切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (04) : 241 -246. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2019.04.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

凶险性前置胎盘伴宫颈植入的诊断与治疗
郑九生1,(), 辛思明1, 刘凌芝1, 廖宗高1   
  1. 1. 330006 南昌,江西省妇幼保健院产科
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-13 出版日期:2019-11-18
  • 通信作者: 郑九生
  • 基金资助:
    江西省科技厅科技计划项目(20151BBG70098)

Diagnosis and treatment of pernicious placenta previa with cervical accretion

Jiusheng Zheng1,(), Siming Xin1, Lingzhi Liu1, Zonggao Liao1   

  1. 1. Department of Obsterics, Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanchang 330006, China
  • Received:2019-05-13 Published:2019-11-18
  • Corresponding author: Jiusheng Zheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zheng Jiusheng, Email:
引用本文:

郑九生, 辛思明, 刘凌芝, 廖宗高. 凶险性前置胎盘伴宫颈植入的诊断与治疗[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2019, 08(04): 241-246.

Jiusheng Zheng, Siming Xin, Lingzhi Liu, Zonggao Liao. Diagnosis and treatment of pernicious placenta previa with cervical accretion[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(04): 241-246.

目的

探讨凶险性前置胎盘伴宫颈植入的诊治方法。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2019年1月江西省妇幼保健院收治的凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入96例患者的临床资料,其中32例伴宫颈植入(宫颈植入组),64例伴子宫下段植入(子宫下段植入组),比较2组病例术中出血量、输血量、术后血红蛋白水平、手术止血方法、术后并发症等。

结果

(1)宫颈植入组术中出血量2000~2975 ml,平均2500 ml,显著高于子宫下段植入组(1000~1500 ml,平均1200 ml), (Z=-6.634,P=0.001);输红细胞悬液、血浆、血小板及冷沉淀的量亦显著多于子宫下段植入组,P均<0.05;(2)子宫下段植入组中57例(89.06%)采取子宫血管结扎进行止血,高于宫颈植入组20例(62.5%), χ2=9.48,P<0.05;宫颈植入组宫颈环形缝合术28.13%(9/32)和子宫切除率达34.38%(11/32),高于子宫下段植入组的9.38%(6/64)和1.56%(1/64), χ2=5.69和18.11,P<0.05;(3)宫颈植入组失血性休克及膀胱损伤的发生率分别为56.25%(18/32)、15.63%(5/32),高于子宫下段植入组的14.06%(9/64)、1.56%(1/64),P<0.05。

结论

凶险性前置胎盘伴宫颈植入患者病情更凶险;对宫颈植入患者术前应准确评估病情程度,术中选择合适的止血措施,控制其出血量,在保障孕产妇安全的前提下,降低子宫切除率。

Objective

To investigate the diagnosis and the treatment of pernicious placenta previa with cervical accretion to improve the outcome of pregnancy.

Methods

Retrospectively analyzed 96 cases of pernicious preplacental placenta with placental accretion treated in Jiangxi Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from January 2017 to January 2019. Thirty-two cases with cervical implantation were in the cervical implantation group, 64 cases with lower uterine implantation were in the lower uterine implantation group. The bleeding volume, blood transfusion volume, postoperative hemoglobin level, hemostatic method and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

(1) The amount of bleeding in the cervical implantation group was 2000-2975 ml, with an average of 2500 ml, which was significantly higher than that in the lower uterine implantation group (1000-1500 ml, with an average of 1200 ml), (Z=-6.634, P=0.001); The amount of red blood cell suspension, plasma, platelets and cryoprecipitate were also significantly higher than that of the lower uterine implantation group (P<0.05). (2) Fifty-seven cases (89.06%) in the lower uterine segment implantation group were treated with uterine vascular ligation for hemostasis, which was higher than 20 cases (62.5%) in the cervical implantation group ( χ2=9.48, P<0.05). In the cervical implantation group, the rates of cervical circular suture and hysterectomy were 28.13% (9/32) and 34.38% (11/32), respectively, which were higher than those in the lower uterine implantation group, 9.38% (6/64) and 1.56% (1/64), χ2=5.69 and 18.11, P<0.05. (3) The incidence of hemorrhagic shock and bladder injury were 56.25% (18/32) and 15.63% (5/32) in cervical implantation group, respectively, which were higher than that of 14.06% (9/64) and 1.56% (1/64) in the lower uterine implantation group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The condition of the patients with pernicious placenta previa complicated with cervical implantation is more dangerous. It is important to accurately evaluate the severity of the pregnant women with placenta previa before the operation, choose appropriate hemostatic measures to control hemorrhage in operation and minimize hysterectomy based on the safety of pregnant women.

表1 两组患者一般资料的比较
表2 两组患者术中出血量、术后血红蛋白水平比较
表3 两组患者输血量的比较
表4 两组患者术中止血方法比较[例数(%)]
表5 两组患者术后并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
表6 两组患者新生儿情况比较
[1]
Silver RM. Abnormal placentation:placenta previa, vasa previa and placenta [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 126(3): 654-668.
[2]
中华医学会妇产科分会产科学组. 胎盘植入诊治指南(2015)[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2015, 18(7): 481-485.
[3]
Jauniaux E, Bhide A.Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Obstet and Gynecol, 2017, 217(1): 27-36.
[4]
杨静,赵扬玉. 凶险性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的影像学诊断研究进展[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2017, 33(9): 643-646.
[5]
姚尚龙. 凶险性前置胎盘大出血的容量治疗策略[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2017, 33(9): 652-654.
[6]
何淑凤,邹金芳. 70例凶险性前置胎盘伴或不伴胎盘植入妊娠结局的分析[J]. 安徽医药,2017, 21(11): 2029-2031.
[7]
李明,杜菲,滕银成,等. 凶险性前置胎盘的妊娠结局及其与产后出血的高危因素分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2017, 33(10): 755-759.
[8]
郑九生,刘淮,辛思明,等. 凶险性前置胎盘临床分级诊断探讨[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2014, 29(33): 5374-5376.
[9]
王珣,李家福. 宫颈提拉缝合联合宫颈环扎在顽固性出血的凶险前置胎盘手术中的应用[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2018, 34(2): 152-153.
[10]
D′ Antonio F, Iacovella C, Salacious-Jaraquemada J, et al.Prenatal i-dentification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance ima- ging: Systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 44(1): 8-16.
[11]
Ueno Y, Maeda T, Tanaka U, et al. Evaluation of interobserver varia-bility and diagnostic performance of developed MRI-based radiological scoring system for invasive placenta previa [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 44(3):573-583.
[12]
Dedes I, Ziogas V. Circular isthmic-cervical sutures can be an alternative method to control peripartum haemorrhage during caesarean section for placenta praevia accrete [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2008, 278(6): 555-557.
[13]
刘凌芝,郑九生,辛思明,等. 侧入逆行向上分离膀胱法在凶险型前置胎盘剖宫产术中的应用研究[J]. 现代妇产科进展,2015, 24(2): 126-127.
[14]
Ying H, Duan T, Bao YR, et al. Transverse annular compression sutures in the lower uterine segment to control postpartum hemorrhage at cesarean delivery for complete placenta previa [J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2010, 108(3): 247-248.
[15]
杨慧霞,余琳,时春艳,等. 止血带捆绑下子宫下段环形蝶式缝扎术治疗凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入的效果[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2015, 18(7):497-501.
[16]
邓黎,常青. 宫颈提拉式缝合在前置胎盘剖宫产术宫颈管出血中应用效果观察[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2014, 30(4): 281-283.
[17]
王振辉. 截断性子宫动脉上行支结扎加宫颈提拉式缝合在前置胎盘剖宫产术中宫颈管顽固性出血的应用[J]. 医学临床研究,2017, 34(2): 395-397.
[18]
彭珠芸,俞丽丽,韩健,等. 子宫下段环形缝扎术治疗前置胎盘致剖宫产后出血[J]. 局部手术学杂志,2014, 23(1): 9-11.
[1] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[2] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[3] 唐䶮, 唐卉, 陈悦, 李慕军. 前置胎盘剖宫产改良术式预防产后出血的探讨[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 436-441.
[4] 王永, 李霞林, 杨蓉, 潘康妮, 余琳, 王伟伟, 孙雯, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入合并严重产后出血输血方案的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 173-179.
[5] 岳永飞, 朱利平, 王晓艳. 磁共振成像技术在预测胎盘植入性疾病患者剖宫产术中出血量的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 167-172.
[6] 赵先兰, 周艳. 胎盘植入性疾病出血血管介入治疗策略[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 147-150.
[7] 毛丽丽, 林琳, 印贤琴, 孙雯, 余琳, 苏春宏. 前置胎盘合并胎盘植入患者子宫切除影响因素的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 93-97.
[8] 肖美群, 朱薇, 符华影. 产后急性子宫内翻四例临床分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 113-117.
[9] 温洁, 陈丹青. 妊娠合并缺铁性贫血与产后出血的管理[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2022, 11(04): 217-221.
[10] 黄畅晓, 李力. 预防产后出血关口前移的策略[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2022, 11(04): 198-201.
[11] 史梦丹, 周容. 产后出血高危因素的流行病学进展[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 140-143.
[12] 董欣, 李雪兰. 产后出血的早期识别及诊断[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 144-147.
[13] 李亚楠, 马玉燕. 产后出血时血液系统的变化及处理[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 148-151.
[14] 向雷, 杨琪, 谢辉, 刘海涛, 夏风, 兰为顺, 杨文忠. 非顺应性腹主动脉球囊阻断术在凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入剖宫产中的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 106-112.
[15] 周玉兰, 张晶晶, 刘丽. 髂内动脉球囊阻断应用于凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产术的围手术期护理[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 339-342.
阅读次数
全文


摘要