切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 89 -95. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2021.02.006

论著

子痫前期并发胎儿生长受限的临床特征及妊娠结局分析
陈娟娟1, 孙雯1, 苏春宏1, 林琳1, 周燕媚1, 余琳1, 杜丽丽1, 陈兢思1, 陈敦金1,()   
  1. 1. 510150 广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科 广东省产科重大疾病重点实验室 广州重症孕产妇救治中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-08 出版日期:2021-05-18
  • 通信作者: 陈敦金
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(81830045)

Clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of preeclampsia complicated with fetal growth restriction

Juanjuan Chen1, Wen Sun1, Chunhong Su1, Lin Lin1, Yanmei Zhou1, Lin Yu1, Lili Du1, Jingsi Chen1, Dunjin Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou Medical Center for Critical Pregnant Women, Guangzhou, 510150, China
  • Received:2021-02-08 Published:2021-05-18
  • Corresponding author: Dunjin Chen
引用本文:

陈娟娟, 孙雯, 苏春宏, 林琳, 周燕媚, 余琳, 杜丽丽, 陈兢思, 陈敦金. 子痫前期并发胎儿生长受限的临床特征及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2021, 10(02): 89-95.

Juanjuan Chen, Wen Sun, Chunhong Su, Lin Lin, Yanmei Zhou, Lin Yu, Lili Du, Jingsi Chen, Dunjin Chen. Clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of preeclampsia complicated with fetal growth restriction[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(02): 89-95.

目的

探讨子痫前期并发胎儿生长受限(fetal growth restriction,FGR)的临床特征及母儿结局。

方法

回顾性分析2009年1月1日至2019年12月31日在广州医科大学附属第三医院产科就诊并分娩的单胎子痫前期患者的病例资料,根据是否合并FGR,分为FGR组和对照组,分析两组的临床特征及母儿结局。

结果

(1)2960例单胎子痫前期患者合并FGR的发生率为20.68%,早发型及晚发型子痫前期合并FGR的发生率分别为30.3%及13.7%(P<0.05);(2)两组受教育程度、妊娠次数、受孕方式及入院类型比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);(3)FGR组活产分娩孕周[(33.44±3.13)周]明显小于对照组[(35.82±3.78)周],FGR组死胎率(15.03%)、剖宫产率(80.39%)及住院天数[(9.21±4.70)d],均明显高于对照组[10.78%、71.12%、(8.45±6.34)d],FGR组胎儿窘迫(24.18%)、羊水过少(13.89%)的发生率明显高于对照组(10.09%、6.39%),差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);(4)FGR组≥28周不同孕周阶段的新生儿平均体重、平均身长及平均头围均低于对照组,FGR组新生儿窒息(21.0%)、新生儿呼吸窘迫(18.65%)、肺透明膜病(4.62%)、新生儿贫血(17.69%)的发生率都明显高于对照组(14.1%、10.60%、2.82%、7.97%),差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

子痫前期与FGR的发生密切相关,子痫前期患者合并FGR时出现不良母儿结局的风险增加。

Objective

To investigate the clinical features and maternal and neonatal outcomes of preeclampsia complicated with fetal growth restriction (FGR).

Methods

The clinical data of patients with preeclampsia, who were admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether they were complicated with FGR, they were divided into FGR group and control group. The clinical characteristics and maternal and neonatal outcomes of two groups were analyzed.

Results

(1) The incidence of FGR in 2960 cases of preeclampsia was 20.68%. The incidences of FGR in early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia were 30.3% and 13.7%, respectively (P<0.05). (2) There were significant differences in educational level, gravidity, mode of conception and type of admission between the two groups (all P<0.05). (3) In FGR group, the gestational age of live birth (33.44±3.13) was significantly less than that in control group (35.82±3.78), the stillbirth rate (15.03%), cesarean section rate (80.39%) and hospital stay [(9.21±4.70)d] were significantly higher than those in control group [10.78%, 71.12%, 8.45±6.34 (d)], the incidences of fetal distress (24.18%) and oligohydramnios (13.89%) in FGR group were significantly higher than those in control group (10.09% and 6.39%) (P<0.05). (4) The results showed that the average weight, length and head circumference of newborns in FGR group were lower than those in control group. The incidence of neonatal asphyxia (21.0%), neonatal respiratory distress (18.65%), pulmonary hyaline membrane disease (4.62%) and neonatal anemia (17.69%) in FGR group were significantly higher than those in control group (14.1%, 10.60%, 2.82% and 7.97%), the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Preeclampsia is closely related to the occurrence of FGR. Preeclampsia patients complicated with FGR have an increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

