| [1] |
Harper JC, Harper JC, Delhanty JDA, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis [M]. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2001: 3-12.
|
| [2] |
Chang L, Boulet SL, Jeng G, et al. Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011－2012 [J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 105(2): 394-400.
|
| [3] |
Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Freidine M, et al. Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in-situ hybridization [J]. Hum Reprod, 1995, 10(7): 1923-1927.
|
| [4] |
Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care [J]. Hum Report, 2017, 32(9): 1786-1801.
|
| [5] |
王珺，苟兴庆，李丽，等. 高龄患者行胚胎植入前遗传学筛查的有效性分析[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志，2018, 26(8): 121-124.
|
| [6] |
Cao H, You D, Yuan M, et al. Hysterosocopy after repeated implantation failure of assisted reproductive technology: A meta-analysis [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2018, 1(2):19.
|
| [7] |
Valdes CT, Schutt A, Simon C, et al. Implantation failure of endometria origin: it is not pathology, but our failure to synchronize the developing embryo with a receptive endometrium [J]. Fertil Steril, 2017, 108(1): 15-18.
|
| [8] |
Kushnir VA, Darmon SK, Barad DH, et al. Degree of mosaicism in trophectoderm does not predict pregnancy potential: a corrected analysis of pregnancy outcomes following transfer of mosaic embryos [J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2018, 16: 6.
|
| [9] |
Spinella F, Fliorentino F, Biricik A, et al. Extent of chromosomal mosaicism influences the clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization treatments [J]. Fertil Steril, 2018, 109(1): 77-83.
|
| [10] |
Victor AR, Griffin DK, Brake AJ, et al. Assessment of aneuploidy concordance between clinical trophectoderm biopsy and blastocyst [J]. Hum Reprod, 2019, 34(1): 181-192.
|
| [11] |
Scott RT Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, et al. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized andpaired clinical trial [J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 100(3): 624-630.
|
| [12] |
Verpoest W, Staessen C, Bossuyt PM, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by microarray analysis of polar bodies in advanced maternal age: a randomized clinical trial [J]. Hum Reprod, 2018, 33(9): 1767-1776.
|
| [13] |
Minasi MG, Fiorentino F, Ruberti A, et al. Genetic diseases and aneuploidies can be detected with a single blastocyst biopsy: a successful clinical approach [J]. Hum Reprod, 2017, 32(8): 1770-1777.
|
| [14] |
Jasper M, Brockman M, Hodgson B, et al. Combined PGD and PGS by NGS on the same biopsy using a single index [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2018, 36, 16-17.
|
| [15] |
Reignier A, Lammers J, Barriere P, et al. Can time-lapse parameters predict embryo ploidy? A systematic review [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2018, 36: 380-387.
|
| [16] |
Pribenszky C, Nilselid AM, Montag M. Time-lapse culture with morphokinetic embryo selection improves pregnancy and live birth chances and reduces early pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2017, 35: 511-520.
|
| [17] |
Vera-Rodriguez M, Diez-Juan A, Jimenez-Almazan J, et al. Origin and composition of cell-free DNA in spent medium from human embryo culture during preimplantation development [J]. Hum Reprod, 2018, 33(4): 745-756.
|
| [18] |
Farra C, Choucair F, Awwad J. Non-invasive pre-implantation genetic testing of human embryos: an emerging concept [J]. Human Reproduction, 2018, 33(12): 2162-2167.
|
| [19] |
Gleicher N, Orvieto R. Is the hypothesis of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still supportable? A review [J]. J Ovarian Res, 2017, 10(1): 21.
|
| [20] |
Brezina PR, Anchan R, Kearns WG. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: what technology should you use and what are the differences? [J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2016, 33(7): 823-832.
|
| [21] |
曹云霞，郝燕，杨芳. 植入前遗传学诊断技术产生的社会伦理问题及其监管对策[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志，2018, 38(8): 657-661.
|