切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华产科急救电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 93 -97. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2023.02.006

论著

前置胎盘合并胎盘植入患者子宫切除影响因素的研究
毛丽丽, 林琳, 印贤琴, 孙雯, 余琳, 苏春宏()   
  1. 510150 广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科 广州重症孕产妇救治中心 广东省产科重大疾病重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-03 出版日期:2023-05-18
  • 通信作者: 苏春宏
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划"生育健康及妇女儿童健康保障"重点专项项目(2022YFC2704500); 广州市临床高新技术项目(2019GX03); 广州科创委一般项目(202201010907); 广州市卫生和计划生育委员会一般引导项目(20231A011094)

Analysis of influencing factors of hysterectomy in patients with placenta previa combined with placenta accrete

Lili Mao, Lin Lin, Xianqin Yin, Wen Sun, Lin Yu, Chunhong Su()   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory for Mayor Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou Medical Center for Critical Pregnant Women, Guangzhou 510150, China
  • Received:2022-05-03 Published:2023-05-18
  • Corresponding author: Chunhong Su
引用本文:

毛丽丽, 林琳, 印贤琴, 孙雯, 余琳, 苏春宏. 前置胎盘合并胎盘植入患者子宫切除影响因素的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 93-97.

Lili Mao, Lin Lin, Xianqin Yin, Wen Sun, Lin Yu, Chunhong Su. Analysis of influencing factors of hysterectomy in patients with placenta previa combined with placenta accrete[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(02): 93-97.

目的

探讨前置胎盘合并胎盘植入患者子宫切除的相关影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2021年10月广州医科大学附属第三医院收治孕28周以后分娩的前置胎盘合并胎盘植入444例患者的临床资料,子宫切除患者为研究组(152例,34.2%),无子宫切除患者为对照组(292例,65.8%)。对两组患者的一般情况、既往剖宫产相关因素和手术相关因素等行单因素分析,并采用Logistic回归行多因素分析。

结果

两组患者产次(≤1次:69.18% vs 43.42%; 2次:27.40% vs 46.71%; ≥3次:3.42% vs 9.87%; χ2=29.323)、有前置胎盘病史(3.42% vs 9.87%, χ2=7.757)、既往剖宫产次数(0次:23.63% vs 7.24%; 1次:56.85% vs 47.37%;≥2次:19.52% vs 45.39%; χ2=40.168)、术中失血量(900 ml vs 1500 ml; Z=-8.164)、胎盘植入程度(粘连:82.19% vs 34.87%;植入:13.36% vs 23.03%;穿透:4.45% vs 42.11%; χ2=121.255)、首次诊断胎盘植入孕周(<12周:0.34% vs 5.26%; 12~27+6周:29.11% vs 55.92%; ≥26周:70.55% vs 38.82%; χ2=47.637)的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析示,产次、胎盘植入程度、术中出血量及首次诊断胎盘植入孕周是前置胎盘合并胎盘植入子宫切除的独立危险因素。

结论

产次、胎盘植入程度、术中出血量及首次诊断胎盘植入孕周是前置胎盘合并胎盘植入子宫切除的独立危险因素。越早诊断胎盘植入,随产次增多、胎盘植入程度加重,子宫切除的风险明显增加,重视此类患者的产前保健、术前风险评估,对减少子宫切除风险至关重要。

Objective

To investigate the related factors of hysterectomy in patients with placenta previa combined with placenta accrete.

Methods

From January 2017 to October 2021, the clinical data of 444 patients with placenta previa combined with placenta accrete who delivered after the 28th week of pregnancy in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 152 patients (34.2%) had a hysterectomy as the research group, and 292 patients (65.8%) had no hysterectomy as the control group. Univariate analysis was performed on the general situation, factors related to the previous cesarean section, and factors related to operation in the two groups, and multivariate analysis was performed by Logistic regression.

Results

There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in pregnancy times (≤1次: 69.18% vs 43.42%; 2次: 27.40% vs 46.71%; ≥3次: 3.42% vs 9.87%; χ2=29.323), history of placenta previa (3.42% vs 9.87%, χ2=7.757), previous cesarean section times (0次: 23.63% vs 7.24%; 1次: 56.85% vs 47.37%; ≥2次: 19.52% vs 45.39%; χ2=40.168), gestational age of first diagnosis of placenta previa (<12 weeks: 0.34% vs 5.26%; 12~27+ 6 weeks: 29.11% vs 55.92%; ≥26 weeks: 70.55% vs 38.82%; χ2=47.637), intraoperative blood loss (900 ml vs 1500 ml; Z=-8.164), placenta implantation degree (adhesions: 82.19% vs 34.87%; implantation: 13.36% vs 23.03%; penetration: 4.45% vs 42.11%; χ2=121.255)(P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that parity, degree of placenta accreta, intraoperative blood loss and gestational age of first diagnosis of placenta accreta were independent risk factors for placenta previa combined with placenta accrete hysterectomy.

