切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 244 -248. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2023.04.012

论著

前次剖宫产时机对再次妊娠合并前置胎盘患者临床结局的影响
印贤琴, 刘宇茵, 毛丽丽, 孙雯, 陈敦金()   
  1. 510150 广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科 广州重症孕产妇救治中心 广东省产科重大疾病重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-01 出版日期:2023-11-18
  • 通信作者: 陈敦金
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划"生育健康及妇女儿童健康"重点专项项目(2022YFC2704500); 广州市科创委一般项目(202201010907); 广州市卫生和计划生育委员会一般引导项目(20231A011094)

Effect of timing of previous cesarean section on clinical outcomes of second pregnancy with placenta previa.

Xianqin Yin, Yuyin Liu, Lili Mao, Wen Sun, Dunjin Chen()   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical Center for Gitical Pregnant Women, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2023-09-01 Published:2023-11-18
  • Corresponding author: Dunjin Chen
引用本文:

印贤琴, 刘宇茵, 毛丽丽, 孙雯, 陈敦金. 前次剖宫产时机对再次妊娠合并前置胎盘患者临床结局的影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 244-248.

Xianqin Yin, Yuyin Liu, Lili Mao, Wen Sun, Dunjin Chen. Effect of timing of previous cesarean section on clinical outcomes of second pregnancy with placenta previa.[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(04): 244-248.

目的

探讨产程中转剖宫产及临产前择期剖宫产对再次妊娠合并前置胎盘患者临床结局的影响。

方法

回顾分析2016年10月至2021年10月在广州医科大学附属第三医院住院分娩的既往单次剖宫产史、本次妊娠诊断合并前置胎盘的658例单胎患者的临床资料,依据前次剖宫产时机将患者分为临产前择期剖宫产组(择期组,505例)及中转剖宫产组(中转组,153例),追溯前次剖宫产指征,比较两组患者的临床特征及本次妊娠结局。

结果

两组患者的年龄、体重指数、人工流产次数及生殖助孕率等差异无统计学意义;择期组与中转组比较,合并胎盘植入性疾病比例(69.9% vs 55.6%, χ2=10.858)、术中出血量(<1000 ml:57.6% vs 75.8%,1000~2000 ml:31.7% vs 20.3%,>2000 ml:10.7% vs 3.9%,χ2=17.466)、输注血制品量(>0且≤400 ml:10.1% vs 11.1%,>400且≤1200 ml:15.4% vs 11.1%,>1200 ml:12.3% vs 5.2%, χ2=9.083)、转重症监护病房比例(3.2% vs 0)、术后住院时长(5 d vs 4 d,Ζ=-2.528)、总住院时长(9 d vs 8 d,Ζ=-2.260)及足月分娩率(32.3% vs 45.1%,χ2=8.448),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

临产前择期剖宫产是再次妊娠发生前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的高危因素,其母儿不良结局发生率高。

Objective

To evaluate the effect of the timing of previous cesarean section on outcomes of subsequent pregnancy complicated with placenta previa.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. 658 women with placenta previa, who were all singleton pregnancies and had only one previous cesarean section, were analyzed in Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from October 2016 to October 2021. According to the timing of the previous cesarean section, the patients were divided into Elective cesarean (EC group) and Intrapartum cesarean (IC group). The two groups′ clinical characteristics and maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed.

Results

There were 505 cases in the EC group and 153 cases in the IC group. No significant differences were found in age, BMI, abortion frequency, reproductive-assisted pregnancy rate and distance from the previous cesarean section between the two groups. The rates of placenta accrete spectrum disorders (69.9% vs 55.6%, χ2=10.858), intraoperative hemorrhage volume (<1000ml: 57.6% vs 75.8%, 1000~2000 ml: 31.7% vs 20.3%, >2000 ml: 10.7% vs 3.9%, χ2=17.466), blood transfusion volume (>0 but ≤400 ml: 10.1% vs 11.1%, >400 but ≤1200 ml: 15.4% vs 11.1%, >1200 ml: 12.3% vs 5.2%, χ2=9.083), the rates of ICU occupancy (3.2% vs 0), postoperative hospitalization days (5 vs 4, Ζ=-2.528), total hospitalization days (9 vs 8, Ζ=-2.260) and the term delivery rate (32.3% vs 45.1%, χ2=8.448) between the EC group and the IC group were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Elective caesarean section before labor onset is a high-risk factor for placenta previa complicated with PAS in a subsequent pregnancy, and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes are higher.

