyroidectomy and central lymph node dissection without inflatable axillary approach [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 483-486.
[7]	Guandi Ding, Yun Huang, Zhen Cao, Gang Liu. Prediction of infectious complications after radical gastrectomy: Development and validation of a Nomogram model based on real-world data [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 261-266.
[8]	Yifei Gao, Genxiang Liu, Changhua Sun, Guangjun Zhou. Application of "RLN triangle" in endoscopic thyroidectomy through axillary approach [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 307-310.
[9]	Junlong Huang, Bolong Liu, Ruixiang Luo, Xiaoyang Li, Wenshuang Li, Zheng Liu, Jialiang Chen, Xiangfu Zhou. A combined analysis of clinical data and pelvic floor ultrasound data for exploring the risk factors of stress urinary incontinence [J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 323-330.
[10]	Jie Jiang, Cheng Shen, Yongsheng Pan, Xinfeng Chen, Zhenmin Liu, Hua Zhu, Bing Zheng. Analysis of risk factors and dual-energy CT features of uric acid calculi [J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 361-365.
[11]	Jinhong Zhou, Jianjie Wang, Xiaojun Xie. Analysis of incidence and risk factors of postoperative urinary retention after TAPP [J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 390-395.
[12]	Zhao Chen, Keli Zhong, Zhipeng Jiang, Yuxiang Fu, Baohang Fan, Wenfei Wu. Analysis of incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia after prostate cancer surgery [J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 396-401.
[13]	Xu Ji, Feng Zhu, Yechen Feng. Risk factors of biliary complications after organ-preserving pancreatectomy [J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(04): 509-514.
[14]	Huiying Chen, Minshan Qiu, Hanquan Shao. Construction and application effect of risk factor model for intestinal mucosal barrier function damage induced by sepsis [J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(05): 448-452.
[15]	Xiangqing Qin, Chen Zhu, Haiyin Zhang. Construction of a normogram model for predicting the risk of esophageal and gastric varices bleeding in cirrhosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(04): 330-335.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export