切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (03) : 198 -201. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2013.03.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

前置胎盘附着位置对剖宫产后再次妊娠母婴结局的影响
陈汉青1, 邹粟花1, 杨建波1, 徐丽南1, 王子莲1,()   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-30 出版日期:2013-08-18
  • 通信作者: 王子莲

The effect of placenta position on re-pregnant women with placenta previa after cesarean section

Han-qing CHEN1, Su-hua ZOU1, Jian-bo YANG1, Li-nan XU1, Zi-lian WANG1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2013-06-30 Published:2013-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Zi-lian WANG
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: WANG Zi-lian, Email:
引用本文:

陈汉青, 邹粟花, 杨建波, 徐丽南, 王子莲. 前置胎盘附着位置对剖宫产后再次妊娠母婴结局的影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2013, 02(03): 198-201.

Han-qing CHEN, Su-hua ZOU, Jian-bo YANG, Li-nan XU, Zi-lian WANG. The effect of placenta position on re-pregnant women with placenta previa after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2013, 02(03): 198-201.

目的

研究前置胎盘附着位置对剖宫产后再次妊娠母婴结局的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2008年6月至2013年6月就诊于中山大学附属第一医院产科剖宫产后再次妊娠合并前置胎盘62例患者临床资料,其中附着于子宫前壁的前置胎盘33例(前壁组),附着于子宫后壁的前置胎盘29例(后壁组),比较两组患者的一般情况、前置胎盘类型、并发症、妊娠结局及新生儿情况。计量资料采用t检验,计数资料采用χ2检验。

结果

前壁组与后壁组患者的产前出血率分别为45.5%和17.2%(χ2=4.554,P=0.033),产后出血发生率分别为69.7%和13.8%(χ2=17.348,P<0.001),胎盘粘连发生率分别为48.5%和20.7%(χ2=4.151,P=0.042),胎盘植入发生率分别为33.3%和10.3%(χ2=4.028,P=0.045),子宫切除率分别为27.3%及0.0%(χ2=8.434,P=0.004),弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)发生率分别为27.3%和0.0%(χ2=8.434,P=0.004),早产发生率分别为63.6%和27.6%(χ2=4.464,P=0.035)。

结论

剖宫产后再次妊娠合并前置胎盘中,胎盘附着于前壁者导致产前出血、产后出血、胎盘粘连、胎盘植入、子宫切除、DIC及早产的风险显著增高,分娩前应明确胎盘附着位置。

Objective

To explore the effect of the placenta position on re-pregnant women with placenta previa after cesarean section.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in 62 re-pregnant women with placenta previa after cesarean section. The patients were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from June 2008 to June 2013. They were divided into anterior group (33 cases) and posterior group (29 cases). The patients with placenta implanted the front wall of the uterus were in the anterior group; while the others with placenta implanted the back wall of the uterus were in the posterior group. General condition, placenta position, complication, pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes were analyzed using t test or Chi-square test.

Results

The rate of antepartum hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage, placenta adherence, placenta accrete, hysterectomy, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and premature birth of the two groups were 45.5% and 17.2%(χ2=4.554, P=0.033), 69.7% and 13.8%(χ2=17.348, P<0.001), 48.5% and 20.7%(χ2=4.151, P=0.042), 33.3% and 10.3%(χ2=4.028, P=0.045), 27.3% and 0.0%(χ2=8.434, P=0.004), 27.3% and 0.0%(χ2=8.434, P=0.004), 63.6% and 27.6%(χ2=4.464, P=0.035), respectively. But there were no significant differences on neonatal outcomes in the two groups.

Conclusions

The re-pregnant women, who had history of cesarean section, with placenta previa and placenta implanted the front wall of uterus were at more risk of antepartum hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage, placenta adherence, placenta accrete, hysterectomy, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and premature birth. It is necessary to diagnose placenta position before delivery.

表1 两组患者一般情况比较
表2 两组患者前置胎盘类型比较
表3 两组患者的并发症及妊娠结局比较
表4 两组患者新生儿情况的比较
[1]
Chamberlain G, Steer P. Obstetric emergencies. BMJ, 1999, 318(7194):1342-1345.
[2]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 前置胎盘的临床诊断与处理指南. 中华妇产科杂志,2013, 48(2):148-150.
[3]
Kistner RW, Hertig AT, Reid DE. Simultaneously occurring placenta previa and placenta accreta. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1952, 94(2): 141-151.
[4]
Render S. Placenta previa and previous lower segment cesarean section. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1954, 98(5): 625-628.
[5]
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee opinion. Number 266, January 2002 : placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 99(1):169-170.
[6]
Nieminen K, Stephansson O, Ryding EL. Women′s fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section-a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2009, 88(7): 807-813.
[7]
Gasim T, Al Jama FE, Rahman MS, et al. Multiple repeat cesarean sections: operative difficulties, maternal complications and outcome.J Reprod Med, 2013, 58(7-8):312-318.
[8]
Chattopadhyay SK, Khariff H, Sherbeeni MM. Placenta previa and accreta after previous cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1993, 52(3):151-156.
[9]
Aggarwal R, Suneja A, Vaid NB, et al. Morbidly adherent placenta: a critical review. J Obstet Gynaecol India, 2012, 62(1):57-61.
[10]
Suknikhom W, Tannirandorn Y. Previous uterine operation and placenta previa. J Med Assoc Thai, 2011, 94(3):272-277.
[11]
Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, et al. Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study. PLoS One, 2012, 7(12):e52893.
[12]
Ayaz A, Farooq MU. Risk of adverse maternal and peri-natal outcome in subjects with placenta previa with previous cesarean section. Kurume Med J, 2012, 59(1-2):1-4.
[13]
Getahun D, Oyelese Y, Salihu HM, et al. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 107(4):771-778.
[14]
Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 205(3):262.e1-e8.
[15]
Kamara M, Henderson JJ, Doherty DA, et al. The risk of placenta accreta following primary elective caesarean delivery: a case-control study. BJOG, 2013, 120(7):879-886.
[16]
Daltveit AK, Tollånes MC, Pihlstrøm H, et al. Cesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancies. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008, 111(6):1327-1334.
[1] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[2] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[3] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[4] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[5] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[7] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[8] 冯丹艳, 曹晓辉, 史玉霞. 血清脂联素与胎盘亮氨酸氨肽酶对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[9] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[10] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[11] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[12] 吴晓翔, 杨波, 李景漩, 张凤玲, 郭桂辉, 郑少培. 脐动脉超声检查联合NLR、sFlt-1/PLGF对妊娠高血压综合征患者不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[13] 张丽姿, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的不良结局及远期影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
[14] 岳永飞, 朱利平, 王晓艳. 磁共振成像技术在预测胎盘植入性疾病患者剖宫产术中出血量的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 167-172.
[15] 向雷, 杨琪, 谢辉, 刘海涛, 夏风, 兰为顺, 杨文忠. 非顺应性腹主动脉球囊阻断术在凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入剖宫产中的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 106-112.
阅读次数
全文


摘要