切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (03) : 133 -136. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2019.03.002

所属专题: 文献

专家论坛

辅助生育技术妊娠早产的防治
刘騱遥1, 漆洪波1,()   
  1. 1. 400016 重庆医科大学附属第一医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-13 出版日期:2019-08-18
  • 通信作者: 漆洪波
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划"生殖健康及重大出生缺陷防控研究"重点专项(2016YFC1000400)

Prevention and treatment of premature pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology

Yaoyao Liu1, Hongbo Qi1()   

  • Received:2019-06-13 Published:2019-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Hongbo Qi
引用本文:

刘騱遥, 漆洪波. 辅助生育技术妊娠早产的防治[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2019, 08(03): 133-136.

Yaoyao Liu, Hongbo Qi. Prevention and treatment of premature pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(03): 133-136.

随着辅助生育技术的不断发展和应用,其不良妊娠结局发生率高于自然妊娠的问题日渐突出,获得广泛关注。其中,早产是最常见、最严重的并发症之一,对早产儿有潜在、长期的影响。因此,要重视辅助生育技术妊娠早产的防治,并明确危险因素,探讨有效的干预措施。

With the development and the utilization of assisted reproductive technology, its higher rate of complications than natural pregnancy arouse universal attention. Preterm birth is one of the most common and severe complications, which has potential and long-term influence on the offspring. Therefore, the prevention and treatment of preterm birth associated with assisted reproductive technology should be strengthened, as well as studies exploring the risk factors and effective interventions.

[1]
Goisis A, Remes H, Martikainen P, et al. Medically assisted reproduction and birth outcomes: a within-family analysis using Finnish population registers [J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(10177): 1225-1232.
[2]
De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, et al. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)[J]. Hum Reprod, 2018, 33(9):1586-1601.
[3]
Ory SJ. The national epidemic of multiple pregnancy and the contribution of assisted reproductive technology[J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 100(4): 929-930.
[4]
Kulkarni AD, Jamieson DJ, Jones HW, Jr., et al. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(23): 2218-2225.
[5]
Wilson CL, Fisher JR, Hammarberg K, et al. Looking downstream: a review of the literature on physical and psychosocial health outcomes in adolescents and young adults who were conceived by ART[J]. Hum Reprod, 2011, 26(5): 1209-1219.
[6]
Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF, et al. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2017, 15(1): 6.
[7]
Martin AS, Chang J, Zhang Y, et al. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology [J]. Fertil Steril, 2017, 107(4): 954-960.
[8]
Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2012, 18(5): 485-503.
[9]
Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2013, 19(2): 87-104.
[10]
Sutcliffe AG, Ludwig M. Outcome of assisted reproduction [J]. Lancet (London, England), 2007, 370(9584): 351-359.
[11]
McDonald S, Murphy K, Beyene J, et al. Perinatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analyses [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 193(1): 141-152.
[12]
Kupka MS, Ferraretti AP, de Mouzon J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHREdagger[J]. Hum Reprod, 2014, 29(10): 2099-2113.
[13]
Li C, Zhao WH, Zhu Q, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a multi-center case-control study [J]. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015, 15: 187.
[14]
Pezeshki K, Feldman J, Stein DE, et al. Bleeding and spontaneous abortion after therapy for infertility [J]. Fertil Steril, 2000, 74(3): 504-508.
[15]
Schieve LA, Tatham L, Peterson HB, et al. Spontaneous abortion among pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technology in the United States [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 101(5 Pt 1): 959-967.
[16]
Vermey BG, Buchanan A, Chambers GM, et al. Are singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction technology (ART) associated with a higher risk of placental anomalies compared with non-ART singleton pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. BJOG, 2019, 126(2): 209-218.
[17]
Martin AS, Monsour M, Kissin DM, et al. Trends in Severe Maternal Morbidity After Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States, 2008-2012 [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 127(1): 59-66.
[18]
Yu HT, Yang Q, Sun XX, et al. Association of birth defects with the mode of assisted reproductive technology in a Chinese data-linkage cohort [J]. Fertil Steril, 2018, 109(5): 849-856.
[19]
Hwang SS, Dukhovny D, Gopal D, et al. Health of Infants After ART-Treated, Subfertile, and Fertile Deliveries [J]. Pediatrics, 2018, 142(2). pii: e20174069
[20]
Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 103(3): 551-563.
[21]
American College of O, Gynecologists′ Committee on Obstetric P, Committee on G, Food US, Drug A. Committee Opinion No 671: Perinatal Risks Associated With Assisted Reproductive Technology [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 128(3): e61-e68.
[22]
Seggers J, Pontesilli M, Ravelli ACJ, et al. Effects of in vitro fertilization and maternal characteristics on perinatal outcomes: a population-based study using siblings [J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 105(3): 590.e592-598.e592.
[23]
Barbuscia A, Mills MC. Cognitive development in children up to age 11 years born after ART-a longitudinal cohort study [J]. Hum Reprod, 2017, 32(7):1482-1488.
[24]
Goisis A, Schneider DC, Myrskyla M. Secular changes in the association between advanced maternal age and the risk of low birth weight: A cross-cohort comparison in the UK [J]. Popul Stud (Camb), 2018, 72(3): 381-397.
[25]
Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects--a systematic review [J]. Hum Reprod, 2005, 20(2): 328-338.
[26]
Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, Freiesleben N, et al. Vanishing twins: a predictor of small-for-gestational age in IVF singletons [J]. Hum Reprod, 2007, 22(10): 2707-2714.
[27]
Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, et al. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology [J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346(10): 731-737.
[28]
Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2006, 28(3): 220-233.
[29]
Iams JD, Romero R, Culhane JF, et al. Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth [J]. Lancet, 2008, 371(9607): 164-175.
[30]
Norman JE, Marlow N, Messow CM, et al. Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial [J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10033): 2106-2116.
[31]
Stock SJ, Ismail KM. Which intervention reduces the risk of preterm birth in women with risk factors?[J]. BMJ, 2016, 355:i5206.
[32]
National Collaborating Centre for Women′s and Children′s Health (UK). Preterm Labour and Birth. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK)[J]. NICE Guideline, No. 25, 2015.
[33]
Nicolaides KH, Syngelaki A, Poon LC, et al. A Randomized Trial of a Cervical Pessary to Prevent Preterm Singleton Birth [J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 374(11): 1044-1052.
[34]
Magee LA, De Silva DA, Sawchuck D, et al. No. 376-Magnesium Sulphate for Fetal Neuroprotection[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2019, 41(4): 505-522.
[35]
Practice Bulletin No. 159: Management of Preterm Labor [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 127(1): e29-e38.
[36]
Medley N, Poljak B, Mammarella S, et al. Clinical guidelines for prevention and management of preterm birth: a systematic review [J]. BJOG, 2018, 125(11): 1361-1369.
[1] 庄蕙嘉, 岳志成, 钟坤岑, 朱慧莉. 乳腺癌患者生育力保存的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 238-242.
[2] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[3] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[4] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[5] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[6] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[7] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[8] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[9] 胡诤贇, 史建伟, 申建伟, 王冰, 蒋春苗, 刘冲. 基于机器学习鉴定早产儿支气管肺发育不良的关键基因[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 446-454.
[10] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[11] 胡金科, 钟文. 妊娠期输尿管结石的处理与转归[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 377-381.
[12] 王跃, 唐敏, 李鹏超, 吕强. 妊娠期膀胱副神经节瘤伴严重出血一例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-411.
[13] 杨聚荣. 透析患者妊娠的管理[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 300-300.
[14] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[15] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
阅读次数
全文


摘要