Conclusions

The parity, the degree of placenta accreta, the amount of intraoperative blood loss and the gestational age of the first diagnosis of placenta accreta are independent risk factors for placenta previa combined with placenta accrete hysterectomy. The earlier the diagnosis of placenta accreta, the higher the parity and the degree of placenta accreta, and the greater the risk of hysterectomy. Paying attention to prenatal care and preoperative risk assessment of such patients are essential to reduce hysterectomy.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
表2 两组患者既往剖宫产相关资料比较[例数(%)]
表3 两组患者此次妊娠相关资料比较[例数(%)]
表4 两组患者手术相关资料比较
表5 前置胎盘合并胎盘植入患者子宫切除多因素Logistic回归分析结果
[1]
张丽姿,毕石磊,陈敦金,等. 前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的认识及处理[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志202036(2):107-110.
[2]
D′Arpe S, Franceschetti S, Corosu R, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary teaching hospital: a 14-year review[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet2015291(4):841-847.
[3]
郑蔚然,杨馨蕊,闫婕,等. 结合国际指南,探究胎盘植入性疾病诊治进展[J]. 中华围产医学杂志202023(12):843-848.
[4]
Jauniaux E, Bhide A, Kennedy A, et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: prenatal diagnosis and screening[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2018140(3):274-280.
[5]
吕斌,陈锰,刘兴会. 前置胎盘孕妇围产期行子宫切除术的危险因素分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志201651(7):498-502.
[6]
杨丽娜,张地,耿力. 凶险性前置胎盘子宫切除的影响因素分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志202137(9):710-712.
[7]
Bowman ZS, Eller AG, Bardsley TR, et al. Risk factors for placenta accreta: a large prospective cohort[J]. Am J Perinatol201431(9):799-804.
[8]
柴国路,许培,陈兢思,等. 胎盘植入性疾病的危险因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志20209(1):49-53.
[9]
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol201444(3):346-353.
[1] 周灿坤, 李庆东, 江卓飞, 肇丽杰, 郑玉华, 柳晓春, 谢庆煌, 黄晓斌. 阴式广泛联合经阴道内镜腹膜外淋巴结切除术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 368-371.
[2] 苏梦婵, 郑莹, 王乔, 陈宇, 李帽俊, 杨帆. 国产单孔机器人经脐全子宫切除术:如何避免辅助孔[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(05): 307-310.
[3] 孙凤兰, 周萍, 程兴璞, 张倩倩. 腹腔镜全子宫切除术对子宫肌瘤患者机体氧化应激损伤及术后并发症的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 149-153.
[4] 唐䶮, 唐卉, 陈悦, 李慕军. 前置胎盘剖宫产改良术式预防产后出血的探讨[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 436-441.
[5] 中国医师协会妇产科分会母胎医学专委会, 中华医学会围产医学分会重症学组. 预防性介入治疗在胎盘植入性疾病的应用专家共识(2023)[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 133-140.
[6] 赵先兰, 周艳. 胎盘植入性疾病出血血管介入治疗策略[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 147-150.
[7] 陆晓勤, 刘先保, 龙尚乾, 宋可欣, 邓艳红, 张春芳. 不同程度胎盘植入患者剖宫产的麻醉决策及母婴结局[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 187-192.
[8] 吴文诗, 魏宋荃, 李桂民, 郑晓芳, 孙雯, 陈敦金, 余琳. 胎盘植入性疾病患者行子宫部分切除术后再次妊娠的临床研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 180-186.
[9] 王永, 李霞林, 杨蓉, 潘康妮, 余琳, 王伟伟, 孙雯, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入合并严重产后出血输血方案的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 173-179.
[10] 岳永飞, 朱利平, 王晓艳. 磁共振成像技术在预测胎盘植入性疾病患者剖宫产术中出血量的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 167-172.
[11] 古士锋, 张丽姿, 梁景英, 杜丽丽, 孙雯, 陈敦金. 2011-2021年我国胎盘植入性疾病研究热点:基于CiteSpace可视化分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 159-166.
[12] 张丽姿, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的不良结局及远期影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
[13] 郭志荣, 马京梅. 胎盘植入性疾病的风险评估和治疗策略[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 151-154.
[14] 向雷, 杨琪, 谢辉, 刘海涛, 夏风, 兰为顺, 杨文忠. 非顺应性腹主动脉球囊阻断术在凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入剖宫产中的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 106-112.
[15] 周玉兰, 张晶晶, 刘丽. 髂内动脉球囊阻断应用于凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产术的围手术期护理[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 339-342.
阅读次数
全文


摘要