表1 两组患者一般特征比较[例(%)]
表2 两组患者妊娠结局比较
表3 两组患者分娩孕周构成比[例(%)]
表4 两组患者妊娠合并症及并发症比较[例(%)]
表5 两组患者新生儿一般情况比较(±s)
表6 两组患者新生儿并发症比较[例(%)]
[1]
Shah S, Gupta A. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy [J]. Cardiol Clin, 2019, 37(3): 345-354.
[2]
Mol BWJ, Roberts CT, Thangaratinam S, et al. Pre-eclampsia [J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10022): 999-1011.
[3]
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin No.204: Fetal Growth Restriction [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 133(2): e97-e109.
[4]
谢幸,孔北华,段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 九版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2019: 83, 135.
[5]
朱丽,张蓉,张淑莲,等. 中国不同胎龄新生儿出生体重曲线研制[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2015, 53(2): 97-103.
[6]
Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis, and management recommendations for international practice [J]. Hypertension, 2018, 72(1): 24-43.
[7]
Li F, Qin J, Zhang S, et al. Prevalence of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Pregnancy Hypertens, 2021, 24: 13-21.
[8]
王萌璐,陈倩. 胎儿生长受限的影响因素 [J]. 发育医学电子杂志,2019, 7(1): 5-7.
[9]
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 133(1):1.
[10]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组. 妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2020, 55(4): 227-238.
[11]
中华医学会妇产科分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组.妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2015) [J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志,2015, 4(4): 206-213.
[12]
Khalil A, Surf N, Grande A, et a1. Fetal growth restriction: A marker of severity of early-onset pre-eclampsia [J]. Pregnancy Hypertens, 2012, 2(3): 220.
[13]
Redman CW, Sargent IL. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia [J]. Science, 2005, 308(5728): 1592-1594.
[14]
Hromadnikova I, Dvorakova L, Kotlabova K, et al. The prediction of gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction via the first trimester screening of plasma exosomal C19MC microRNAs [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(12): 2972.
[15]
Spinillo A, Cesari S, Bariselli S, et al. Placental lesions associated with oligohydramnios in fetal growth restricted (FGR) pregnancies [J]. Placenta, 2015, 36(5): 538-544.
[16]
Stergiotou I, Bijnens B, Cruz-Lemini M, et al. Maternal subclinical vascular changes in fetal growth restriction with and without pre-eclampsia [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 46(6): 706-712.
[17]
Milosevic-Stevanovic J, Krstic M, Radovic-Janosevic D, et al. Preeclampsia with and without intrauterine growth restriction-Two pathogenetically different entities?[J] Hypertens Pregnancy, 2016, 35(4): 573-582.
[18]
Burton GJ, Jauniaux E. Pathophysiology of placental-derived fetal growth restriction [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 218(2S): S745-S761.
[19]
Frusca T, Todros T, Lees C, et al. Outcome in early-onset fetal growth restriction is best combining computerized fetal heart rate analysis with ductus venosus Doppler: insights from the Trial of Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 218(2S): S783-S789.
[20]
Mitani M, Matsuda Y, Makino Y, et al. Clinical features of fetal growth restriction complicated later by preeclampsia [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2009, 35(5): 882-887.
[21]
Weiler J, Tong S, Palmer KR. Is fetal growth restriction associated with a more severe maternal phenotype in the setting of early onset pre-eclampsia? A retrospective study [J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(10): e26937.
[22]
王鑫,王婷婷,魏璞,等. 早发型子痫前期合并与未合并胎儿生长受限591例临床分析[J].中华围产医学杂志,2019, 22(6): 385-390.
[23]
Magee LA, Pels A, Helewa M, et al. Diagnosis,evaluation,and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy [J]. Pregnancy Hypertens, 2014, 4(2): 105-145.
[24]
Vest AR, Cho LS. Hypertension in pregnancy [J]. Curr Atheroscler Rep, 2014, 16(3): 395.
[25]
Maged AM, Hashem AM, Gad Allah SH, et al. The effect of loading dose of magnesium sulfate on uterine, umbilical, and fetal middle cerebral arteries Doppler in women with severe preeclampsia: A case control study [J]. Hypertens Pregnancy, 2016, 35(1): 91-99.
[1] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 范思涵, 叶彩玲, 纪学芹. 产前超声心动图在先天性血管环诊断中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 37-41.
[2] 梁越, 董晓秋, 李奇默, 李岩, 姚金来, 朴雪梅. 孕11~13+6周子宫动脉与左心室参数对子痫前期的预测模型构建与验证[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 42-48.
[3] 何雪威, 谷美玉, 吴亭亭. 超声子宫动脉及子宫内膜血流参数对不明原因复发性流产患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1158-1163.
[4] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[5] 薛静, 孙雅楠, 朱丽丽, 李淑红. 妊娠期急性脂肪肝孕产妇诊疗及其妊娠结局[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 312-321.
[6] 陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[7] 贾赛君, 张英, 万佳义. 妊娠合并亚临床甲状腺功能减退孕妇的妊娠结局[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[8] 李博, 马秀岩, 孙杰. lncRNA TINCR对滋养层HTR-8/SVneo细胞生物学行为的影响及其机制[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 167-172.
[9] 胡淼, 杜丽丽, 张丽姿, 林琳, 张瑜亮, 古士锋, 古仲嘉, 赖思莹, 梁景英, 刘雨, 黄敏珊, 黄媛媛, 黄晴晴, 罗世君, 陈敦金. 体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射受孕患者胎盘植入分级及围产结局的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 183-189.
[10] 庄旭, 丁立, 许丽, 张宁, 张羽, 林建华. 慢性肾病孕妇肾脏超声异常与不良妊娠结局的相关性研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 100-105.
[11] 徐琦, 彭小芳, 杜涛, 王霞妹, 张蜀宁, 陈曼绮, 郭勤敏, 黄泽薇, 付帅. COL1A2基因变异致胎儿期及成年后成骨不全家系的相关研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 106-111.
[12] 王晓艳, 朱利平, 侯顺玉, 岳永飞. 椎管内分娩镇痛对B族溶血性链球菌阳性孕妇阴道分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 112-116.
[13] 刘文易, 高晓彤, 汤景, 麦卓瑶, 祝丽琼, 陈慧. 体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠合并绒毛膜下血肿患者妊娠结局的临床研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 93-99.
[14] 张舒沁, 赵扬玉. 体外受精-胚胎移植与妊娠期高血压疾病[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 79-83.
[15] 李剑琦. 血清无细胞RNA铁死亡相关基因预测早发型子痫前期的初步研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 49-54.
阅读次数
全文


摘要