Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03): 168-175. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2024.03.008

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of influencing factors of premature birth in pregnant patients with assisted reproductive technology.

Rui Su1, Xuan Zhou1, Shulin Yang1, Chenyun Fang1, Suhua Chen1, Dongrui Deng1, Wanjiang Zeng1, Haiyi Liu1, Xun Gong1, Yuanyuan Wu1, Yanyan Liu1, Juan Xiao1, Jun Yu1, Mengzhou He1, Shufang Li1, Zizhuo Wang1, Xingguang Lin1, Jianli Wu1, Shaoshuai Wang1, Jing Yue1, Lei Jin1, Ling Feng1, Wencheng Ding1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
  • Received:2024-04-01 Online:2024-08-18 Published:2024-10-21
  • Contact: Wencheng Ding

Abstract:

Objective

This study aims to investigate the factors inducing premature birth among women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments.

Methods

The data of 369 pregnant patients who underwent ART delivered at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, from Jan. 2022 to Dec. 2023 were selected in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: premature birth group (n=189) and term delivery group (n=180). General data, ART-related materials, pregnancy complications, comorbidities, and neonatal status were examined in both groups. Differences between the groups were assessed using t-tests and chi-square tests. The logistic regression was utilized to identify independent risk factors for premature birth.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in the rate of twin pregnancies (40.7% vs 3.9%, χ2=71.212), pre-pregnancy body mass index [(22.78±3.71) kg/m2 vs (21.62±3.12) kg/m2, t=-2.952], primary infertility (63.8% vs 35.9%, χ2=21.069), in vitro fertilization (62.1% vs 42.2%, χ2=10.491), numbers of retrieved oocytes [(13.94±8.72) vs (13.54±7.28), t=-0.402], estradiol (E2) levels at the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) administration [(2906.5±1892.0) pg/ml vs (2598.18±1456.5) pg/ml, t=-1.493], premature rupture of membranes (9.5% vs 0, χ2=18.022), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (16.9% vs 6.1%, χ2=10.484), cervical insufficiency (6.3% vs 0.6%, χ2=9.105), and ovary-related disorders (6.3% vs 1.7%, χ2=5.184) in the premature birth group and term delivery group (P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regressive analysis showed that the risks of premature birth of pregnant women with twin pregnancies (OR=25.637, 95%CI: 8.782~74.844, P<0.001) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR=2.809, 95%CI: 1.149~6.865, P<0.05) were significantly increased.

Conclusions

Twin pregnancies, overweight and obesity in pre-pregnancy, history of primary infertility, application of in vitro fertilization, increased numbers of retrieved oocytes, elevated E2 levels at the day of HCG administration, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, cervical insufficiency, and ovary-related disorders are all the influenced factors of premature birth with ART. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and twin pregnancies are the factors independently affecting the premature birth.

Key words: Reproductive technology, assisted, Premature birth, Risk factors

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-81256537 E-mail: chankejijiuzazhi@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd