切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 96 -100. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2021.02.007

论著

早发型与晚发型子痫前期的临床特点及母儿结局分析
毕石磊1, 张丽姿2, 杜丽丽1, 陈敦金1,()   
  1. 1. 广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科 广东省产科重大疾病重点实验室 广州重症孕产妇救治中心 510150
    2. 南方医科大学南方医院妇产科,广州 510515
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-18 出版日期:2021-05-18
  • 通信作者: 陈敦金
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81830045); 国家重点研发计划资助(2016YFC1000405和2017YFC1001402); 广东省自然科学基金(2021A1515011039)

The clinical characteristics and maternal and neonatal outcomes of early and late onset preeclampsia

Shilei Bi1, Lizi Zhang2, Lili Du1, Dunjin Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou Medical Center for Critical Pregnant Women, Guangzhou 510150, China
    2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2021-01-18 Published:2021-05-18
  • Corresponding author: Dunjin Chen
引用本文:

毕石磊, 张丽姿, 杜丽丽, 陈敦金. 早发型与晚发型子痫前期的临床特点及母儿结局分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2021, 10(02): 96-100.

Shilei Bi, Lizi Zhang, Lili Du, Dunjin Chen. The clinical characteristics and maternal and neonatal outcomes of early and late onset preeclampsia[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(02): 96-100.

目的

分析早发型与晚发型子痫前期的临床特征及母儿结局。

方法

收集2015年1月至2020年12月6年间在广州医科大学附属第三医院分娩的诊断为子痫前期的单胎孕产妇2693例的临床资料,采用回顾性研究方法分析早发型(873例)与晚发型子痫前期孕妇(1820例)的临床特征及母儿结局。

结果

早发型和晚发型子痫前期患者孕次比较[(2.68±1.58)次与(2.27±1.38)次,Z=-6.80,(P<0.05)],转诊患者比例(42% vs 6.3%, χ2=519.02,P<0.05),合并慢性高血压比例(2.4% vs 0.8%, χ2=12.31,P<0.05),剖宫产率(77.8% vs 60.1%, χ2=82.35,P<0.05),胎盘早剥率(0.9% vs 0.3%, χ2=3.93,P<0.05),重症监护病房入住率(9.7% vs 2.4%, χ2=69.3,P<0.05),住院天数(9.44±4.76)d与(6.30±5.15)d,Z=-20.52,(P<0.05),死胎发生率(22.3% vs 0.3%, χ2=381.1,P<0.05)。

结论

早发型子痫前期与晚发型子痫前期患者临床特点不同,母儿围产期结局不同,两种子痫前期类型应被区分对待。

Objective

To analyze the clinical characteristics and maternal and perinatal outcomes of early and late onset preeclampsia.

Methods

2693 pregnant women with preeclampsia who delivered in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from 2015 to 2020 were recruited. The clinical characteristics and maternal and neonatal outcomes of early onset (873 cases) and late onset preeclampsia (1820 cases) were analyzed.

Results

The gravidity(2.68±1.58 vs 2.27±1.38, Z=-6.80, P<0.05), patients referred to hospital(42% vs 6.3%, χ2=519.02, P<0.05), and patients with chronic hypertension(2.4% vs 0.8%, χ2=12.31, P<0.05) were higher in the early onset preeclampsia group than the late onset preeclampsia group (P<0.05). The rate of cesarean section(77.8% vs 60.1%, χ2=82.35, P<0.05), placental abruption(0.9% vs 0.3%, χ2=3.93, P<0.05), admission to ICU(9.7% vs 2.4%, χ2=69.3, P<0.05) and hospitalization days [(9.44±4.76) vs (6.30±5.15), Z=-20.52, P<0.05] were significantly higher in the early onset preeclampsia group. The incidence of stillbirth(22.3% vs 0.8%, χ2=381.1, P<0.05) and neonatal death was higher in the early onset preeclampsia than the late onset preeclampsia group.

Conclusions

The clinical characteristics, maternal and perinatal outcomes of patients complicated with early onset preeclampsia and late onset preeclampsia are different. From the perspective of clinical characteristics, maternal and perinatal outcomes, the two types of preeclampsia should be treated differently.

表1 早发型和晚发型子痫前期临床特征比较
表2 早发型和晚发型子痫前期孕妇结局比较
表3 早发型和晚发型子痫前期患者的新生儿结局比较
[1]
American College of Obestetricians and Gynecologist. Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, No. 222 [J].Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 135(6): e237-e260.
[2]
Mol BWJ, Roberts CT, Thangaratinam S, et al. Pre-eclampsia [J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10022):999-1011.
[3]
Phipps EA, Thadhant R, Benzing T, et al. Pre-eclampsia: pathogenesis, novel diagnostics and therapies [J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2019, 15(5): 275-289.
[4]
Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early- versus late-onset disease [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 209(6):544.e1-e12.
[5]
谢幸,孔北华,段涛.妇产科学 [M].9版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:83.
[6]
韩菊香.早发型子痫前期重度妊娠结局的临床分析[J].实用妇科内分泌杂志,2016,3(3):131-133.
[7]
成志,王子莲,罗小华,等.不同产前检查情况与重度子痫前期及子痫的临床分析 [J/CD].中华产科急救电子杂志,2015,4(4):230-233.
[8]
Seeho SK, Algert CS, Roberts CL, et al. Early-onset preeclampsia appears to discourage subsequent pregnancy but the risks may be overestimated [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 215(6):785.e1-e8.
[9]
Jhee JH, Lee S, Park Y, et al. Prediction model development of late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning-based methods [J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(8):e0221202.
[10]
Abalos E, Cuesta C, Carroli G, et al. Pre-eclampsia, eclampsia and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a secondary analysis of the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health [J]. BJOG, 2014, 121 (Suppl 1):14-24.
[11]
Abalos E, Cuesta C, Grosso AL, et al. Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2013, 170(1):1-7.
[12]
Burton GJ, Redman CW, Roberts JM, et al. Pre-eclampsia: pathophysiology and clinical implications [J]. BMJ, 2019, 366:l2381.
[13]
Iacobelli S, Bonsante F, Robillard PY. Comparison of risk factors and perinatal outcomes in early onset and late onset preeclampsia: A cohort based study in Reunion Island [J]. J Reprod Immunol, 2017, 123:12-16.
[14]
Sites CK, Wilson D, Barsky M, et al. Embryo cryopreservation and preeclampsia risk [J]. Fertil Steril, 2017, 108(5): 784-790.
[15]
Gui J, Ling Z, Hou X, et al. In vitro fertilization is associated with the onset and progression of preeclampsia [J]. Placenta, 2020, 89:50-57.
[16]
Ananth CV. Ischemic placental disease: aunifying concept for preeclampsia, intrauterinegrowth restriction, and placental abruption [J]. Semin Perinatol, 2014,38(3):131-132.
[17]
Lisonkova S, Sabr Y, Mayer C, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 124(4): 771-781.
[18]
Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early-versus late-onset disease [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013,209(6): 544.e1-544.e12.
[1] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[6] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[7] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[8] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[9] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[10] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[11] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[12] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[13] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[14] 刘雪云, 范颖, 姚爱军, 张胜苗, 吕亚妮, 张冰清, 张晓宇, 刘恒. 基于微信小程序的个体化、全程护理干预对孕妇孕期体重及分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 455-460.
[15] 吴晓翔, 杨波, 李景漩, 张凤玲, 郭桂辉, 郑少培. 脐动脉超声检查联合NLR、sFlt-1/PLGF对妊娠高血压综合征患者不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
阅读次数
全文


摘要