表1 两组患者本次妊娠母体结局比较
表2 两组患者本次妊娠新生儿结局比较
[1]
Qiao J, Wang YY, Li XH, et al. A Lancet Commission on 70 years of women′s reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health in China[J]. Lancet2021397(10293):2497-2536.
[2]
Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, et al. WHO statement on caesarean section rates[J]. BJOG2016123(5):667-670.
[3]
Jauniaux E, Bhide A, Kennedy A, et al.FIGO placenta accreta diagnosis and management expert consensus panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: prenatal diagnosis and screening[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet2018140(3):274-280.
[4]
谢幸,孔北华,段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 9版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:148-149.
[5]
中华医学会围产医学分会,中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组.胎盘植入诊治指南(2015)[J/OL].中华产科急救电子杂志20165(1):26-31.
[6]
蔡建云,顾新安,王谨,等. 疤痕子宫合并中央性前置胎盘的围术期并发症[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究201829(3):349-352.
[7]
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus No. 7: placenta accreta spectrum[J].Obstetrics and Gynecology2018132(6):e259-275.
[8]
Thurn L, Lindqvist PG, Jakobsson M, et al. Abnormally invasive placenta prevalence, risk factors and antenatal suspicion: results from a large population based pregnancy cohort study in the Nordic countries[J]. BJOG2016123(8):1348-1355.
[9]
Rosenberg T, Pariente G, Sergienko R, et al. Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet2011284(1):47-51.
[10]
Bowman ZS, Eller AG, Bardsley TR, et al. Risk factors for placenta accreta: a large prospective cohort[J]. Am J Perinatol201431(9):799-804.
[11]
Carusi DAFox KALyell DJ,et al. Placenta accreta spectrum without placenta previa[J]. Obstet Gynecol2020136(3):458-465.
[12]
卞政,应豪. 预防初次剖宫产指南对促进阴道试产的作用[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志201733(6):571-575.
[13]
Brahmalakshmy BL, Kushtagi P. Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post cesarean pregnancy[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet2015291(4):755-762.
[14]
魏素梅,杨霄,金莹,等. 前次剖宫产手术对再次妊娠胎盘植入及其类型的影响[J]. 实用妇产科杂志201733(10):790-792.
[15]
Kamara MHenderson JJDoherty DA,et al.The risk of placenta accreta following primary elective caesarean delivery: a case-control study[J].BJOG2013120(7):879-886.
[16]
Shynlova O, Lee YH, Srikhajon K, et al. Physiologic uterine inflammation and labor onset: integration of endocrine and mechanical signals[J]. Reprod Sci201320(2):154-167.
[17]
侯磊,李光辉,邹丽颖,等. 全国剖宫产率及剖宫产指征构成比调查的多中心研究[J]. 中华妇产科杂志201449(10):728-735.
[1] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 范思涵, 叶彩玲, 纪学芹. 产前超声心动图在先天性血管环诊断中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 37-41.
[2] 何雪威, 谷美玉, 吴亭亭. 超声子宫动脉及子宫内膜血流参数对不明原因复发性流产患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1158-1163.
[3] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[4] 薛静, 孙雅楠, 朱丽丽, 李淑红. 妊娠期急性脂肪肝孕产妇诊疗及其妊娠结局[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 312-321.
[5] 陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[6] 贾赛君, 张英, 万佳义. 妊娠合并亚临床甲状腺功能减退孕妇的妊娠结局[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[7] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[8] 洪凡, 陈敦金, 傅洋, 梁新月, 吴毅, 王晓怡. 体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠合并前置胎盘临床研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 176-182.
[9] 胡淼, 杜丽丽, 张丽姿, 林琳, 张瑜亮, 古士锋, 古仲嘉, 赖思莹, 梁景英, 刘雨, 黄敏珊, 黄媛媛, 黄晴晴, 罗世君, 陈敦金. 体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射受孕患者胎盘植入分级及围产结局的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 183-189.
[10] 刘文易, 高晓彤, 汤景, 麦卓瑶, 祝丽琼, 陈慧. 体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠合并绒毛膜下血肿患者妊娠结局的临床研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 93-99.
[11] 李婷, 滕银成. 体外受精-胚胎移植与前置胎盘[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 84-87.
[12] 庄旭, 丁立, 许丽, 张宁, 张羽, 林建华. 慢性肾病孕妇肾脏超声异常与不良妊娠结局的相关性研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 100-105.
[13] 徐琦, 彭小芳, 杜涛, 王霞妹, 张蜀宁, 陈曼绮, 郭勤敏, 黄泽薇, 付帅. COL1A2基因变异致胎儿期及成年后成骨不全家系的相关研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 106-111.
[14] 王晓艳, 朱利平, 侯顺玉, 岳永飞. 椎管内分娩镇痛对B族溶血性链球菌阳性孕妇阴道分娩结局的影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 112-116.
[15] 刘光华, 欧阳强, 俞炬明, 范国平, 欧敬民, 邱明科, 林霏开, 孙会贞, 张惠, 汪希鹏, 金敏菲. 双侧髂内动脉球囊阻断序贯子宫动脉栓塞辅助下剖宫产的临床应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 33-38.
阅读次数
全文


摘要