切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (03) : 198 -201. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2013.03.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

前置胎盘附着位置对剖宫产后再次妊娠母婴结局的影响
陈汉青1, 邹粟花1, 杨建波1, 徐丽南1, 王子莲1,()   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-30 出版日期:2013-08-18
  • 通信作者: 王子莲

The effect of placenta position on re-pregnant women with placenta previa after cesarean section

Han-qing CHEN1, Su-hua ZOU1, Jian-bo YANG1, Li-nan XU1, Zi-lian WANG1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2013-06-30 Published:2013-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Zi-lian WANG
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: WANG Zi-lian, Email:
引用本文:

陈汉青, 邹粟花, 杨建波, 徐丽南, 王子莲. 前置胎盘附着位置对剖宫产后再次妊娠母婴结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2013, 02(03): 198-201.

Han-qing CHEN, Su-hua ZOU, Jian-bo YANG, Li-nan XU, Zi-lian WANG. The effect of placenta position on re-pregnant women with placenta previa after cesarean section[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2013, 02(03): 198-201.

目的

研究前置胎盘附着位置对剖宫产后再次妊娠母婴结局的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2008年6月至2013年6月就诊于中山大学附属第一医院产科剖宫产后再次妊娠合并前置胎盘62例患者临床资料,其中附着于子宫前壁的前置胎盘33例(前壁组),附着于子宫后壁的前置胎盘29例(后壁组),比较两组患者的一般情况、前置胎盘类型、并发症、妊娠结局及新生儿情况。计量资料采用t检验,计数资料采用χ2检验。

结果

前壁组与后壁组患者的产前出血率分别为45.5%和17.2%(χ2=4.554,P=0.033),产后出血发生率分别为69.7%和13.8%(χ2=17.348,P<0.001),胎盘粘连发生率分别为48.5%和20.7%(χ2=4.151,P=0.042),胎盘植入发生率分别为33.3%和10.3%(χ2=4.028,P=0.045),子宫切除率分别为27.3%及0.0%(χ2=8.434,P=0.004),弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)发生率分别为27.3%和0.0%(χ2=8.434,P=0.004),早产发生率分别为63.6%和27.6%(χ2=4.464,P=0.035)。

结论

剖宫产后再次妊娠合并前置胎盘中,胎盘附着于前壁者导致产前出血、产后出血、胎盘粘连、胎盘植入、子宫切除、DIC及早产的风险显著增高,分娩前应明确胎盘附着位置。

Objective

To explore the effect of the placenta position on re-pregnant women with placenta previa after cesarean section.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in 62 re-pregnant women with placenta previa after cesarean section. The patients were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from June 2008 to June 2013. They were divided into anterior group (33 cases) and posterior group (29 cases). The patients with placenta implanted the front wall of the uterus were in the anterior group; while the others with placenta implanted the back wall of the uterus were in the posterior group. General condition, placenta position, complication, pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes were analyzed using t test or Chi-square test.

Results

The rate of antepartum hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage, placenta adherence, placenta accrete, hysterectomy, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and premature birth of the two groups were 45.5% and 17.2%(χ2=4.554, P=0.033), 69.7% and 13.8%(χ2=17.348, P<0.001), 48.5% and 20.7%(χ2=4.151, P=0.042), 33.3% and 10.3%(χ2=4.028, P=0.045), 27.3% and 0.0%(χ2=8.434, P=0.004), 27.3% and 0.0%(χ2=8.434, P=0.004), 63.6% and 27.6%(χ2=4.464, P=0.035), respectively. But there were no significant differences on neonatal outcomes in the two groups.

Conclusions

The re-pregnant women, who had history of cesarean section, with placenta previa and placenta implanted the front wall of uterus were at more risk of antepartum hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage, placenta adherence, placenta accrete, hysterectomy, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and premature birth. It is necessary to diagnose placenta position before delivery.

表1 两组患者一般情况比较
表2 两组患者前置胎盘类型比较
表3 两组患者的并发症及妊娠结局比较
表4 两组患者新生儿情况的比较
[1]
Chamberlain G, Steer P. Obstetric emergencies. BMJ, 1999, 318(7194):1342-1345.
[2]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 前置胎盘的临床诊断与处理指南. 中华妇产科杂志,2013, 48(2):148-150.
[3]
Kistner RW, Hertig AT, Reid DE. Simultaneously occurring placenta previa and placenta accreta. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1952, 94(2): 141-151.
[4]
Render S. Placenta previa and previous lower segment cesarean section. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1954, 98(5): 625-628.
[5]
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee opinion. Number 266, January 2002 : placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 99(1):169-170.
[6]
Nieminen K, Stephansson O, Ryding EL. Women′s fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section-a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2009, 88(7): 807-813.
[7]
Gasim T, Al Jama FE, Rahman MS, et al. Multiple repeat cesarean sections: operative difficulties, maternal complications and outcome.J Reprod Med, 2013, 58(7-8):312-318.
[8]
Chattopadhyay SK, Khariff H, Sherbeeni MM. Placenta previa and accreta after previous cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1993, 52(3):151-156.
[9]
Aggarwal R, Suneja A, Vaid NB, et al. Morbidly adherent placenta: a critical review. J Obstet Gynaecol India, 2012, 62(1):57-61.
[10]
Suknikhom W, Tannirandorn Y. Previous uterine operation and placenta previa. J Med Assoc Thai, 2011, 94(3):272-277.
[11]
Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, et al. Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study. PLoS One, 2012, 7(12):e52893.
[12]
Ayaz A, Farooq MU. Risk of adverse maternal and peri-natal outcome in subjects with placenta previa with previous cesarean section. Kurume Med J, 2012, 59(1-2):1-4.
[13]
Getahun D, Oyelese Y, Salihu HM, et al. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 107(4):771-778.
[14]
Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 205(3):262.e1-e8.
[15]
Kamara M, Henderson JJ, Doherty DA, et al. The risk of placenta accreta following primary elective caesarean delivery: a case-control study. BJOG, 2013, 120(7):879-886.
[16]
Daltveit AK, Tollånes MC, Pihlstrøm H, et al. Cesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancies. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008, 111(6):1327-1334.
[1] 杜佳丽, 鲍睿, 乔春红, 韩伟. 中孕期宫颈功能不全孕妇经阴道紧急宫颈环扎术后不良妊娠结局预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 403-409.
[2] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[3] 薛静, 孙雅楠, 朱丽丽, 李淑红. 妊娠期急性脂肪肝孕产妇诊疗及其妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 312-321.
[4] 陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[5] 贾赛君, 张英, 万佳义. 妊娠合并亚临床甲状腺功能减退孕妇的妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[6] 鲁珊, 姚蕴珊, 廖色坭, 陈子恩, 张一剑, 蓝健皓, 魏薇, 刘艳杨, 陈艳红, 陈敦金. 妊娠合并急性阑尾炎100例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
[7] 汪文雁, 郑剑兰, 朱丽慈. 体外受精-胚胎移植术后妊娠患者孕产期风险的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 220-226.
[8] 俞慧慧, 尹宗智. 妊娠期胃穿孔[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 209-213.
[9] 洪凡, 陈敦金, 傅洋, 梁新月, 吴毅, 王晓怡. 体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠合并前置胎盘临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 176-182.
[10] 胡淼, 杜丽丽, 张丽姿, 林琳, 张瑜亮, 古士锋, 古仲嘉, 赖思莹, 梁景英, 刘雨, 黄敏珊, 黄媛媛, 黄晴晴, 罗世君, 陈敦金. 体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射受孕患者胎盘植入分级及围产结局的研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 183-189.
[11] 庄旭, 丁立, 许丽, 张宁, 张羽, 林建华. 慢性肾病孕妇肾脏超声异常与不良妊娠结局的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 100-105.
[12] 徐琦, 彭小芳, 杜涛, 王霞妹, 张蜀宁, 陈曼绮, 郭勤敏, 黄泽薇, 付帅. COL1A2基因变异致胎儿期及成年后成骨不全家系的相关研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 106-111.
[13] 王晓艳, 朱利平, 侯顺玉, 岳永飞. 椎管内分娩镇痛对B族溶血性链球菌阳性孕妇阴道分娩结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 112-116.
[14] 李婷, 滕银成. 体外受精-胚胎移植与前置胎盘[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 84-87.
[15] 刘文易, 高晓彤, 汤景, 麦卓瑶, 祝丽琼, 陈慧. 体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠合并绒毛膜下血肿患者妊娠结局的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 93-99.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?